There's no need to be so aggressive. I'm well aware of what the news says; I work there.
If Trwam put on their application "Charity status" or filed for plurality, then they'd get their place. They didn't, they applied as a business with the rights to run advertising and generate revenue, but they did not specify their terms and conditions. They don't want to run as a charity because then they can't reap the business benefits, but they don't want to run as a business because then they wouldn't be able to accept donations from poor old women.
It's Trwam trying to have its cake and eat it. And I didn't realise my tolerance was famous, one-sided or otherwise.
If Trwam put on their application "Charity status" or filed for plurality, then they'd get their place. They didn't, they applied as a business with the rights to run advertising and generate revenue, but they did not specify their terms and conditions. They don't want to run as a charity because then they can't reap the business benefits, but they don't want to run as a business because then they wouldn't be able to accept donations from poor old women.
It's Trwam trying to have its cake and eat it. And I didn't realise my tolerance was famous, one-sided or otherwise.