News /
Which French candidate for president will be best for Poland? [512]
It's not a secret that the FN is backed by Russia.
It's interesting that your fake news stories alway fall short in explaining why Russia would be funding any so-called populist/nationalist presidential candidates.
You certainly don't mind though when a globalist Zionist non-state actor like Soros is splashing his cash around to fund opaquely run NGOs and anarchist groups in an attempt to shape socially malignant policies and sway politics and public opinion in his favor in democratic societies on both sides of the Atlantic.
posters are so keen to push pro-Russia views and opinions on PolishForums, while also abusing enemies of Russia such as Ukraine.
Yet, more neurotic conspiracy theories. Baiting as well. This is why I suggested those on indefinite probation should have limited daily postings with limited word counts.
But let's look at some facts.
Crimea was annexed by Russia in 2014.
The American president at the time was Barack Hussein Obama (a smirking liberal).
The French president at the time was François Hollande (an effete liberal).
The Polish prime minister at the time was Donald Tusk (a low-key liberal).
They didn't prevent or halt the Russian annexation of Crimea nor did they do anything to have it returned Ukraine. The conflict in Donbass also flared up on their watch and the situation is still unresolved.
They could have helped Ukraine join NATO too but again did nothing.
These navel-gazing cast of characters were no friends of Ukraine and never would be.
And what did they do for Poland while the Russian bear was growling once again on her doorstep? Not much as usual. Oh, sure, now there is a token American presence but the pace to send them was glacial.
Indeed, even Defense Minister Antoni Macierewicz noted this at the time:
"We waited for decades, sometimes feeling we had been left alone, sometimes almost losing hope, sometimes feeling that we were the only one who protected civilization from aggression that came from the east,"
Source: usatoday.com/story/news/world/2017/01/14/poland-us-troops-nato-arrival-atlantic-resolve/96585564
Yep, lame duck Obama finally sent them when he was leaving office and Hillary's doomed-from-the-start presidential campaign was being blamed on the Russians rather than her lack of popularity and lack of ideas.
Sending US troops to Poland was just too conveniently scripted to fit a narrative. They weren't sent there to protect Poland. They were only sent there to make it look like the Democratic Party can act tough. But only when their own political careers and influence were threatened and blamed on a convenient bogeyman for the news cycles and not when Poland's actual safety and security are at stake by a historic aggressor.
Poland is still alone.
America and France are not going to sacrifice their own blood and treasure to save Poland in a conflict with Russia.
America and France never sent troops to rebuff imperialist Russia from its land grab of Poland.
The Nazi's bloody invasion of Poland wasn't the last straw for the Americans or the French.
And it was the Americans and French who left Poland to rot behind the Iron Curtain for decades.