PolishForums LIVE  /  Archives [3]    
   
Archives - 2010-2019 / Life  % width 176

Poland's expats' colonial mentality?


ifor bach  11 | 152  
2 Jun 2013 /  #151
Ditto I think that is the case in a delph case.

That's quite a remarkable feat for the man to get the two of us to agree on anything.

I seem to have developed a delph obsession.

He appears to live in some sort of bizarre alternative-reality Poland. I'm fascinated to know what kind of psychedelic drugs would be required to achieve the desired effect. Whatever he's on it would have to be really powerful stuff with some pretty groovy side-effects.
poland_  
2 Jun 2013 /  #152
It would be interesting to compare receipts for a weekly shop for a family of four. Trouble is you would never get a like for like comparison.

We are a family of four the cost of our weekly shop in the UK at Asda is less than the weekly shop at Carrefour (Warsaw) Like for Like !!
delphiandomine  86 | 17823  
2 Jun 2013 /  #153
He appears to live in some sort of bizarre alternative-reality Poland.

I see you're still avoiding the question as to whether you actually pay Polish people a living wage with a proper contract.

Oh, and a source for your claim that 90% of people are living in communal properties would also be nice.
Ant63  13 | 410  
2 Jun 2013 /  #154
We are a family of four the cost of our weekly shop in the UK at Asda is less than the weekly shop at Carrefour (Warsaw) Like for Like !!

As I thought.
ifor bach  11 | 152  
2 Jun 2013 /  #155
I see you're still avoiding the question as to whether you actually pay Polish people a living wage with a proper contract.

Because (a) it's none of your business and (b) has nothing to do with what we are discussing.

We don't actually 'employ' anyone anyway because this makes no practical sense.
delphiandomine  86 | 17823  
2 Jun 2013 /  #156
I agree with you on this. I've often heard the word "free" used in conversations which I have assumed is a reference to the impediment of family culture.

You probably won't find much support with that theory among Poles, but I think there is definitely an element of it. For example : look at the trains whenever there's a long weekend - they're packed full of students going home. There are so many other things, but it is my opinion that the family culture hurts the employability of many people. It's even as simple as students going home every weekend rather than staying to gain experience in their field - or treating holidays as holidays, not as time to get that experience.

Like you say, the word "free" being used is almost certainly a reference to being able to do what they want rather than being obliged to return home.

It would be interesting to compare receipts for a weekly shop for a family of four. Trouble is you would never get a like for like comparison.

I think - in all fairness - Poland would win in the raw ingredients stakes, but would lose badly in other respects. For example - a dish involving chicken, rice and vegetables would be cheaper here. But if you wanted to make an Indian using pre-prepared things, then it would probably cost more - anything 'speciality' tends to come at a premium. On the good side, it encourages you to learn how to cook - but it's still frustrating that some ordinary things in the UK cost so much in Poland. And some things are just marketed differently - in the UK, for instance, lentils are ridiculously cheap. But in Poland, they're seen as an "eko" product with the price tag to match. Same with chickpeas. On the flip side, I don't think anyone in the UK thinks in terms of kilograms for meat.

And there are no ridiculously cheap jars of curry sauce here :(

Then there is the lack of safety net if life goes pear shaped which it can do in a moment.

Now - this is something. Poland is absolutely unforgiving if life does go pear shaped - I think it does encourage personal responsibility, although I guess the standard procedure is for the family to help if something goes wrong. What always seemed strange to me was that the Polish culture seems to think that it is cruel to put an elderly relative in care, even if the person needs it - instead, family members are supposed to give up their lives to care for the person instead. I don't get it, and I think it's a form of imprisonment for the family.

It depends on your reference point really. If you are using a Bangladesh slum as a reference point then extreme poverty doesn't exist in Poland unless alcohol is involved. I've yet to come across an apartment building in the UK (I'm sure there are examples) where a single toilet is shared between a whole floor and not one apartment has a bath. I have visited two such places in Poznan. Interestingly these people living there do not use the "I'm poor feel sorry for me" ruse, but better off acquaintances do.

