Poland blocks any action on climate change

A tiny minority. The overwhelming majority of scientists accept the fact of man-made climate change.


Lose what?

The argument.

Rich has already explained to you why so many scientists support the theory of global warming.
But you chose to ignore that,carry on in your deluded life.....we can't help you any more.

Scientists aren't arguing. That Rich person hasn't 'explained' anything at all...

Who said they where besides you to do another re-direct.


Oh, and you have besides your opinion.
Give up jon, you have lost this debate badly and you know it.

Arguing what?!!!! That climate is changing???? One more, and I swear, for the last time: Yes, it is changing. Even Caligula knew THAT!!!!
The question now is what do you and the scientists want to do about it?
Cough it out, finally. If you decide to answer, do it without using the word "Trump", "orange", or "money from the US". OK?

From pjmedia.com/trending/record-cold-forces-rethink-on-global-warming/

"Between 1940 and 1980, global temperatures went down. The consensus by 1970 was that global cooling was underway and would continue."

And this:

"Cold weather kills 20 times as many people as hot weather, according to an international study analyzing over 74 million deaths in 384 locations across 13 countries."

The problem with the liberals is that, just like most women, they are not capable of shame when caught lying.

You meant 3% ...

"Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree*: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position"

climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/


Not reopening coal mines would be a good start.


Deplorables pretending to be intellectuals -- an evolutionary cul-de-sac.

Sorry, not biting. You are late and we got all tired with your buddy. Bye.

Who's my buddy?

Hey, guys, for my next book about stupid people I need an explanation why this cold blast is actually a proof of global warming. The most ridiculous explanation will be rewarded with a free copy of my current one.

My version is this: the global warming freaks stole the hot air and shipped it to Planet Denial to convince the inhabitants that global warming is real. The additional benefit: here on Earth, those terrible temps will make the deniers will come out from the closets to make arresting them later easier.

Speaking of "Climate Change".............
Chicago just had all time record lows down to minus - 60 degrees with a 100 degree warm up coming by Monday.
Australia where it is now summer time......just had four days of record breaking high's.
They 'averaged' 104 degrees for four straight days.
Just shows you that Mother Nature has a sense of humor dunnit.

Actually it is all the E.U. fault for Climate Change.
European colonizers who arrived in the Americas caused death and disease to the point that it sparked what some have called the first major human induced change in the Earth's climate.

The University College London (UCL) found that the arrival of European settlers killed nearly 56 million indigenous people over the course of roughly 100 years.
The land these people were farming (the size of France) which turned back into forest and caused a massive decrease in carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere.

So there you have it, it is all the Europeans fault.
msn.com/en-us/weather/topstories/european-colonizers-mass-killing-of-native-americans-caused-change-in-climate-study/ar-BBT3Up2?li=BBnb7Kz

Well it proves that if you get rid of people the problem goes away, there are too many on the planet , just think if there was a species above us they would have had a cull by now.

Or issue permits to have babies. As with carbon, they could be sold and bought. That way, the more affluent would have more kids and the homeless bums none, as it should be.

It would take 837 new trees for an average American to be carbon neutral. but only 8 trees to cover the air you breath.

I don't mind if that was meant as an insult. I am just not smart enough to figure it out.

That's the problem Rich, people that can afford kids ($225,000 to raise one properly) don't want the burden.
The irresponsible and unaccountable indigent people that don't have two nickels to rub together pop kids out one after another to support themselves by receiving more government welfare that encourages and enables them to have six kids born into families of several generations of such mentality of mature cucumbers.


The New World Order will soon start involuntary mass sterilizations.

Glad I have my shelter (came with the farm) , and natural causes will get me before the radiation does.

That must be an old data as now thats even less then the cost of 4 yrs of college and living etc.

Must of been all the CO2 my truck spewed....

Yesterday I had to winch my friend out because the dumbass thought he could drive through an alley in a rwd... silly silly...

I remember when my younger daughter told me that she would never have kids because "the American kids have huge carbon footprint". That was 20 years ago. Today, as I am typing this, both of her carbon footprints are happily watching Mowglie in Grandpa's living room. Some insanities, like "we all are going to die" are cured naturally with the passage of time.

