Also, Zdzisław, I would appreciate your counter-proof to the study.
Counter-proof? Did you understand the report yourself? Did you actually comprehend my responses to you? No you didn't.
Let's look at your absurd study and the three ethnic groups you highlighted: Poles on one end of the graph; Finns and Magyars on the other end.
Now, let's look at the current population sizes of these three groups:
Poland: 38,187,488 (Source: World Bank, 2010)
Finland: 5,363,624 (Source: World Bank, 2010)
Hungary: 10,008,703 (Source: World Bank, 2010)
Since 1960 to the present Finland's population increased 21%; Hungary's population increased 0.25% (yes, that's zero point two five percent) and Poland's population increased 29%.
All these figures are available on the internet and you can quickly get these results yourself. I don't need to find another report that was specifically written to refute yours.
One of the other links you provided discussed this dubious study about finger length ratios and determined the differences between Poland and the other two countries was likely due to Poland having more monogamous long term relationships in society where as Finland and Hungary were likely to have more infidelity and casual mating occurring. Despite these different mating strategies what you and your study can't deny is that
all three of these countries still have large white majorities that have respectively retained ethnic homogeneity.Regardless, my look at the population growth trends shows without a doubt that Poland's population retained not just a larger population - nearly 2.5 times larger than than both Finland and Hungary combined - but also had a significantly larger percentage increase in size over a 40 year period. And Poland managed this reproductive success despite your study and your opinion from it that falsely concludes that Polish men are somehow genetically unfit.
You and your study made absolutely no mention of life expectancy in these countries nor any consideration of the local environmental and socio-economic factors which also affect a person's health and chances of successful reproduction irrespective of genetic composition.
You and your study also failed to mention that Finns and Magyars happen to share a recent common ancestry which is still evident in the similarity of their languages and may also explain why they appear together on one side of the chart. Poles are ethnically and linguistically different than Finns and Magyars and do not share a recent common ancestry with either of them. These are facts. You can either discover them through your own observations or by doing your own research.
So, with all that I just provided you to prove your study is flawed, the questions that you need to answer is what was your real motive for creating this thread in the first place and why did
you concluded that "Polish women are advantaged by mating with foreigners"?
If you can't be honest with others then you should at least be honest with yourself and admit that you have a problem with Polish men. It is clear that it really bothers you and fellow haters like EM_Wave that Polish men, in their tens of millions, are able to find Polish females to have loving, lifelong relationships with and the results are they are consistently successful in passing on their genes to the next generation of ethnic Poles.