Love /
Mosque and Catholic Church Wedding in Poland. Is That Possible? [21]
In this case the husband wanted nothing from the RCC. He was happy to get married anywhere. The wife was the one who wanted a church wedding. The RCC wanted something from him, not the other way round.
It was his wife to be. It was between themselves to sort it all out. He could say no to her demand of marring in the church - he goes along with it so that his choice. where is duress?
How predictable that you would blame the RCC.
Why is it necessary to force people to make a promise which they do not want to make?
because if somebody wants to be married in the Church should accept all condition attached. They could choose civil ceremony.
Why do you pretend not to understand, that what I don't like in your
debates. always trying to score always with agenda. We know Harry what do you think about the RCC, you are looking for an angle to hit it again - that is not debate but boring excrement.
What an interesting way of saying that you cannot argue against the truth.
Well I say how it is I cannot be bother to yet again to prove that your logical fallacy is in fact a logical fallacy.
Do you wish to say that a wedding in a mosque and then a church is impossible but that a wedding in a synagogue and then a church is possible?
No, just wanted to say that it has nothing to the with OP qestion and with my post and is plainly off-topic. You have been using logical fallacy as your tool to hit at why you are prejudiced against that now you have lost your plot altogether. You are not able to construct a decent argument.
According to Matrimonii sacramentum from 18.03.1966 the non-Catholic party is released form making such promises. Only the Catholic party is required to make them (AAS 58(1966)
When they are marring in the church. I think it differ when they marry elsewhere but Catholic party wishes to have his/her marriage valid in the eyes of the church.
