Katty
23 Mar 2015
Language / Consonant voicing and devoicing - Upodobnienia pod względem dźwięczności [3]
Cześć!
I was wondering if someone could explain this concept to me, as I don't fully understand what my textbook is telling me. I know that in combination with other letters, written głoski i.e. rz will be softened to sz when next to another unvoiced consonant, like k, or p.. but there's a section in the book that says:
"Utrata dźwięczności to ubezdźwięczienie, nabycie dźwięczności to udźwięcznienie Warto jeszcze zapamiętać, że wszystkie upodobnienia wewnątrzwyrazowe pod względem dźwięczności są martwe."
Dzięki!
(sorry if this is already a thread, but i couldn't see it anywhere thus far :))
Cześć!
I was wondering if someone could explain this concept to me, as I don't fully understand what my textbook is telling me. I know that in combination with other letters, written głoski i.e. rz will be softened to sz when next to another unvoiced consonant, like k, or p.. but there's a section in the book that says:
"Utrata dźwięczności to ubezdźwięczienie, nabycie dźwięczności to udźwięcznienie Warto jeszcze zapamiętać, że wszystkie upodobnienia wewnątrzwyrazowe pod względem dźwięczności są martwe."
Dzięki!
(sorry if this is already a thread, but i couldn't see it anywhere thus far :))