That's a BS. It has been proven that "Rightists" states in the US are far more generous and compassionate than the "leftists" one. Quit your silly attempts of denigrating conservatives.
what the heck do you know about the states? btw. that is not true at all.. the red states are the ones full of absurdity etc..
No, MG, the problem of rudness, vulgarity ,decadence, and violence is more of the Left; just look around you.
again, that is not true.. the righties are the ones full of rudeness... but rudeness has increased in all circles.
It's another BS. Read about a degradation of society in the UK with Tony Blair coming to power.
no, US went down the shlthole under bush2 more then anyone before him.
others shout down conservative speakers on campuses
this is a famous rightie tactic.. don't blame the lefties except for maybe being copycats.
And the Republican party is known for it's dirty way of dealing with things when not in power.
and when in power too.. we had to endure 8 years of that kind of lunacy..
I am rude to people who are rude to me, and compassionate to people who are compassionate towards me. Simple.
so, you're never the first? you're only a reactionary life?
The point I made is this; the general news outlets ignored a story (one of many) that shows liberals, leftists, rioting and damaging property and scuffling with the police.
your point isn't really on topic thus moot.
Read the link I added in the previous post. Our Tea Party friends know how to dish out some violence and damaging of properties as well. And if I assume right that those pro-lifers are part of the same target audience as the Tea Parties, they even kill ppl. And imo that is a bit worse than damaging some property or shouting through a conservative speech.
you are right.. the lifers are definitely the religious right..conservatives are the ones who started the shouting down the democratic speakers. this is not really a leftist tactic.. leftist tactic is to try to talk about the issues..
The media doesn't censor left violence as info on the disturbances (which probably are only minor incidents, but given the way the Republicans always exaggerate things, it's a "huge" ocurrance) is widely available on the internet.
correct once again
One more quick point; accusing Fox News of being a Republican outlet is laughable when comparing it to NBC; MSNBC, CBS and ABC which can more easily be accused of being Democratic Party fronts.
it's not laughable.. it is the case and everyone knows it.. the others may be leaning a bit left right now but definitely aren't mouthpieces of the left.
accusations against Fox News fall flat
no, they don't fall flat, tis the truth
On staff are liberals who daily contribute
yeah, who? lol
That's more fair coverage than the other news outlets give.
fair they are not and they are not even close to neutral as news ought to be.. just report it, don't spin it.
Fox News is owned by a member of the Bush family, I forget his name. And don't forget that the Democrats are only recently in power. And didn't Fox already called Bush winner before all Floridian votes were counted in 2000?
no, not a bush family member.. and yes, they called bush a winner way before half the votes were even counted.. shows their bias.
I've been to four tea party events and therefore I know better than you. I go as an observer and those gatherings are home-spun, vocal yet peaceful and only those who get their news from the vast liberal outlets don't seem to know this. These are good people.
yes, good people but all of them rather conservative and brainwashed in their view.
As to threats, you are probably unfamiliar with the ones that Republican candidates received, right? Here is just one example;
yes one republican as compared to dozens of democrats.. it's a laughable argument at best.
Odd, how that coincided with the beginning of economic troubles.
the economic troubles started with bush tax cuts for the rich under the repo controlled congress. funny how your memory is selectively short.
Nothing happens in a vacuum. Every choice produces consequences, every action causes a reaction. The rise of libertinism in the news, entertainment and advertising media and even in the school system provokes an understandable backlash which libertine-liberal leftists may see as a hate offensive. But they fail to see that their libertine offensive disgusts many people who don't want their kids exposed to all that pûrn and overall permissiveness. This functions not only within a single society. It is not libertine lifestyles that may well speed up the world-wide Muslim reaction to the fith and decadence? Marx once said the capitalists will sell the rope on which they will hanged. Maybe the decadent West is actually libertinising itself to death without realising it.
you post more and more senile nonsense.. may want to check in with your psychologist.. most capitalists are fervent rightwingers.
What if people switch parties and go to the other side. Do they alter their behavior accordingly?
of course..
That would be my mistake - I was talking too much from a Dutch perspective
yes, you are right and yes it is due to the right being in power.. at least that is so in the usa. and no, i don't think that it's a mistake to bring up right/left.
