News / Poland blocks any action on climate change [569]


Nope. To feed their own. That's the primary objective.


Now we are on the same side of the table. It is sick that when our GDP is not up 3% we see it as a failure. How about zero. I mean everything, and no immigration. If the Americans can't fu*ck enough to keep the population constant, they should have that right. Maybe the US would be a better place with 100 million.

News / Poland blocks any action on climate change [569]


But the legal process is different. If you mean morally, you are absolutely correct.

News / Poland blocks any action on climate change [569]


No, his not. Husband is responsible by default. If he want to prove that the kid is not his, it's his burden.
An unmarried sperm donor is not responsible by default, as there is no default. There are 2 billion men out there she could name as the "father".

That is why if she wants to prove that the kid is his, it's her burden to prove it, not his to prove that it's not, which requires a court order to make his DNA available for testing.

At least this is how it works in the civilized countries.

News / Poland blocks any action on climate change [569]


Marriage means a guy who is legally responsible for the child. Random one-night stands or "boyfriends" who can walk put an impossible burden on the rest of us to find "daddy".

Lacking that guy, a woman is more likely to abort if she makes minimum wage and is already a single mother.


Then, she will find out how babies are made. If she drives drunk and kills somebody, she will learn what happens when you drive drunk. And what the seatbelts are for - a condom for driving. Abortion rights were not meant for drunks.

News / Poland blocks any action on climate change [569]

Abortion is not the same as having fewer kids. No, I am not pro-choice.
Well, actually, I am if "pro-choice" means choosing when to fu*ck and when not to. Like when a woman is unmarried, drunk, or both.

News / Poland blocks any action on climate change [569]

I haven't seen "smog" in the Chicago area for decades. Are we here an exception?

News / Poland blocks any action on climate change [569]


That was honest and brilliant.


Ditto. I can't stand when the guys, like popes, with zero responsibility and accountability shoot their mouths off on the subject.


I don't expect morality in a leftist any more than I would compassion from a child rapist. It's the passive masses, looking, seeing, and not reacting that I find disgusting.

The "whatever" people.

News / Poland blocks any action on climate change [569]


Between euthanasia, abortion, and the many wars, where is that high moral ground we claim to be occupying? Still looking...

News / Poland blocks any action on climate change [569]


Before we apply the Auschwitz method of population control, may I suggest that we stop feeding Africa and admitting the low-carbon, third-world useless people into the high-carbon, high-consumption societies where the low-consumption migrants become the high-consumption welfare deadbeats. And their many, many kids who will have truckloads of their own consuming like locust.

Am I brilliant or what?

News / Poland blocks any action on climate change [569]


Because she knows that all she would get is middle finger from both. Only whites can be guilted into action. The problem is what action to keep the ugly GW girl and the tools like her happy - over and beyond what the whites are already doing. Which is a lot.


Not nice wishing 6 billion people dead. Not nice at all.
Do you have kids? If so, did you tell them not to have kids of their own?
You don't have to answer. That was rhetorical.

News / Poland blocks any action on climate change [569]


They are running away from the multicultural crap, not from high water.

What dreams do you have? Keep in mind that this is a family website and there may be some minors here reading.

Life / Importance of Religion in Poland [187]

I support religion in its many forms because I don't see the down side. As long, of course, as the fanatics can't use me for bonfire the way they used.

That is no more inconsistent that smokers hating other smokers or drunks hating other drunks. Smart atheists, smokers, and drunks want to be a tiny minority.

News / Poland blocks any action on climate change [569]


Being idealistic is a form of mental disorder of which the main side effect is being a moron looking up to the sky while stepping into sh*it on the sidewalk. This is where the adults have a critical role to play when it's time to clean up - both the sidewalk and the shoes.


I agree. It must be those poor low-IQ Americans who can't afford New Zealand who are buying the multi-zero properties in Florida and on Long Island.

