Love /
Polish girls call themselves sensitive and easily to be hurt, but how if they hurt others [35]
Let me attempt to parse the post.
When a Polish woman claims to be sensitive, and prone to hurt feelings, the poster would agree with them for the following reason: She is a human being. Whether she is Polish or another nationality is irrelevant. In his eyes, the creator (ed. all versions of said creator could be interchangeable, whether one is of the Christian, Muslim, Jewish or FSM faith...) has instilled them with a cornucopia of emotions and feelings. He goes on to suggest, rightly or wrongly that men, like the fabled Gepetto, play women like marionettes as if playing game. He takes issue with the propensity for men to toy with women's emotions reminding the reader that humans of the female persuasion, are indeed human. Ergo, as a human, they should be exempt from such behavior. The poster then sets up a metaphoric analysis comparing a woman's heart to a deep ocean, filled with mysteries, serenity, and things of beauty, never to be fully understood by those of the male persuasion. I feel however that dependant on ones perspective, the poster's metaphor could be mis-read. For many, a Deep Ocean could be construed as a deep dark abyss from which many men have ventured, never to be seen again, either being crushed by the depth of the ocean to which they have found themselves inadequately prepared for or eaten by a fiendish sea-monster of Mythological Greek Proportions. I might suggest that either the poster is an idealist, or a subversive feminist imposter. In his closing remarks, the poster plants a seed of respect for women by suggesting that a woman has the ability to don so many roles in society (Mother, Sister, Friend) and that when compared to the brutality that men are capable of, it is obvious that a woman has evolved to care. This comparison is well developed, and draws well from the concept of Yin and Yang.
The analysis of complex relationships continues in the post above. The poster is aware of a woman who has the ability to be "bad", yet is able to care to the proper degree for a husband and their children. I am particularly impressed with the use of the subjective term "bad". When reading this line, one is never sure if this woman is bad in the sense of a woman with a Madonna / ***** complex, or if the woman is a mass murderer. By utilizing the subjective term, he is fostering a discussion amongst those of a wide array of view points, all who have some unique perspective to bring to the table. He goes on to implore the poster to which he replied to to expand on the idea of how a Bad woman can care for her mate and their children.
In an analysis of Polish society, the poster points out that certain individual females, in a stark juxtaposition to the females in his society, are socially and sexually adventurous. In his culture, females like those "adventurous" specimens he has encountered in Poland, are statistically rare. Having limited experience with these outlying data points, he finds himself questioning the proper methodology of handling these experiences. There are very few time tested protocols that have been handed down from male to male over the generations from his particular societal sub-set. There is a definite amazement at a previously un-witnessed ritual in which males and females of the Polish species can interact. I would only go so far to compare his amazement to the first time a scientist witnessed primates using tools to extricate bugs from the depths of a tree for sustenance. It was previously thought that only humans possessed the ability to make use of tools. Continuing, he relates his experience at a social function where alcohol may have reduced the inhibitions of "good" girls. At the aforementioned party, boys and girls not bound by a committed and legally recognized relationship, are interacting in ways that would be considered inappropriate in his culture. I sense that he found the situation to be incredible, but at the same time, as if there were some tribal chanting with bon-fires, or like a feeding frenzy amongst a group of sharks, the poster partook in the rituals in which he found himself immersed. After the fact, he has found himself questioning the differences in societal norms, particularly as the relate to pre-conceived concepts of the female. He is exploring the boundaries of good / bad and how it seems a fine line can be crossed. In an attempt to understand the mindset of the Polish female, he has conducted surveys (accurate to +/- 3%, 19 times out of 20, conducted by telephone between the dates of May 5 through May 12 on random telephone numbers in the Warsaw telephone directory) with a series of questions as to what reasons one would need to become intimate with an heretofore unknown party. The top statistical responses all related to alcohol consumption, forgetfulness, and narcolepsy.
In a scathing commentary on the state of the Polish moral collective, he goes on to cast doubt on the trustworthiness of the promiscuous Polish female. In addition, he submits that in the social circles in which he circulates, this behavior is not statistically insignificant, but he fails to realize that the parameters of social norms may be different under the different circumstances to which he is accustomed. That said, he still feels a sense of optimism that during his remaining time in Poland, he will find a female whose moral compass is aligned with his own.
Wasif has replied to the OP's concerns about the state of the moral collective by reminding the OP that it is within each society one will find a range of morals with a symmetrically shaped bell curve pattern with extremes at both ends of the spectrums (Moral + 3 Sigma, Amoral - 3 Sigma). Should the OP find himself in a relationship with a female who lies on the -3 Sigma end of the bell curve, he should endeavor to discuss the situation and using all avenues of persuasion available to him, to correct the situation. However it should be noted that if there is sufficient data to surmise before the start of the relationship to suggest the partner is within the Lower half of the moral guidelines, said females should be avoided in the first place. Sage advice indeed.
