Monastyrev
26 Feb 2010
Genealogy / Are Poles aware of Thracian aspect in original roots of Polish ethos? [69]
That is a very narrow-minded point of view, as genetics answers are the final, absolute truth. No, you cannot conclude just from genetics, you must interpret your findings and not just use one field, you must include other fields to support your theory.
Turks are not semitic.
Crow, your theory is too short, it jumps all over the place, yes Etruscan and Italian names that include Rosa, Rosi, etc. etc. are interesting, but you're jumping to conclusions.
How is Serb or Srb, is related to Sarmatia? It could be, but your explanation is too short. Serbi can also be Servio: to be a slave to, serve, attributed to the sound change in Latin from v/w to b. It could be wrong, because this is only linguistics, and doesn't include different points of views, from different fields.
I think that genetics and development on this field will bring many answers.
That is a very narrow-minded point of view, as genetics answers are the final, absolute truth. No, you cannot conclude just from genetics, you must interpret your findings and not just use one field, you must include other fields to support your theory.
Actualy, Bulgarians were formed as ethos after foreign Semitic (Turkic) factor was imposed on native European Thracians
Turks are not semitic.
Crow, your theory is too short, it jumps all over the place, yes Etruscan and Italian names that include Rosa, Rosi, etc. etc. are interesting, but you're jumping to conclusions.
How is Serb or Srb, is related to Sarmatia? It could be, but your explanation is too short. Serbi can also be Servio: to be a slave to, serve, attributed to the sound change in Latin from v/w to b. It could be wrong, because this is only linguistics, and doesn't include different points of views, from different fields.