History /
The smallest Poland ever? [115]
How do you suggest we should call them?
I think that calling the western lands "odzyskane" (recovered) and the eastern lands "utracone" (lost) is too pretentious, Torq. It basically suggest that the ultimate right to the lands are in Poland, which is not true. Kievan Rus had Przemysl before Poland, but we don't call it "lost lands". Why France doesn't call Warsaw Duchy "lost territories" or Austria doesn't mention Poland as something lost. Call it its name: Galicia, Silesia, Wolyn, Vilnius, Grodno etc. This is, IMHO, more appropriate, what you think? Otherwise, it raises too much unnecessary tension.
I see that you are expert on Ukraine, well, well ...... where he was born - check.
Enlighten me, Ironside, with your immense intelligence where Taras Shevchenko was born. But before you answer that question remind me where Adam Mickiewicz, an icon of Polish literature was born. I hope it will help to straighten your narrow thinking process a bit.
Братались з вольними ляхами
Great point, don't you agree? Read every word carefully.
Kyiv is more Russian. The language of the streets there is Russian, not Ukrainian.
In what way? Just because a significant part of its population speaks Russian? Majority of those are proud Ukrainians who due to Russification speak Russian. But to say that they are Russians is wrong. It is the same as to say that Austrians are Germans and vice versa just because they speak the same language. There is different mentality, culture, history.