News / Poland blocks any action on climate change [569]

They may have a clue but most are still too scared to say out loud what it is. And will remain in that state until the number of useful idiots exceeds the critical mass.

News / Poland blocks any action on climate change [569]

I am shaking in my boots and waiting for what that "something" - as in "let's do something" - is.
In the meantime, the rich and the beautiful are buying ocean-front properties for the amounts with more zeros than in a box of Cheerios.
They must be unaware that in 18 months their multi-bedroom homes will be fish tanks.


....and those who can read the 2nd Amendment and the Supreme Court rulings on the subject. It sucks to be able to read and understand such offensive material.

News / Poland blocks any action on climate change [569]

No, it's not. She was and still is a tool. The last thing we want is to make life-altering decisions based on one kid's dreams and fears.

Do you remember that stupid woman telling the world in her speech to the UN how the terrible Iraqi soldiers were throwing Kuwaiti babies out of incubators? She lied. Never happened. As we call it today, it was fake news. But it sure brought many adult naive suckers to tears.

The problem was that that tool helped the US get into the Gulf 1 with all the expense, deaths, wounds, and destruction.
So, no, I am not impressed with the "idealistic kids" that spew crap fed to them by their adult minders and manipulators.

The fact that the global warming kid is extraordinarily ugly makes the whole show even more repulsive and her a lot less credible as a person having nothing else going for her.

She had to find her cause, which just happens to be so complex that a battalion of climate PH.D's and a brigade of MBA's can't easily decide what to do about other than "something". So, let's consult a kid who should be in her bedroom gossipping about boys on Facebook.

Next year, it will be frogs in Africa.

News / Poland blocks any action on climate change [569]

Of kids and global warming continued...
From dailymail.com:

Greta Thunberg condemns her 'haters' after they 'go after me for my looks, behavior and differences', and says her critics 'must feel threatened' by her

No, dear, we don't feel threatened. We feel sorry for you. You see, ugly people would rather hide. You chose to be in our cringing faces. To make things even worse, you are stupid or pretending to be one. That's two strikes. Not a good combination to succeed.

News / Poland blocks any action on climate change [569]

Global warming religion has become child abuse. From nationalreview.com:

Instead, they feed the kids a diet of apocalyptic warnings that children repeat back as if they were urgent insights. One speaker at the youth climate rally in Washington, D.C., last week said that we have just 18 months - yes, only until the beginning of 2021 - to forestall irreversible environmental harms.

The case of adult morons using teenage morons as propaganda tools - something we are not allowed to criticize because that would be mean.

News / Poland blocks any action on climate change [569]

Here is a summary only a genius like me can come up with.
Life on Earth will end. No doubt about it. The question is: do we who live now owe anything to those who will be born 10,000 years from now? If so, what?

My answer is: We owe them nothing.

That is why the global warming useful idiots always predict something oh so awful soon enough to scare the fu*ck out of the gullible masses so that they, pushed at home by their even dumber kids, will vote their own demise TODAY and peacefully hand over the kind of power to the ruling classes that only bloody revolutions managed in the past.

That's the real reason for that faked up urgency where none exists.

News / Poland blocks any action on climate change [569]


That was way back. Today, personal behavior is out. Government's iron fist is what the Dems want.


I am already doing your list, but not because of the global warming zealots.



No, because they don't give a crap about one degree up in 100 years, either. In fact, they like going to Florida for 50 degrees F up in three hours.

Like I said, liberals' favorite scientist, Darwin, will take care of it the surplus people just as Roe v Wade took care of the unwanted ones.

While we are on the subject of global warming, they should have a special consolation prize for the kid who is the world's dumbest and the ugliest at the same time.

From cnbc.com:
cnbc.com/2019/09/24/how-greta-thunbergs-rise-could-backfire-on-environmentalists.html

and the headline:

How 16-year-old Greta Thunberg's rise could backfire on environmentalists

It's painful to see that picture.

News / Poland blocks any action on climate change [569]


I know. I asked this question as a test and made it deliberately simple: if money could fix the global warming problem, how much would you be willing to spend?

