Love /
Prevention of child abduction by Polish mother. [232]
o you couldnt be arsed to make it to the registry office to register your kids birth, nor did you marry her. Loser.
Why do you automatically assume that he is the one who did not want to marry? Are you one of those women who 'feel' that it's always the man's fault?
I was going to ask her to marry me after she became pregnant because I couldn't think of anything better than being with her and her having our child
rosumiemnic, you should be ashamed of your false assumptions.
f the mother wants to not name you on the birth certificate that is their choice, and not up to me so I will have to go to court to do this which is what I am doing.
Good luck. There is no argument that the system favors women when it comes to these issues. Only a fool would not acknowledge that.
I have offered to pay for the child's needs, and go to visit the child every week to have the door closed in my face.
That says a lot. The mother of your child is obviously jaded.
She decided she wanted to be a single parent, not me. I have done all I could to take responsibility and have taken all of my ex's abuse and not responded to her insults.
That should answer
rozumiemnic's misandrist assumptions.
What would you call it if you were barred from seeing your own child and them being taken away from you and not being told where they were moving to?
I would call it as it is. She is a typical modern spoiled woman who has so many advantages yet will still complain about 'oppression'. If your situation was reversed, you would be considered evil and the 'poor little woman' would be considered a "victim".
YOu offered to pay her money to support the baby? And she turned it down? In that case, she has her reasons.
Yes, of course. A woman always has her reasons and she doesn't even have to give them; after all, she is an "empowered" and "entitled" modern day woman. Only men have to give logical and responsible answers.
I recall a discussion I had at a book club where the women were lambasting a man for "kidnapping" his son. A mere half hour later these same women were sympathetic to a woman who did the same. Only the sexes were reversed. It isn't surprising that people like your critic haven't learn to think outside their limited fishbowl.
Good luck
Anglik, you will need it. In these areas it is men who need "equal rights" and no logical person, male or female can dispute that.