PolishForums LIVE  /  Archives [3]    
   
Posts by lesser  

Joined: 19 Oct 2007 / Male ♂
Last Post: 7 Jul 2018
Threads: Total: 4 / In This Archive: 0
Posts: Total: 1311 / In This Archive: 177
From: Poland, Gdansk

Displayed posts: 177 / page 4 of 6
sort: Latest first   Oldest first   |
lesser   
11 Feb 2009
News / Poland Should Beef Up Military [286]

That the french were to "soft" is just ridiculous

Really?
How much reparations German state paid?
Unwillingness to confirm Polish western border raised German hopes up.
Ruined state was allowed to arm itself very quickly, despite they saw radical Hitler.
German army crossed demilitarized zone and nothing happened.
Later no reaction about Austria and selling out Czechoslovakia.

Everything lead to WWII.
lesser   
10 Feb 2009
News / Poland Should Beef Up Military [286]

lesser:
While the French are responsible for too soft police towards Germany after Versailles.

You're an idiot lesser and now I know that the EU will be fine...

Please elaborate your position, because this personal attack dont tell us much why you disagree with me. Be sure that I can defend my statement.
lesser   
10 Feb 2009
News / Poland Should Beef Up Military [286]

You have it now and you should stop your whining about the war already!

The biggest amount of WWII whiners is in the Germany, they provoke this discussion in Poland and the Czech Republic.
lesser   
10 Feb 2009
News / Poland Should Beef Up Military [286]

PS: All over Europe this Treaty is seen now as a fault and a disaster but not in Poland, that should tell you something...

Well... Poland should be offered Eastern Prussia and GdaƄsk as well. This would stop plans of German expansion to the east in longer run. British PM is to blame here, he considered Poland to be French ally... While the French are responsible for too soft policy towards Germany after Versailles.

Wasn't it Dmowski who dreamed already before WWII of a only-Poles Poland???

General rule of treaty of Versailles was to create national states. Mainly because of Wilson.
lesser   
10 Feb 2009
News / Poland Should Beef Up Military [286]

How far will Poland come alone against the future american and asian blocs?

Why do you think that Poland should go against any of such blocks? even if something like that would appear

Yeah to bad they don't have a genius "know-it-all-and-better" like you in their ranks, isn't it? heh

For your information, there are many of such people that could replace them. However this mafia wont let them to work if they don't share their visions. Just 'modern' people like you don't see it.
lesser   
10 Feb 2009
News / Poland Should Beef Up Military [286]

The majority is pro-EU and modern.

Modern doesn't mean of good quality. Anyway there is no sense to talk about masses, world was always pushed forward by elites. Simply our current elites are of very poor quality and this is the problem with the EU. Very bad construction build by intellectual zeros .
lesser   
10 Feb 2009
News / Poland Should Beef Up Military [286]

What's wrong with it?

What is wrong about building empires?

Still no answer...

And still no reason for why do you need nukes! Interesting...

How is that? I suggested that your views are caused by your incompetence in these matters. How could I argue with delusions?

While earlier I have wrote that Poland need nukes to keep peace, forever.
lesser   
10 Feb 2009
News / Poland Should Beef Up Military [286]

Well...they DID stir up tensions!

They also claimed to be anti-EU to got more votes from EU sceptics. In fact they do everything what eurocrats expect them to do. Today's politicians are very far from idealistic ideologies, demagogy is widespread and everything they care is re-election and cash.

If you are really for serious, then I'm afraid that your poor knowledge if polish politics move our discussion to fantasy world.
lesser   
9 Feb 2009
News / Poland Should Beef Up Military [286]

Well...your former Kaczynski duo showed to the contrary that Poland likes very well to stir up tensions!

Imagine they would had had nukes....

His foreign policy was really foolish, he was provoking both Germany and Russia. Of course it have nothing to do with Poland possibly holding nukes. His statement were just part of election demagogy. I don't even know why you write this last comment, unless just to provoke some hot-headed posters.
lesser   
9 Feb 2009
News / Poland Should Beef Up Military [286]

Well, steps have already been taken in that regard although the overall commitment to that process is somewhat dubious.

