PolishForums LIVE  /  Archives [3]    
   
Posts by Bratwurst Boy  

Joined: 2 Apr 2007 / Male ♂
Last Post: 18 Jul 2025
Threads: Total: 8 / In This Archive: 2
Posts: Total: 12241 / In This Archive: 4472
From: Berlin, Germany
Speaks Polish?: No
Interests: his helmet

Displayed posts: 4474 / page 64 of 150
sort: Latest first   Oldest first   |
Bratwurst Boy   
5 Jan 2011
History / Why is there NOTHING (besides Gdansk and Szczecin) in former Prussia? [80]

Gdansk was a free city. It was somewhat supervised by the League of Nations.

Against the will of their people!
And if the citizens wanted to keep their german passports they were forced to leave the town by the polish authorities.

"free city" my arse! Taken out of the Homeland by some treaty...
Bratwurst Boy   
5 Jan 2011
News / Why is Poland developing so slowly or in the wrong direction? Who is responsible ? [317]

Do you find it all interesting that the countries which were not a part of the Eurozone or members of ERM2 weathered the "crisis" better than the ones that were?

You mean the US and the UK???

There are not many countries outside of the EU...and countries like the Swiss and Norway have possibilities most other countries just don't have so they are not quite usable as models.

The rest is actually tetering with Iceland running under the EU umbrella to not stay out alone in the cold.

You don't want to make the anglo-saxon economy crisis, the biggest one since the 30's, an Eu-made crisis, won't you!
Bratwurst Boy   
5 Jan 2011
History / Lwów, Wilno ... kresy - Poland have lost enormoust part of our heritage... [389]

No BB, in 1938 Germans had 1280 tanks and 630 armored cars, thats 1910 armored vehicles as opposed to 480 Czech vehicles only 350 of which were tanks and only 150 of those were modern.

Manno...I really had the wrong impression but I'm not an expert on the Czechs.
But I remember that there had been made alot of the modern Skoda plants etc...but that had been during my school times...;)
Bratwurst Boy   
5 Jan 2011
News / Why is Poland developing so slowly or in the wrong direction? Who is responsible ? [317]

So post bailout, how is Greece in a better position fiscally? There is a huge moral hazard when you bail out a country.

It isn't and won't be for a long time!
It is in for a long, hard time...Germany had a dreary 10 years during the nineties as long needed structural changes had been made....Germany was even called the "sick man of Europe" as other countries wallowed happily in their credit bubbles, throwing around their fake paper money.

Greece too belonged to those without a sensible economical policy...now they are forced to restructure and it isn't pretty.

What if Greece would had been within and under a real economical union? Probably they wouldn't have to go through that now...because they wouldn't had let them go off so far.
Bratwurst Boy   
5 Jan 2011
News / Why is Poland developing so slowly or in the wrong direction? Who is responsible ? [317]

Devaluation allows a country to pay off investors in national debt. That in turn makes the debt less attractive to borrowers which forces a country to stop reckless spending, you can't magic money afterall.

I know what devaluation is! ;)

But you won't make a country more successfull as all the structural problems don't vanish magically because of that.
Bratwurst Boy   
5 Jan 2011
News / Why is Poland developing so slowly or in the wrong direction? Who is responsible ? [317]

I would say the exact opposite

Why? Take Greece or Ireland.

Without much influence on the intern economical policies we are required to bail them out but if there had been a closer observation, a common economical policy, a close cooperation, a common development of industry, of taxes, of labor, a synchronisation of welfare laws etc. the catastrophes could have been avoided.

As it is Germany is asked to bail out without being able to make sure to change the same structural failures which led to the need for the bailout in the first place.

Of course we balk at that! It's like throwing good money out of the window.

With common economical policies these building of the banking-, credit- and housing bubbles would have been avoided!

And what with all that talk about devaluation. It doesn't help your economy in the long run. It's a sign of weakness, of resignation...you can't build a future on devaluation... how often do you plan to do that?

Does that help with your corruption, with your tax fraud, that your main export are olives??? Nooo, of course not!

Devaluation is for an extreme case only and it helps nothing against the real problems. No, it is not possible under the Euro but it is hardly an argument against it.
Bratwurst Boy   
5 Jan 2011
News / Why is Poland developing so slowly or in the wrong direction? Who is responsible ? [317]

The ones I mentioned for starters. Throw in all of Asia (barring Japan), South America, the Middle East...hell, just about every country except those in sub saharan Africa...and even most of those countries are doing better than they did 10 years ago.

And...say...how did they rebuild and helped to spread wealth and democracy in Europe?

I don't like how the scope of the EU has grown.

I accept that.

That's why it would be better if those who want even more union split with those who have already enough.
Or else we enter a century full of griping, whining, sniping, feet dragging and finger pointing.

We so don't need that!
Bratwurst Boy   
5 Jan 2011
News / Why is Poland developing so slowly or in the wrong direction? Who is responsible ? [317]

The idea that you're promoting is that someone else knows what's best for those areas, and that locals will remain incompetent to advance themselves.

Well..that's the way the countries work. There is always someone else from Berlin, Rome, Paris, Warsaw, Washington who plans things ahead of the locals.

Don't make it a mean EU-communism thingie.

The US is the richest country on earth and had nearly a century on the top time to develop their counties...but still a few rich ones bear alot of poor ones. And you won't accuse the US of commie central planning, won't you!

The EU did quite well in the same time...rebuilding a destroyed continent and spreading wealth and democracy between their members. There is no country worse off than before membership.

We can't have been so bad!

