Polonius is right stressing the fact that - even though the political systems and slogans have changed - there still remains a need and desire to wrap the most trivial concepts in a pompous, absolutely in-comprehensive language. One of my friends is afflicted by this: I dread reading his emails, although I cherish his company and eye-to-eye conversation. Thank you Barney for starting this topic, which is dear to my heart, even though I am no longer sure - after reading few pearls here - that I am still on topic. :-)
On 2011-06-21, at 7.24 a.m. Ms. Beata Szydło, Vice President of PiS - the largest opposition party in Poland - was interviewed in TOK FM radio by Dominika Wielowiejska. Ms. Szydło had nothing to say for sixteen minutes. Absolutely nothing.
Would you qualify the following outbursts of Ms. Beata Szydło as:
a. mowa-trawa (talk about grass growing)
b. polityczny bełkot (political gibberish)
c. wodolejstwo (waffle, water spouting)
d. drowning woman grasping a straw, and the straw was ... "THE program"
I loosely transcribed and translated only the first of seven or eight subjects raised by the interviewer. Her response to the remaining ones is equally uninformative.
DW: Mr. Kaczyński said that PO (Citizen Platform Party) defends the establishment of Round Table and their interests. Can you give a concrete example of such a defense?
BS: I think the best interpretation of the speech is to ask the author.
[Check, a politician's ABC, good way to deflect the direct questions.]
DW: J. Kaczyński did not want to come here, so I have to ask you about it. You sat beside him, at the recent conference, where your outlined your program ...
BS: In this program some directions are shown, which PiS considers most important to implement and to remove, so to speak, many decisions that have been taken in the last four years ... in many spheres of national life - social, economic, economical ....
One can talk about this subject a lot, but it is best to reach for our study. There are important things in it and it would be good to talk about them factually, because ... such sarcasm, such sarcastic statements: "what is this program that has nothing in there" ...
I think that during past two days, many critics and analysts, who have spoken out against it, have not read it. I think that focusing on these very important things ..
DW: This was an important statement of you leader; I would not ignore what Jaroslaw Kaczynski has said ...
BS: I do not want to comment on it, but - during his entire speech - Mr. Kaczyński paid close attention to certain elements included in our program...
And I think that everyone agrees that some changes have to be made in functioning and operating of certain aspects of public life that harm development of Poland. So I think that we can talk about this program and what has to be done in Poland over the next four years, and I think this is worthy to concentrate upon - to talk about concrete details...
For your entertainment, I am attaching another translation - this time from a Nonsense Encyclopedia
Translated from:
bezsensopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Bełkot
Nonsense-opia, Humorous Encyclopedia
Gibberish, babble - statement that does not hold water. This is defined as slurred speech or words difficult / impossible to understand. Gibberish is found in many places, but in different forms. It is both widely used by primitive persons, and educated ones; e.g., some philosophers.
Despite everything, however, there are areas where there is very little gibberish. An example of this can be mathematics, where everything has to stick to the inviolable rules of logic. Some see it as a disadvantage, however, because it reduces their field of action (if you have not learned it and you do not understand it, you will not solve it when taking a test).
Closely related to gibberish is waffle, "water spouting". While waffle hides deficiencies of knowledge by using excess of words the gibberish does it via lack of logic.
Types of gibberish
+ Classical
(...)
+ School-boy
(...)
+ Artistic
(...)
+ Humorous
+ Pseudoscientific gibberish - in that kind of gibberish large amounts of difficult words and complex concepts are used for interpretation of various phenomena. A typical use of scientific gibberish is to render a text in order to look smarter and more professional. It is often used by those who have only a vague idea about their field of expertise. The biggest archive of pseudoscientific gibberish is Wikipedia.
+ Philosophical gibberish - an earnest attempt to explain everything by illogical methods and proving that nothing is like it is. Philosophical gibberish has evolved in two directions: Existential and (non) Logical. The existential philosophical gibberish is an incessant search for meaning of life, usually ending with the conclusion that the meaning of life does not exist or it is just sex. Philosophical (non) logical gibberish is putting forward strange theses of the kind whether "a white horse is not a horse", and stranger yet - it attempts proving them.
+ Political gibberish - statements of some politicians, which are characterized by exalting their opinions over the laws of logic. Thanks to the political gibberish we find that [insert here a name of any politician] is responsible for all evil in the world, he is a fascist and he needs to be burnt at stake. Political gibberish does not have to stick to logic. Certain people present any nonsense in their favor. Political gibberish is often related to a secondary gibberish, which occurs when a person says some trash first, an then tries to forcefully prove it - not always following the laws of logic.