Eurocrats build their empire using tactic of little steps, so this is just question of time.
lesser   
9 Feb 2009
News / Poland Should Beef Up Military [286]

What makes you say that?
You surely have reasons, don't you...

Just prevention, something that should not be spoken publicly by Polish officials. Poland have no interest to stir up any tensions and certainly should be keep out from involvement in military conflicts. Nuclear weapon or possibly other kind of weapon with similar power is the best guarantee of peace.

You are asking the impossible, lesser. They are in bed with America and can't see that they are being used.

Don't forget about their willingness to build EU army.
lesser   
9 Feb 2009
News / Poland Should Beef Up Military [286]

Since almost every continent has nuclear weapons who could wipe out the planet of earth in less then 1 hour.

Continents have not any nuclear weapons but some states, Poland is not among them. However I agree, this is waste of cash if our politicians would spend too much on conventional army. Our potential enemies (in longer perspective) are as usual Germany and Russia, the latter already have nuclear weapons. Germany would join them quickly if they will need. Polish politicians should for once proof me wrong and finally show that they are not completely useless corrupt sellouts.
lesser   
21 Dec 2008
News / What is Poland's politics towards Norway? [56]

Norwegian politics sucks. So do all the other socialistic politics.

You know, the largest party in Norway is a Right wing "Radical" party?
Only thing that other parties unite together so that the "Radicals" won't have the power ;)

Could you please elaborate about this 'radical' party. Whether they are indeed radicals and why Grunwald consider them to be right wing? This is very hard to find reasonable source about Norwegian politics in Poland.
lesser   
30 Nov 2008
Life / Importance of Religion in Poland [187]

Among Catholics there is many people who know little about Catholicism. Of course higher awareness would be great, however there is line that some cannot cross. How little people know about economy, while we don't demand books on this subject to be burned. I belong to those old-fashioned people whom prefer quality over number but I don't expect from average person to have knowledge equal to professor of economy.

As far as we talk about pure believe, there is little sense to discuss why you chose one over other. There is no scientific evidence to refer. That is why people mostly continue family traditions. However those smarter should raise above them and analyse sociological consequences of choosing certain denomination. I did this and I see the Catholic church to be the best guarantee of reason.
lesser   
9 Nov 2008
News / GERMANS WANT TO GERMANIZE KOPERNIK (COPERNICUS)! OUTRAGE! [1016]

The Copernicus manuscript book states : [...] Nicolaus Copernicus Canon [in] Warmia, in Prussia Germaniae mathematician...(Nicolai Copernick Canonici Varmiensis, in Borussia Germaniae mathematici)

What is the source? This fragment have little sense, why not to reveal whole quote to understand the context?

Anyway, if you really consider him to be German, then he must be also awful traitor of German nation. Right? :) I read that German National Socialists also claimed that Copernicus was 'purely German'. I fail to understand why they wanted such a traitor of 'Germanic race' being recognized 'German'. :)
lesser   
8 Nov 2008
News / GERMANS WANT TO GERMANIZE KOPERNIK (COPERNICUS)! OUTRAGE! [1016]

You know..let's count...it's about people who share the same:

The past of different tribes which became part of Germany, may be considered as a heritage of German nation. However this doesn't make 'the Germans' out of those people, this is just how nationalist propaganda describe them.
lesser   
8 Nov 2008
News / GERMANS WANT TO GERMANIZE KOPERNIK (COPERNICUS)! OUTRAGE! [1016]

But tell me...why are you discarding the Battle of the Teutoburger Wald as a sign of clear national consciousness?

Because this is nothing more than some rulers having common interest. While you again confuse royalist loyalty with national loyalty.
lesser   
8 Nov 2008
News / GERMANS WANT TO GERMANIZE KOPERNIK (COPERNICUS)! OUTRAGE! [1016]

Good point, it might be sometime around German unification ?

That's unlogical...without a german nationality before there wouldn't had been a unification! Why not saying "5 years back"...."yesterday"???

This (pan-germanism) was something close to pan-Slavism , some propagandists spread such idea and with time it succeed. BB, do you want to say that Germany was united democratically? :)
lesser   
8 Nov 2008
News / GERMANS WANT TO GERMANIZE KOPERNIK (COPERNICUS)! OUTRAGE! [1016]

Austrians made up their "Austrianness" after WW II when it wasnt such hot sh*t to be German anymore. The "German germans" at least admitted their guilt.