PS: Thank you again for the banking and credit-crisis!
Bratwurst Boy   
5 Jan 2011
News / Why is Poland developing so slowly or in the wrong direction? Who is responsible ? [317]

There you have the problem. Southern Italy is a classic example. Instead of using the resources it has available, it is dependent on aid from the North.

The problem is they don't have the resources nor the industry of the north...and never will have.

You won't make a silicon valley out of Iowa either...the richest country on Earth didn't manage to make all of it's states to rich ones...alot suck and need support from the richer ones.

That's the reality and there is not much we can do about it, outside of becoming a real union, a United States of Europe.

Those who don't want that better leave...or we split...whatever comes first!
Because going on as it is won't work.

Indeed, no one rejects a handout.

These are not given as handouts nor taken as handouts....they are investments and their usage is supervised by an EU-commission. Investments for a better future for all of us, after all you are supposed to take up your duties, being able to pay your share into the common pot soon.
Bratwurst Boy   
5 Jan 2011
News / Why is Poland developing so slowly or in the wrong direction? Who is responsible ? [317]

It's interesting to note that the Western European countries which aren't EU members aren't having too many fiscal problems.

Yeah...the Swiss has always their banks to fall back to, Norway has it's oil....and Poland has?

Brussels knows best? Why would you say that?

"Brüssel" knows nothing! In case you are not aware of it but Brüssel is not much more than the meeting place of a plethora of egos. Where more often than not only the most tiniest common agreement can be subscribed to because a union of 27 so different countries is harder to lead than a sack of fleas.

In the new core-EU the countries know what they want and that they are compatible with each other in their visions, cultures, economies and outlooks.

Only those who fit in will be in!

You are right in that way that you will never made Greece to an industrial competitor...you can pump as much money as you want into an agrarian culture but it won't help much.

That's where the reality destroys the illusion.

The other alternative were that of a permanent transfer union as every country is more or less. Germany has it's Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, the US has it's Iowa, northern Italy has it's South etc..

Every country/union has not so developed territories the richer ones have to pay for. That is a given but that can only work if it's a real union/country...not something in the middle as the EU now is.

So I repeat, the EU will split...Poland has to think about where they want to be.

Is the average Pole doing better than they were 10 years ago? Of course, but then again so is the average Norwegian, Turk, Croatian, Albanian...

Nobody forces Poland to take the help, you know?
Somehow you make it sound as if the support is to blame that Poles are not living better than the Norwegian, the Turk, the Croatian or the Albanian....

Sometimes I wonder about the ways your thoughts wander! ;)
Bratwurst Boy   
4 Jan 2011
News / Why is Poland developing so slowly or in the wrong direction? Who is responsible ? [317]

Maximum mutual benefit for member states. If it is anything else, then it's a complete failure.

It's a pot, open for all members, but to being able to take something out of it it needs to be filled by the members first.

The pot will go empty soon when every member only thinks about his "maximum benefit" of taking out and not putting something back in.

And as the crisis has shown independent economical policies are not the way to go...it's a reason for this mess we are in.

People have to decide where they want to go. I think there will be a split between those who want closer economical and later political union and those who don't.

Honestly I wish for it...I can't stand all this griping and whining anymore about losing your holy "independence" and entering a horrible eternity under the EU whip"!

I belief those countries who will end up in a core-EU with a much closer union will be most successful, compared to those who prefer to muddle along alone.

Or as we in Germany say so nice: "Macht doch euren Scheiß alleine!"
Bratwurst Boy   
4 Jan 2011
News / Why is Poland developing so slowly or in the wrong direction? Who is responsible ? [317]

That should be all a country needs in order to gain maximum benefit out of the EU without having to give up any bit of sovereignty.

If the EU for you is only about "gain maximum benefit" out of it you better leave immediately. Nobody needs or wants sluggards in a union who are not interested in making things work!
Bratwurst Boy   
4 Jan 2011
News / Why is Poland developing so slowly or in the wrong direction? Who is responsible ? [317]

Yeah...well...if the majority wishes so they should get the hell out....and take the Brits with you.
I have enough of you nay sayers and naggers, you grate on all peoples nerves....so make a cut and get out!

There are alot of people who think the enlargement was an error...if you think you will fare better on your own, please do! And we can keep the Billions for ourselves...
Bratwurst Boy   
4 Jan 2011
News / Why is Poland developing so slowly or in the wrong direction? Who is responsible ? [317]

No one leaves a union that works.

Opinion differs what "working" means...

And no, no union will work if there can't be any longterm planning made..no country can work that way.

It's also abit of "in good times and in bad times". If you are only in for the support funds and for the good times you should really rethink the EU. But then nobody will be there for you when you enter bad times alone, on your own!
Bratwurst Boy   
4 Jan 2011
News / Why is Poland developing so slowly or in the wrong direction? Who is responsible ? [317]

Yes.

Oh please...

The USA would stop working if not even their borders or budget were secure long term.

It would make the central government directly accountable to the people.

There is no central government right now (and won't be for a long time to come).
The individual governments are directly accountable to their people...they vote for them (or not).
Bratwurst Boy   
4 Jan 2011
News / Why is Poland developing so slowly or in the wrong direction? Who is responsible ? [317]

Do you think it feasable for the United States of America too? Or any other union?

What if the mood fluctuates? In one year the people vote out...everything gets rolling and some years later they want back? What about the treaties and funds? When people vote out funds have to be returned only to be re-returned when they vote in again?

One year no borders another year borders back???

...that way lays madness! ;)