What do you mean by that?
Harry means that the guy is a mafia fellow and Harry knows him very well, so I `d better be careful.
Why is this Businessman posting anonymously?
Guess why! :):):)
Comment from that site:
I've just read the article and it is shocking. It's hard to imagine that it was written by an American. Very sloppy.
Some key points that need addressing:
Isn't the aquarium housed in a listed building? Didn't you ignore the law and make 'alterations' to it? Wasn't that the reason for the delay in it's opening? Isn't it possible that your behavior soured the relationship before the doors opened? What were these legal 'technicalities'? And there is no shred of evidence that this attempted curruption took place!? What do you expect the courts to do!? Answer these questions and you might be taken seriously - and not just a whinging foreigner.Conflict - story
The problems with the Aquarium started at the very beginning, in 2008. The Polish American cooperation was marred with mutual distrust and clash of interests.
rp.pl/artykul/190124.html
In 2009 Polish partners annuled the contract.
First rumours and articles about closing the Aquarium appeared 2.5 years ago, in Jan 2010.
krakow.naszemiasto.pl/artykul/305368,krakow-wodnej-atrakcji-grozi-likwidacja,id,t.html
The case was taken to court in June 2010
polskatimes.pl/artykul/284061,krakow-sad-zdecyduje-o-losie-akwarium,id,t.html
Since then, the enterprise hasn`t paid the rent. The Institute demanded the payment through the court a few times. Currently, the Aquarium owes 500.000 PLN to the Institute.
lovekrakow.pl/aktualnosci/aquarium-zlikwidowane.-co-ze-zwierzetami_1537.html
and hence today`s ruling.
The main accusation which is easy to prove is the lack of rent payment.
Guys on reef site are very critical about Aquarium Krakow.
nano-reef.pl/index
Statement of the Institute
isez.pan.krakow.pl/Oswiadczenie_Aquarium.pdf