It isn't for anything, other than allowing corrupt politicians to hide behind their parliamentary position.
You're very simply not telling the truth again, are you. Or would you like to give us details about those 60 prosecutions?
Why would a party that is supposedly anti-corruption hide behind immunity? It makes no sense whatsoever.
you lie Harry.
September 3 of that year Zbigniew Ziobro waived immunity [10 ] . 4 November 2009 investigation against him , however, was discontinued due to lack of evidence justifying a criminal offense
pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zbigniew_Ziobro
about those 60 prosecutions...am merely quoting what mularczyk said:
wpolityce.pl/polityka/266541-posel-po-oskarza-kolegow-o-lenistwo-ws-postawienia-ziobry-przed-ts-jest-kilku-poslow-ktorzy-zegnaja-sie-z-polityka-i-nie-chodza-na-glosowania
"This case is part of the campaign against Zbigniew Ziobro . There were 60 criminal cases, two committees of inquiry and nothing. Any judgment. Therefore, when you decided to overrule that Ziobro is guilty"