PolishForums LIVE  /  Archives [3]    
   
Posts by delphiandomine  

Joined: 25 Nov 2008 / Male ♂
Warnings: 1 - Q
Last Post: 17 Feb 2021
Threads: Total: 86 / In This Archive: 69
Posts: Total: 17823 / In This Archive: 12419
From: Poznań, Poland
Speaks Polish?: Yeah.
Interests: law, business

Displayed posts: 12488 / page 385 of 417
sort: Latest first   Oldest first   |
delphiandomine   
14 Jun 2010
Work / Professional development for teachers? the options in Poland? [11]

Let me understand this, you think that when they bring the VAT increase in that people will magically want to stop learninng English?

When course costs either have to go up by 22% or teachers salaries have to go down by a similar amount - then you're going to see a reduction in the amount of people learning English. Schools doing mostly corporate training will be fine - but it always has been an unreliable job. I know someone who was teaching at a company that was absolutely happy with him, loved him, the school loved him - everything was perfect. Until of course, the big cheeses from Germany turned up and told them to get cheaper teachers. Not an uncommon story, especially with more expensive schools.

Or we could talk about the mid-sized Polish company (around 100 employees) who were very happy with a school where I used to work. All of the employees had classes, all was fine and well - until of course, the director felt that the school wasn't providing value for money. Bye bye contract.

Or maybe - we could talk about how 22% on courses means that schools will be starting to aggressively go after corporate clients as they won't be bothered about VAT being charged on courses. End result = lower wages for native corporate teachers as everyone will want a piece of the action.

It is demand that aggregates all market forces and there certainly is enough demand for language training in Poland, Language knowledge is one of Poland's critical success factors (HP and IBM both consder it so). Besides, A lot of my teaching is to corporate clients who aren't too concentrated on the bottom line since language training is a relatively small expenditure that brings tangible rewards.

Corporate training is very whimsical though - just because your school has nice contracts at the minute doesn't mean that they will have them tomorrow. I certainly wouldn't call corporate teaching stable - where will you be if your school hasn't got long term agreements in place and a competitor takes their classes? The smart teacher knows that the industry isn't stable at all - for instance, I was negotiating to take over classes from a well known school here, simply because I could supply myself for a few zloty cheaper than the school could supply a native. Of course - it didn't hurt that I knew someone who knew the director of the company ;)

I am considering my MA at either Wrocław Universytet or in Poznan,

There are some MA's at UAM that are worthwhile, but again - why bother with a Polish MA when you can obtain a far more credible British MA by distance learning that's actually worth something on the world scale?

But the question remains, what are the options for professional development?

Very little, really. From what I know, most people do either an MA through distance learning from a British university (set price, doesn't mention "distance" on the certificate) or the DELTA if they want to expand further. There are sometimes workshops organised by the publishers, but they're pretty dire - I haven't seen one in Poznan worth going to yet.

Really, professional development is either an MA through a reputable place (and not a diploma factory, like the vast majority of Polish universities) or the DELTA.
delphiandomine   
13 Jun 2010
Work / Study (M.SC microbiology) and part time work in Poland [4]

Quoted for truth.

It's harsh - but I've seen and heard plenty of stories involving Asian students who thought that they could survive here. The ones that did survive are the ones who had rich parents who didn't need to borrow the money for their fees.

how much will i earn in a week

Maximum of 200zl a week. I'd also doubt that you would have any chance of passing microbiology in a Polish university if you work full time on top.
delphiandomine   
13 Jun 2010
Work / Professional development for teachers? the options in Poland? [11]

it is secure

Where on earth are you working that is so secure? With the proposal to stick VAT onto education, nothing is secure in relation to schools at the minute. I know at least two schools have closed in Poznan already because of this, and at least one more is considering closing down this summer instead of risking financial disaster if they do bring in VAT.

I have a BA Economics and I am considering studying for my MA in English here in Wro.

It really isn't worth anything - unless you get it from the best State university in the city. Don't even bother with a private university one - it's worthless.

I considered doing the DELTA but to be honest I didn't think much of my CELTA course so I'm not prepared to spend the money.

The DELTA is the de facto school management qualification - it won't get you more money in Poland (okay, so it depends how much you earn at the minute) - but it will open doors if you want to consider management jobs. It'll also be very useful abroad - for instance, summer camps in the UK think highly of the DELTA.
delphiandomine   
11 Jun 2010
Work / How is the Warsaw job opportunities for international students? [43]

Polish Companies do not want foreign students to work in their companies cause of ZUS

What has ZUS got to do with foreign students working there?

One time I had a pleasure of working with a guy from India. He was a newbe engineer that thought that picking up a 'scope probe was below him. It was a technician's job.

Oh yes. They have very, very funny ideas about their place in society - and many of them behave like they know better, even when working in menial jobs in Western Europe.

I can't imagine hiring and international student from India, obviously a higher caste, to clean anyone's house.

I can - because many of them have enough money to pay for the fees and no more.
delphiandomine   
11 Jun 2010
Work / How is the Warsaw job opportunities for international students? [43]

There is something called decency. Taking advantage of people who clean your mess is just not decent.

It's only taking advantage if they have to do something that isn't agreed or fair. If he (or anyone) agrees to work for 5zl an hour, then it's their choice to do so. It wouldn't be fair to expect them to answer the phone, for instance.

Anyway, as I said, the rate is minimum 10 zl. in Warsaw.

Minimum? The only minimum is what the law says - which is about what, 5.5zl an hour after tax?

