Rather than just insult, why don't you provide a counter argument to point out why what I stated is incorrect?
It was a deep disappointment talking H.
For a long time I believed that you're a nasty person but learned. I have thought you twist and manipulate and lie about issues due to your ideological optic. Never I have thought you are just a BS-sh..er who dress his prejudices and views in a respectable veil of knowledge.
Boy I couldn't be more wrong.
Long versus rounded head ( or in this case faces) is not really indication of a Mongol gene. Not by a long shot. Especially if your conclusion it is based on a casual organoleptic impression .
Besides is not as if 'a round face' could be found only in Poland but not in Germany or any given country. Also a race divides into subgroups but it doesn't mean one can put down those subtle differences within the same race to something as obscure and unscientific as a 'Mongolian rape gene' - that is just laughable.
There were three major incursion into 13th century Poland by let term it - 'Mongolian' hordes.
They had primely plunder and murder in mind.
1. If they captured some young women (or men) if they didn't killed them. Generally they took them as slaves with them. So those captives didn't contribute any genes to the population they remined
2.If a raped woman escaped:
a. has a child survived till adulthood? (need I remind you about harsh conditions and rates of the children mortality of the 13th century).
b. could as a bastard find suitable love interest to procreate - not that easy.
c. could be left in a church or a monastery as an infant and if those institutions raised it, more oft or not such a child would became a nun, a monk with not real chance to spread his or her genes around.
d. not all warriors in a Mongolian horde were Mongolians, Tatars or what have you. Often part of the army included contingents of warriors from territories subjugated by Tatars i.e. Moscow.
To sum it up.
Given all the circumstances impact of 'a Mongolian rape gene' on a general population's gene pool had been negligible.
Sure they are some Mongolian genes but those were result of a peaceful settlement of some Tatars warriors on the territory of the Grand Duchy of Lithuanian.
It doesn't account for so many 'round faces' you see around. Also DNA as far as I know do not support your laughable claims.
As to your point about Asia. Sure Indo-European or Aryans came to Europe from Asia. So you're correct on this.