History /
Why are Jews pestering Poland for "proper" WW2 monetary restitution/reparations? [750]
This thread is not about suicide bombings. I am under no obligation to say anything about them. Harry's claim that my not mentioning Palestinian suicide bombing, in a thread about Jewish demands for WW2 reparations from Poland, proves that I believe Jews are sub humans is completely ridiculous and his "feeling" that I thereby support "the final solution" is an example of completely obnoxious flaming by a person with absolutely no sense of decency, Here we see a "gang of three" doing their worst to take a thread off-topic. Thankfully this forum has members with a sense of decency that try to reason with them:
For what it's worth, the seizure of Palestinian land is what seems to have prompted suicide bombing in Palestine.
This reasoning is unfortunately responded to with yet another off-topic non-sequitor:
one needs to recognise that the USA is even more of an illegitimate state than Israel is.
The moderators are here reading this thread, as one can see by their admonishment of Lzyko in post #334. Why do they allow this flaming and off-topic posting without admonishment, editing, or removal of the posts?
However, I do find it amusing that people who think that Jews are acting disgracefully by asking for compensation for the property they lost to the Polish state also think that Jews are acting disgracefully by refusing to return land to Palestinians.
I certainly have never stated on this thread that individual Jews, with legitimate claims, are acting disgracefully if they seek redress in Polish courts. Harry is putting forth a straw man fallacy if his comments are directed at me, for I agree with 07 zglos sie:
Bottom line is if you lost something in Poland go there and demand compensation in a court and if didn't just f u c k off.
This thread seems to have exposed quite a bit of hypocrisy on the part of those who support Poland paying reparations to Jewish organizations while also supporting the denial of individual Palestinian's property rights.
So in your mixed up logic it's okay if some members of a tribe take from others AND have returned to them what was taken from some other members of their "tribe?"
We all await Harry's answer to this question. Will we get it, or just some more off-topical illogic coupled with unfounded accusations of anti-Semitism?