WhizzKid
4 Jun 2010
Language / A little Polish grammar. Masculine, animate objects. [64]
The thing with Polish accusative is that we have a kind of a case shift ongoing in the language. "Pies" is by all means animate, but retains "irregular" (for its animacy) features.
A similar thing is English - twelve most often used verbs are irregular:
be, have, do, say, make, go, take, come, see, get, know, give, find
Same goes for broadly used Polish nouns - they tend to evade rules ;-) But don't worry, there is only a couple of words with irregular inflection (well, certainly less than 500) and other nouns should easily succumb to the inflection :-)
As for grammatical descriptions, these are the proper names of genders and their subtypes:
1. Masculine
a) masculine personal (= animate)
b) masculine impersonal (= animate) (this one actually varies from source to source)
c) masculine inanimate
2. Feminine
3. Neuter
4. Masculine-personal
5. Feminine-objective (aka clunky Nonmasculine-personal)
Other than that, z_darius has explained this properly :-)
The thing with Polish accusative is that we have a kind of a case shift ongoing in the language. "Pies" is by all means animate, but retains "irregular" (for its animacy) features.
A similar thing is English - twelve most often used verbs are irregular:
be, have, do, say, make, go, take, come, see, get, know, give, find
Same goes for broadly used Polish nouns - they tend to evade rules ;-) But don't worry, there is only a couple of words with irregular inflection (well, certainly less than 500) and other nouns should easily succumb to the inflection :-)
As for grammatical descriptions, these are the proper names of genders and their subtypes:
1. Masculine
a) masculine personal (= animate)
b) masculine impersonal (= animate) (this one actually varies from source to source)
c) masculine inanimate
2. Feminine
3. Neuter
4. Masculine-personal
5. Feminine-objective (aka clunky Nonmasculine-personal)
Other than that, z_darius has explained this properly :-)