t is never a good idea to try and justify killing.
There is no doubt that for jon357 it is clear who is guilty 100% . And no trial is needed, no proof. He has full knowledge or at least he claims that he has. Right?
Then my statement
It is never a good idea to try and accuse anyone before the trial .
Full meaning : It is never a good idea to try and accuse anyone of committing a crime without proof before the trial
jon357 simply does not need any proof
And then you, Harry, in a hurry to put your opinion in :
Er, you are aware that one of the people at a trial is referred to as the 'accused', aren't you?
And now that chronology of the discussion has been restored, tell me Harry how my statement
It is never a good idea to try and accuse of committing a crime without proof anyone before the trialrelates to yours
Er, you are aware that one of the people at a trial is referred to as the 'accused', aren't you?
Explain it to me how they relate to each other ?