Even if, doesn't matter. Language is not deciding factor even today.

When the Germans formed their national identify?
lesser   
8 Nov 2008
News / GERMANS WANT TO GERMANIZE KOPERNIK (COPERNICUS)! OUTRAGE! [1016]

This concept have nothing to do with Copernicus. Otherwise he would not be loyal to the certain crown.

People, come on, how long you will ignore the difference between our times and period when he lived?

The language formed national identifies among people (especially in Central Europe) much later. Still, this is not any deciding criteria even in our times, look at Austrians or German speaking people in Switzerland. They don't consider themselves 'German'.
lesser   
8 Nov 2008
News / GERMANS WANT TO GERMANIZE KOPERNIK (COPERNICUS)! OUTRAGE! [1016]

People look at this issue from a biased perspective of our times. At that times there was no developed concept of nationality, while Copernicus was just loyal servant of Polish king. Nationality is how you consider yourself and not how others think about you.
lesser   
15 Sep 2008
History / Life in communism vs democracy in Poland [234]

As for democracy, I think educated people can make educated decisions.

This is correct statement however solve nothing. I could ask who are the educators and what kind of program they realize.

Smart people can make smart decision, while they are in minority and always will be. Thus general effect of democratic rule might be shamelessly average at best.
lesser   
14 Sep 2008
History / Life in communism vs democracy in Poland [234]

If you have an expensive car than it should definitely be made public property so i could have it :)

You would get nothing unless you would be high ranking communist apparatchik.

He's kidding around.

He often trolling, I know. However he made many anti-free market comments before.
lesser   
14 Sep 2008
History / Life in communism vs democracy in Poland [234]

Its like choosing between the theif and the robber :P ... but then... i think theif is better than the robber, as often the theif dont murder! Isnt that what you mean?

Yes, this is close comparison.

Dekameron

Your assumptions are completely false. I do support Laissez-faire capitalism... Anyway if I describe some certain political system this doesn't mean that I'm for or against. My personal preferences? This is topic for another thread if you are really interested. I have nothing to hide.

There is another way to look at it, that it is not the human which is flawed but the theory.

Obviously this is correct interpretation. Some wonder whether people who prefer public property over private property are really humans. :)

you think that communism is in the past? I think it's a huge mistake, we are still on the way, still on the way Sean!

On the way? where?
lesser   
14 Sep 2008
History / Life in communism vs democracy in Poland [234]

So called 'democracy' present especially in many countries of the 'western world' is just an illusion like Dariusz mentioned above. However this is much better than communism and this is out of question for anybody who lived under these two systems. First system is just a huge scam while the second could be compared to unforgettable crime.
lesser   
7 Sep 2008
News / 10,000 ISRAELIS READY TO CLAIM FOR POLISH CITIZENSHIP AND POLISH LAND! [628]

So, what is white in them except their skin?

The point is that 'white' is just about skin and nothing else. If you want to refer to other issues then you should use other words.

``Hardly is there a nation which has met with a sadder fate than the Serbians.``

This is cult of victimhood, this is romantic cult of merits for others whom betrayed. I don't see your country to be able to stand from the knees if such quotes are very popular among the Serbs. This is a serious problem among some groups in Poland as well. Real politics does counts not any romantic past. In other thread I write that I started to read book of pre-WWII Polish politician Roman Dmowski. You should read his books too, I read just part of the first chapter and I already know that he was political realist, not a romanticist! To encourage you, I just write that he supported alliance with Russia against Germany.
lesser   
7 Sep 2008
News / 10,000 ISRAELIS READY TO CLAIM FOR POLISH CITIZENSHIP AND POLISH LAND! [628]

When I see white person, although I don't think about race, I automatically acknowledge the fact that this person is white. This is not the case with you. For you this is not enough to have white color of the skin to talk about 'white person'.

Your historic lecture is very selective, did you forget that Slavs came to Europe from Asia? Why to discuss such prehistoric issues at all? Don't you have enough of serious problems these days?