link?
I think you might find it is linked to some guy down the pub. No newspaper or authority could print such a ridiculous stat and expect its readers to be so dim to consider it anything more than foolis.
So what you are saying is that there might be Poles, that we don't know about, who might have committed crimes, which we don't know about WTF.
No , I am saying this much of what you said " there might be Poles, that we don't know about, who might have committed crimes [which are recorded]. "
Do you really think every Pole that commits crime is caught and yet from other communities they are not" I am saying, what even a half-wit should understand is that 6777 Poles being caught cannot be the entire number. It is however the largest immigrant crime group. That is if your have a crime committed against you by an immigrant they are more likely to be Polish than of any other nation.
Have a read of this, tell me if you think it is valid :
After digging to a depth of 500 feet, Russian scientists found copper wire dating back over 1000 years, and came
to the conclusion that their ancestors already had telephone networks one thousand years ago.
In the weeks later, German archeologists dug 1000 feet and headlines in the German papers read: "German
archeologists have found traces of 2000 year old optical fibres, and have concluded that their ancestors had
digital telephone 1000 years earlier than the Russians.
One week later, the Polish newspapers reported the following: "After digging as deep as 2000 feet, Polish
diggers found absolutely nothing. They concluded that 5000 years ago, their ancestors were already using
wireless technology .
It the same type of fallacy except your writer, the idiot has made up a stat regarding how many crimes are made by one person and decided that no Poles can be counted because all Poles who commit crime are caught in the UK. LOL.