Weapons of mass distraction.
lol.. that's good. :D
But I was wondering, do we see a general trend here or is it limited to a few isolated incidents?
yes, it seems to be a trend across the board.
thinking people do not watch fix news and zimmy is a picture boy of the right wing stupid aka republican party
lol.. of course one has to watch faux newz just to keep tabs on the opposition.
we need third party in united States that will represent middle class and working people as i see it now republicans are robing middle class to give to rich and banks and democrats robing middle class to give to poor and banks ether way we are screwed.
yeah, i agree
moderately right wing Fox News.
lol.. that's a laugh.. faux newz is way, way to the right.. not moderate in the least.. lmao
That would surprise my Libertarian friends of whom I have many. Amazing how frequently you are mistaken, isn't it?
no, he must be spot on.. that's the way i see it.
another misguided idiots, they think the corporation is good but they corporations and banks are evil just look at the news and answer this.
the libertarians are even worse the middle of the road repubs.. they have 0 social conscience.. 0.. the gov is only there for corporations.
Big corporations run the show, and the masses are too busy squabbling over which party they were born in to, to notice that they are getting the scraps.
The only reason there are two parties, is to maintain the illusion of democracy.
true.. the left/right isn't really nonsense but they are harder and harder to distinguish between these days.
In general, people of right-leaning conservative persuasion tend to be more for politeness, civility and restraint as traditonal values than many leftists and anarchists who equate rudeness, vulgarity and aggressiveness with freedom.
i don't agree.. but i m thinking that you are thinking of the generations of old.. however that is not true in today's world.
That everybody is freaked out about crazy Muslim reactions just reinforces the point he was trying to make.
he really isn't/wasn't making a point.. he's just an idiot seeking attention.
It is a move away from Christian values and a move to this so called "enlightenment" that is the problem.
no it is not the problem.. hanging on to those outdated "ideas" of Christianity is the problem, imho.
Would the reactions be the same if someone decided to burn bibles?
of course.
No, the liberals would happily supply the bibles and the gasoline.
lol.. i know i would. ;)
Entire cities in the U.S. have been dominated and forced to comply to their politico-religious ideology
you are a ranting lunatic if you don't post up some proof.
Let me remind you that it was the IMAM in New York who threatened retaliation NOT the knee-jerk reaction of a few scared citizens.
what are you going on about? you obviously got your info from faux newz or glen beck.
This is actually nonsense.
yes it is.. p3 hasn't been making much sense as of late.. i am starting to wonder if he isn't Socrates or something..
being polite is a matter of character, not of political orientation.
yes and no.. there seems to be a tendency of the right (here in the USA) to be less polite then the left, imho
For a self-confessed Libertarian you lean quite far over to the right-hand side. There might be some truth in Marek1111's remark that you're a poster-boy for the Republicans, given the soothing way you talk about those Tea Party guys and the way you talk about the left-wingers. You may not be a poster-boy, but it's clear where your sympathies lay.
right on.. and he is.. but like i said, the libertarians can be even more to the right then repubs sometimes.
I always wonder where ppl like you get their information. Hearsay? Probably.
from another like minded bigot.. i have french friends too and none say anything of that sorts plus it is a pretty well known fact that in france, people assimilate more/better then most other eu countries.
And by the way, with this post you give evidence of possessing not much respect for those ppl at all. And of course in such circumstances, fairy tales become very quickly real stories.
so true..
--------------------
now to the topic at hand.. i think there is definite proof that the righties are less civilized, if you will.. just look at this thread.. the first bunch of posters are all right and they attack you right away without really staying on topic.. there is all the proof you need.
and not many people really touched the polish part of the topic which actually surprised me a bit.. so here it goes.. yes, rudeness is on the rise in PL.. the evidence of that are some of the posters from PL that post here. look at sok and torq.. both are/were extremely intolerable and rude.. then of course the 30th anniversary of solidarity and the way those celebrations went down.. not so pretty.. there was a vid posted in that thread, i think, that showed that pretty clearly.. the lady's name was crookednose (translated), i think.. and she had to chastise others who were so rudely trying to silence her and of course the verbal spanking kaczynski got from her was also proof of the way things are.. she wasn't too nasty at all but what was bothersome was that she actually HAD to do it based on his behaviour.
now, i also came across this article in polish which deals exactly with what you're after.. you may want to run it through a translator to get the gist of it:
The reason for the increase in the number of crimes among youth in Poland - according to police - including lack of authority. - For many young people are no longer the authority of parents or teachers . Looking for them among their peers who are able to quickly , often in a manner inconsistent with the right to earn money , or simply use violence against others . Also lowers the age at which young people turn to alcohol , drugs or undergo sexual initiation - said Sokolowski.