ShortHairThug
30 Sep 2011
History / Did British public protest against the sell out of Poland to the Soviets? [286]
For once I would really like to see you taking your own advice which would be nice and refreshing Harry.
What makes your statement pathetic is the suspicious lack of Polish representatives at those negotiations for a self-governing state be it Teheran, Yalta or Potsdam. Ironically your self-appointment to represent Polish interests in those negotiations puts you in the position of sole custodians thus making you solely responsible for what had happened afterwards and that’s no lie.
Yet curelessly enough thanks the so called allies of ours (read his untimely death and the controversy surrounding the circumstances of) as well as no other Polish representative present there that determined the future borders of his state. Contrary to your claims it was your own self- interest at heart that was the guiding principle behind those closed door negotiations. Please don’t do us any favors’ in the future. When you stop meddling in the affairs of others you won’t have to come up with some pathetic excuse like “we negotiated in good faith, it was Stalin that did not keep his end of the bargain!”, “who would have thought?”, “what else could we have done?”, “we were exhausted!” etc.
Simple as can be, three powers diving up the spoils of war.
Hear, here!! Speak the truth, simply state you were looking forward to salvage what was left of the British Empire, your position in the world and prestige rather than pretending to negotiate in good faith on our behalf, no one will hold it against you. Simple enough Harry, isn’t it?
Why can't you learn that a lie constantly repeated does not become the truth: instead it simply is repeatedly exposed as a lie so that more and more people know that it is a lie.
For once I would really like to see you taking your own advice which would be nice and refreshing Harry.
Could you please be so kind as to quote the parts of the relevant agreements which show that, given that the British and Americans had secured a promise from Stalin that there would be a Polish state and that there would be free and fair elections in Poland open to all parties other than the fascists, Poland’s independence was threatened. Either that or stop telling your latest pathetic lie.
What makes your statement pathetic is the suspicious lack of Polish representatives at those negotiations for a self-governing state be it Teheran, Yalta or Potsdam. Ironically your self-appointment to represent Polish interests in those negotiations puts you in the position of sole custodians thus making you solely responsible for what had happened afterwards and that’s no lie.
Which allied leader first proposed moving Poland’s borders to their current western location? Oh yes, it was General Władysław Sikorski.
Yet curelessly enough thanks the so called allies of ours (read his untimely death and the controversy surrounding the circumstances of) as well as no other Polish representative present there that determined the future borders of his state. Contrary to your claims it was your own self- interest at heart that was the guiding principle behind those closed door negotiations. Please don’t do us any favors’ in the future. When you stop meddling in the affairs of others you won’t have to come up with some pathetic excuse like “we negotiated in good faith, it was Stalin that did not keep his end of the bargain!”, “who would have thought?”, “what else could we have done?”, “we were exhausted!” etc.
Actually it is far simpler, it is as simple as can be; after all
Simple as can be, three powers diving up the spoils of war.
what can be simpler than something which does not exist?
Hear, here!! Speak the truth, simply state you were looking forward to salvage what was left of the British Empire, your position in the world and prestige rather than pretending to negotiate in good faith on our behalf, no one will hold it against you. Simple enough Harry, isn’t it?