Were these in the city centre by any chance? What usually seems to happen is that these places are recovered by the original owners, but they don't have the money to renovate nor the means to get those people out. And of course, who is going to renovate a building if the tenants don't have the means of paying anyway?

We don't actually 'employ' anyone anyway because this makes no practical sense.

So for all your posturing, you actually admit to employing people on junk contracts with no job security? :)

For what it's worth, good schools can and do offer umowa o prace.
Wroclaw Boy  
2 Jun 2013 /  #157
We are a family of four the cost of our weekly shop in the UK at Asda is less than the weekly shop at Carrefour (Warsaw) Like for Like !!

I concur Mr Warszawski.
ifor bach  11 | 152  
2 Jun 2013 /  #158
Just about the only people working on such contracts (if you are talking about language schools) are naive natives in their first jobs who are happy to work for peanuts.

People such as yourself, perhaps?
delphiandomine  86 | 17823  
2 Jun 2013 /  #159
Honestly, I'm more surprised that you've got the nerve to come on here and tell everyone how poor Poland is and how big your flat is, all the while employing people on junk contracts with no job security. A quick look at your website shows some young people as well - so it's even worse.

People such as yourself, perhaps?

Try again, I don't work for a language school. But I do have a proper contract and don't have to worry about how I'm going to feed myself in the summer because my foreign boss keeps me on a junk contract that benefits him and not me.
ifor bach  11 | 152  
2 Jun 2013 /  #160
Honestly, I'm more surprised that you've got the nerve to come on here and tell everyone how poor Poland is and how big your flat is

As I don't actually employ anyone at all I don't know what you are talking about.

I'd love to know what you're taking to achieve that alternative state of consciousness that leads you to make quite bizarre, random accusations about people you know literally nothing about and have never met.
Grzegorz_  51 | 6138  
2 Jun 2013 /  #161
I saw an expat today. He was cleaning cars' windows in front of Biedronka.
delphiandomine  86 | 17823  
2 Jun 2013 /  #162
As I don't actually employ anyone at all I don't know what you are talking about.

So your wife runs the company, not you. No real difference.

I'd love to know what you're taking to achieve that alternative state of consciousness that leads you to make quite bizarre, random accusations about people you know literally nothing about and have never met.

I'd love to know why you and your wife run a business that screws over young Poles by hiring them on junk contracts.

And for that matter, I'd also like to know why you made racist posts towards members of this forum.

I saw an expat today. He was cleaning cars' windows in front of Biedronka.

Nothing wrong with that.
ifor bach  11 | 152  
2 Jun 2013 /  #163
So your wife runs the company, not you. No real difference.

She doesn't employ anyone either other than a (part-time) accountant and secretary.

Please explain what any of this has to do with yourself.
delphiandomine  86 | 17823  
2 Jun 2013 /  #164
She doesn't employ anyone either other than a (part-time) accountant and secretary.

As I keep saying, junk contracts. It doesn't matter how you phrase it - the fact remains that there are people doing work for you who are employed on junk contracts that you can terminate at any time. They might not be "employed" in the strict sense of the word, but that only makes it worse.

As for what it has to do with me - it's very curious that a foreigner, who has so much to say about the lives of Poles, would choose to contribute to the problem rather than fixing it.
Wroclaw Boy  
2 Jun 2013 /  #165
This wasn't any kind of personal attack on you (meaning Paulina) as my friend Tosser Boy presumably took it for.

I didnt actually ifor, i was just amused at your use of the language - very pretentious.
ifor bach  11 | 152  
2 Jun 2013 /  #166
As I keep saying, junk contracts. It doesn't matter how you phrase it - the fact remains that there are people doing work for you who are employed on junk contracts that you can terminate at any time. They might not be "employed" in the strict sense of the word, but that only makes it worse.

