Madam, it is crazy, but it is also written down in black and white in the Polish Code of Family Law, article 60 paragraph 1, quoting:
"§ 1. Małżonek rozwiedziony, który nie został uznany za wyłącznie winnego
rozkładu pożycia i który znajduje się w niedostatku, może żądać od drugiego
małżonka rozwiedzionego dostarczania środków utrzymania w zakresie
odpowiadającym usprawiedliwionym potrzebom uprawnionego oraz
możliwościom zarobkowym i majątkowym zobowiązanego."
Basically all that needs to happen for that girl to ask him for alimony for herself is a conjunction of the following:
a) Her not being found solely guilty of the marriage falling apart ( highly unlikely that the ruling will be different )
b) Her not having means to properly support herself ( "niedostatek", any Polish lawyer that's around is free to translate this term more precisely, I did it up to my best ability )
That's it, she can go for a ruling that will force him to pay alimony to her in such a case. And said alimony WILL be based, again in black and white in quoted article, not on what he earns but on what he can in theory earn ( "mozliwosci zarobkowe" - again, same issue as with niedostatek, anyone who can translate more precisely, by all means plz do so ).
There is also a paragraph 2 in that article that forms the basis of him having to pay up even more dough in case he is found solely guilty of the marriage falling apart.
Yup, Poland is a VERY female friendly country when it comes to family law.
I fully agree.
"§ 1. Małżonek rozwiedziony, który nie został uznany za wyłącznie winnego
rozkładu pożycia i który znajduje się w niedostatku, może żądać od drugiego
małżonka rozwiedzionego dostarczania środków utrzymania w zakresie
odpowiadającym usprawiedliwionym potrzebom uprawnionego oraz
możliwościom zarobkowym i majątkowym zobowiązanego."
Basically all that needs to happen for that girl to ask him for alimony for herself is a conjunction of the following:
a) Her not being found solely guilty of the marriage falling apart ( highly unlikely that the ruling will be different )
b) Her not having means to properly support herself ( "niedostatek", any Polish lawyer that's around is free to translate this term more precisely, I did it up to my best ability )
That's it, she can go for a ruling that will force him to pay alimony to her in such a case. And said alimony WILL be based, again in black and white in quoted article, not on what he earns but on what he can in theory earn ( "mozliwosci zarobkowe" - again, same issue as with niedostatek, anyone who can translate more precisely, by all means plz do so ).
There is also a paragraph 2 in that article that forms the basis of him having to pay up even more dough in case he is found solely guilty of the marriage falling apart.
Yup, Poland is a VERY female friendly country when it comes to family law.
Definitely the guy should take his laptop and cheap headphones and head for the mountains.....
I fully agree.