My intention, of course, was to expose the global warming virtue signalling bull*shitters that talk big about the end of life unless "we do something" but would spend anything to fix it because they know it's Gore-class scam. So, naturally, that gives me the right to ask such a question.

The answer to my own question is: not even a dime. I don't give a sh*it if the earth temp is up a degree C in 100 years. I want my 8 banger Lexus (actually two) now and my AC thermostat at 74 when it's hot. If human life ends ten seconds earlier because of my actions rather than in 10,000 years, tough.

As Dirk posted, people will adapt. Or die. Darwin at work.

Life / Importance of Religion in Poland [187]


If the Church and state were really separated, the state wouldn't recognize its existence in the same manner the state does not recognize comedy clubs.

News / Poland blocks any action on climate change [569]


What environmental laws in the US are not tight enough?


Do you have your own generator? What model and where did you buy it?


Agreed. I would add the lead in the car batteries.


How much would you be willing to pay in taxes or expenses to reduce the global temp by half a degree C in 100 years? This calls for a number. No essays.

News / Poland blocks any action on climate change [569]

My post was prompted by that "we" in 424 by TheOther.
Chemicals in water is a separate issue and about 1000 times more important than the "global warming" because they, the chemicals, kill very quickly - not maybe 1000 years later.

News / Poland blocks any action on climate change [569]


...by doing the following:

1.
2.
3.

Just fill in the blanks.

News / Poland blocks any action on climate change [569]


...because the US does not make anything consumers want. Go to Walmart and find just one item made in the USA.


...just like the US, the country that sent its manufacturing and the pollution to China. A brilliant way to make a buck and to point fingers at China at the same time.

You want China to stop polluting? Stop buy Chinese gadgets and make them here.

News / Poland blocks any action on climate change [569]


These global warming useful idiots pi*ss the hell out of me. They will deny the obvious. They will lie. They will ignore China and India, but blame the US for everything.

Why? Because that is where the money is.

If Trump did absolutely nothing other than to give them middle finger in Paris, he will be remembered as a great president.

News / Poland blocks any action on climate change [569]


OK. But it's still local and anecdotal. What matters is the total heat in the earth. Without proof, why would it be impossible for the heat carried by the oceanic streams to relocate from the equatorial Atlantic to the North Pole for a couple of decades and then go back?

How about the Antarctica? Has the ice been melting away there? I will spare you the suspense. No, it's actually been expending. If you google the subject, you get this:

In East Antarctica, the ice sheet rests on a major land mass, while in West Antarctica the bed can extend to more than 2,500 m below sea level. In contrast to the melting of the Arctic sea ice, sea ice around Antarctica has been expanding as of 2013.

Duh!

But the global warmers are very adept at finding spots that suit their lying narratives. So, if the heat moves from A to B and back, they will tell us how ice at B is melting but nothing about A getting more ice. And vice versa. Such is the perversion they peddle as science. Just as they never talk about how many birds get killed every year by the wind mills.

News / Poland blocks any action on climate change [569]


And you shouldn't because the question was addressed to a global warming zealot before you joined.

Here is the answer to my question: Yes. There was a period when the earth was hotter than now.

From wattsupwiththat.com, you can clearly see that first industrial revolution that caused flooding and starvation until 860.

And then Al Gore prototype came and told the masses to repent and quit burning oil and the earth was saved.

• 
  temperature.jpg
  

News / Poland blocks any action on climate change [569]


Am I the only one speaking English here? I am asking what happened in the PAST. There are all kinds of objects that can testify to what climate and temperatures were observable in the PAST. I am not denying anything. You just pretend you don't get my question. Plus, as I already wrote, THERE ARE NO CLIMATE CHANGE DENIERS!!! Got it?


Again, is my English that bad that a short question like "In the last 2000 years, was the earth hotter?" is confusing? Where did I hypothesize anything?

Just asking about the PAST.