To the best of my knowledge, she doesn't have any 'contracts' with anyone. Perhaps she secretly does and you know about it but I don't. From where have you mysteriously acquired such in depth knowledge of the spouse of an anonymous internet poster. I am genuinely intrigued.

As for what it has to do with me - it's very curious that a foreigner, who has so much to say about the lives of Poles, would choose to contribute to the problem rather than fixing it.

By doing what exactly? Wasting his time arguing with loonies on internet sites?
Harry  
3 Jun 2013 /  #167
As I keep saying, junk contracts. It doesn't matter how you phrase it - the fact remains that there are people doing work for you who are employed on junk contracts that you can terminate at any time. They might not be "employed" in the strict sense of the word, but that only makes it worse.

To be fair to ifor, I've met one of the people who worked at his school (briefly by all accounts): that chap was a walking demonstration of why schools here tend to use the umowa o dzielo. I understand that somebody else here had a similar experience to ifor's with the chap in question.
delphiandomine  86 | 17823  
3 Jun 2013 /  #168
The word on the grapevine is that there is the beginnings of a major crackdown on using these - haven't had it verified though. It seems that they've finally started to wise up to this scam - and with it, the entire "industry" will probably go down the toilet.

In one respect though, there's no reason not to use umowa o prace - there's a 12 week probation period, so any clearly incompetent teacher can be found out quite quickly.
ifor bach  11 | 152  
3 Jun 2013 /  #169
I didnt actually ifor, i was just amused at your use of the language - very pretentious.

The use of the language was ironic. Sorry if this goes over your head, TB.
Harry  
3 Jun 2013 /  #170
The word on the grapevine is that there is the beginnings of a major crackdown on using these - haven't had it verified though. It seems that they've finally started to wise up to this scam - and with it, the entire "industry" will probably go down the toilet.

More probably schools will simply tell all potential teachers that if the teacher doesn't have their own company, the school isn't interested. Personally I'd hate to work for a language school that gives umowa o praca: the amount of risk that the owner is taking is far higher than with freelancers and the owner will therefore want a much bigger cut of the profits to cover that extra risk.
delphiandomine  86 | 17823  
3 Jun 2013 /  #171
More probably schools will simply tell all potential teachers that if the teacher doesn't have their own company, the school isn't interested.

This is what the British Council have done, and it wouldn't surprise me if others follow. But would it really work in schools paying far less than the BC?

Personally I'd hate to work for a language school that gives umowa o praca: the amount of risk that the owner is taking is far higher than with freelancers and the owner will therefore want a much bigger cut of the profits to cover that extra risk.

This is the other thing : there really needs to be some sort of reform of employment law to allow employers to have less risk yet providing some job security for employees. The amount of danger in giving someone umowa o prace is just ridiculous.
jon357  73 | 23078  
3 Jun 2013 /  #172
f the teacher doesn't have their own company

I do wish that Polish organisations, especially language schools who of all people should know a lot better, would stop translating działaność gospodarcze as 'company'.
delphiandomine  86 | 17823  
3 Jun 2013 /  #173
I'm stuck in the habit too :(

But even the Governmental organisations seem to use "firma" for those.
jon357  73 | 23078  
3 Jun 2013 /  #174
Indeed. Firm would be better, though obviously far from ideal. Next time I hear someone describing a person registered as self-employed as having a company, I'll ask who the shareholders are.
Wroclaw Boy  
3 Jun 2013 /  #175
The use of the language was ironic. Sorry if this goes over your head, TB.

Wrong again, but no worries Warren.
OP Polonius3  980 | 12275  
3 Jun 2013 /  #176
Business activity is the best translation. Economic activity sounds weird in English.

However not every company is a stock company with shareholders. There are a slew of companies under Polish law: akcyjna, cywilna, jawna, z o.o., komandytowa, partnerska...maybe a few others as well.

Archives - 2010-2019 / Life / Poland's expats' colonial mentality?Archived