Suffer, suffer, you deserve it. Sin of your ancestors who were germanized must be purified in agony of mental suffering.
In the meanwhile, be advised, Sarmatian is foreign given form of root SRB/SERB (Serbian), while Thracian represent foreign given form of root RAS/RUS. In both cases we speak of one and same people. You just have that Sarmatian/Thracian (ie old Slavic) dualism for one and same people/lands since time immemorial. But, in any case, some cultural reason existed that ancients divided themselves on Sarmatians/Thracians. Some suggests that Sarmatians were more sedentary, more cultivated, while Thracians were more wild, more nomad.
Aha, so you're really a jelly donut, eh Bratwurst Boy?? LOL
Guess that makes me just another Berliner Pfannkuchen (..only minus the powdered sugar on top)!
Apropos the current topic post, I take it, as with last time, you remain a flaming anti-Merkelite, whom many conservative members of the parliament feel is bent on destroying Germany, am I right?
Might interest you to know that I've long since revisited the entire question of multiculturalism and do not like what I see one little bit.
We just might have some common ground after all. Glad you're back.
I've long since revisited the entire question of multiculturalism and do not like what I see
It is actually very simple as jon has repeatedly pointed out Lyzko. "White people are the problem in this world." Once you Progressive Marxists solve that problem your "Cultural Enrichment" agendas will be a piece of cake.
Yugoslavia was healthy multicultural, I can tell you that one. Respected country on all meridians, among all races. There were state programs on helping to poor countries of Africa. There were African, Asian, European, Latin American students here. But state was founded on Slavic heritage and nobody encouraged racial mixing. Ultimate idea was coexistence of races and solidarity within diverse humankind, not merging of all races into one. Gays had rights but non glorified their way of life and actually gays lived more peacefully then it is now.
Then, EU leading powers and US Clinton clan destroyed Yugoslavia. Now we have new order of disorder.
But state was founded on Slavic heritage and nobody encouraged racial mixing
Maybe it would had been better they would had been build a yugoslavian identity and definitely encouraged racial mixing! ;)
And if it was so healthy, why was the breakup so bloody, bitter and brutal? There was not much holding these people together but the iron fist of the founders.
You just have to look who financed come back of ustashe Nazi regime in Croatia prior to dissolution of country. Western Europe did it following German policy. In Bosnia, you look who financed establishing of Alija Izetbegovic as Muslim leader who was bringer of sharia law. That was Islamic league, western Europe and US Clinton`s. Who transported worse Arab mujaheedines into Bosnia by UN planes. NATO did it.
When rogue players were set from outside, Civil War occurred.
Compare the breakup of Czechoslovakia!
Exactly. In case of Yugoslavia bloody war was desired from outside. Not that you don`t have morons within but, you can found morons in every single country in the world. You just need strong enough outside force that need war.
Calm down, they're upset about two migrants with no legal right to be in Germany killing a German citizen (half-Cuban by the way) by stabbing him 25 times!
They expressed that by peacefully demonstrating with the pictures of other Germans killed by the unstable young men that Merkel helped bring into the country.
And handful of neo-nazis joined in (as did some crazy antifa lunatics) and everyone (including you!) is trying to use that as an excuse to ignore migrant crime.
Let the good people of Chemnitz mourn the dead and protest publicly and discuss their concerns... before resentment against a government that cares so little about citizen safety really does explode...