The gw idiots should figure out by now that short-term predictions, meant to scare the s*** out of the useful idiots, are very tricky because they are short-term for the reasons so obvious that I don't have to explain. That creates a real dilemma for the Gore-class liars, as predicting the end of life too far away does not have the requisite impact.

What to do...So, they switched to, drum roll, climate change.

So why don't you, get yourself a beer and watch it with them - concentrate on the bear necessities instead of trolling. If I left my kids with their Dziadzia for an afternoon I would want him to spend one of his last weekends on earth socializing with them rather than crouched over a keyboard ranting about liberals.

...and, after they leave, learn better English to know that bear and bare means the same thing. Thanks for the lesson.

? Over your head maybe :) strange because anyone who lived in the US for a long time would know that song

Forget about your worries and your strife

The climate change hoax will continue to reap billions and billions for those who have a financial interest in their scare mongering. This includes global bureaucrats (U.N.) and corporations who profit from it.l

They deserve every dime for their farsightedness and pure genius.
Fifty years ago, they predicted global cooling. To hedge their bets, later, they predicted global warming. How about that!
Like with that "heads I win, tails you lose".
At least, their Ph.D's in taxpayer ripology didn't go to waste.

It's ridiculous how they've changed the terms since there was too much disagreement between global warming and global cooling. Now they just have some bogus term to encompass all that.

Then again, leftists are masters at coming up with retarded terminology. Some other examples include toxic masculinity, white privilege, man-splaining and man-spreading, etc. and then of course the various -ists, -isms, and -phobes. I wouldn't be surprised if they coin something like envirophobic, carbon emissionists, pollutionism, etc.

All I know, IF global warming is proven to be a fact rather than just a theory (which it of course cannot since it doesn't not satisfy the scientific method as it is impossible to design an experiment, isolate variables, test against a control , and repeat the experiment achieving the same result each time and 1st year bio, chem, etc. major will admit that) i'll be quite happy because that means warming winters plus enormous opportunities in the arctic for shipping, mining, drilling, etc. Russia is already taking advantage of the warmer climate and colonizing the arctic.

Global cooling though not so much...

Anyway, good thing Trump withdrew the US from the Paris Agreement. Poland should too, except we didn't even have a choice due to the EU making the decision for us as they have with so many other things. The tree huggers need to lay off our natural resources. Why is it always the Western nations that get punished? No one is telling Saudi Arabia to stop pumping oil, or Africa or Bangladesh to stop burning electronics to extract copper, gold, etc. It's always whitey that has to pay for everyone else.... If you look uyp which countries are the most polluted it's almost all third world countries in Africa, M.E. and Asia. There's a map showing the US, Europe including Poland as bright green to pale green - meaning the lowest levels of pollution. And the liberals are naive enough to think that we're all just going to get along, work together in unity, no one will take advantage of the situation, and we'll all sing kum ba ya as one big happy world family.

Dirk, our enemies don't read our posts - even the short ones. The only way to nail them to the wall is to wait until they post something stupid, which is often so you don't have to wait long. Then, you ask a killer question they just can't answer without confirming that there is nothing like logic and facts in their heads. Long lectures never work.

Example: how much would you be willing to send to the UN to lower temperature by .5C in 100 years? You will never get an answer to that. Which means that all that bs about global warming is virtue signalling or just plain bs.

To lower it, nothing. If they promise to raise temperatures gradually then I'd donate a few bucks.

Also, the term is no longer 'global warming.' It's climate change now since the buffoons couldn't come to a consensus on whether the climates are getting warmer or getting colder. It's the most ridiculous term because the climate would change with or without humans. If climate change is supposed to be a negative thing, is climate staying exactly the same a positive?

Ignorance is bliss. All you need to do is to look at average global temperatures. They have risen by 1.8 F since 1880. Seventeen of the 18 warmest years in the 136-year record all have occurred since 2001, with the exception of 1998. The year 2016 ranks as the warmest on record. What more do you need?

climate.nasa.gov

The biggest straw-man pile of crap ever was when some climate genius complained about climate change deniers. What that climate wh**re overlooked was that there is no such thing as climate change deniers. Not even one.