I don't even want to start with "you get what you pay for."

Not arguing with you there ;)

Anyway, in my experience, workers from the Indian sub-continent tend to have major emotional problems for some bizzare reason - they're very, very sensitive people and more trouble than they're worth.
delphiandomine   
11 Jun 2010
Law / How to register a new business in Poland [129]

mBank are solely electronic, are they not?

They are fantastic if you don't expect anything of them - for instance, their system works, I don't have problems and it's generally reliable. There's also always an English speaking advisor on the phone if you have any questions.

But if you have anything more than quite simple requirements, I'd give them a miss - my impression is that they are fantastic at providing basic facilities, but not so great with providing advice in English about overdrafts/etc.
delphiandomine   
11 Jun 2010
Work / How is the Warsaw job opportunities for international students? [43]

Are you Scottish?. Poles pay at least 10.

Yes, I am actually.

Why pay more for someone who is desperate to work and will work for anything? Doesn't make any sense at all!

Yes, but 5 is slavery.

Doesn't bother me. If someone is stupid enough to come to Poland, expecting to get a lucrative part time job to fund their stay here, then they deserve all they get - which is nothing but very low level work paying peanuts.
delphiandomine   
11 Jun 2010
Law / How to register a new business in Poland [129]

Quite a few here have their own business. Which bank would you say is the best for small businesses?

mBank is perfect for me - it's no good for businesses which need to handle lots of cash, but it's very very good for small businesses that rarely deal with physical cash.
delphiandomine   
11 Jun 2010
Work / How is the Warsaw job opportunities for international students? [43]

Forget it. No-one is going to employ someone from Asia when there's plenty of Polish students needing jobs. You might find someone (like me, for instance) willing to give you 5zl an hour to clean their flat, but that's about as good as you can hope for.

I know someone in your situation working (illegally) for 4zl an hour.
delphiandomine   
10 Jun 2010
Study / Any one know about WARSAW INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE & Is it good one ? [13]

After my higher studies can i apply for poland PR (Permanannt recidency) ?

No. No European country to my knowledge accepts time spent studying as being permanently in the country - you will have to apply for a residence card on the basis of full time employment in Poland.
delphiandomine   
10 Jun 2010
News / Father Popiełuszko beatified in Warsaw [28]

You may or may not know that committees of Soldiarity with the Chechen have been active in Kraków, Warsaw and Poznań.

Not a bad idea either. The Chechens are no allies of the West - after all, their use of suicide bombs is hardly compatible with the Western idea of civilisation.

Unless of course, you want extremists in Poland - personally, I'd rather they were kept in Russia.

Define solely, and tell what the difference does it make?

Doesn't make any difference, the guy was still murdered. But I'm sick to death of all this IT WAS RUSSIA, even when it clearly wasn't. Poles simply cannot accept that their own can be just as bad - look at the outrage over the theft at Smolensk, yet many people deny that Poles did exactly the same thing before.
delphiandomine   
10 Jun 2010
News / Father Popiełuszko beatified in Warsaw [28]

Polonius wants to cut his own throat.

You're telling me. I'd much rather have Chechyna controlled by Moscow than risk another tiny Muslim republic with no self control whatsoever.

The IPN (a Polish state institution investigating crimes against Poland).

Well, they couldn't possibly admit that Poles were solely responsible for killing Poles, could they?

Poland is important to Russia, make no mistake about it from your Scottish perspective

Is it really important? The way that they bypassed Poland to build the Nord Stream suggests to me that they really couldn't care less about Poland these days. Perhaps it was important once, but nowadays? I see lots of posturing from Poland towards Russia, but very little in return.
delphiandomine   
9 Jun 2010
News / Decoded talks inside Poland's president's plane are released in Internet [337]

Gah, don't even get me started on that issue.

Part of the problem is the ILS at Aberdeen is rubbish - only Cat I. Then the other part of the problem is the runway - though seemingly, a 300m extension will happen. But as long as BAA are running the show, I can't see a Polish flight happening, just too expensive for the likes of Ryanair et al.
delphiandomine   
9 Jun 2010
News / Decoded talks inside Poland's president's plane are released in Internet [337]

One even suggested a 'scud run' through a dip. He lost me with that comment.

A scud run is essentially when you go down very low and attempt to visually spot the runway - with the danger that you can end up putting the plane onto the ground as you have very little room to play with.

There was previous form for that move - the transcript suggests that the Captain alluded to having done it in Gdansk before.

Please try and get hold of Newsweek as I see this as a credible source.

I'll have a look, I'd like to see this article for myself. It's a bit strange that Newsweek has came out with it - it's not a popular opinion at all. You're right though, Newsweek is fairly credible.
delphiandomine   
9 Jun 2010
News / Father Popiełuszko beatified in Warsaw [28]

Now the Muscovites are manipulating information about the black boxes.

Really? How do you think Moscow is manipulating the contents of the third black box, which they couldn't decode and gave to the Polish almost straight away to do so?

By what right are they keeping Chcehens in post-Soviet bondage? Let them be free!

Really? You want another tinpot Muslim state, run by extremists who will be no allies of Western civilisation? Chechens are anything but sweetness and light!

They flubbed the papal assassination attempt, but in 1984 they succeeded with the Polish priest.

That's only if you believe that he was important enough to even be noticed by the Kremlin.

This Polish habit of over-estimating their own importance is really starting to get on my nerves.
delphiandomine   
9 Jun 2010
News / Decoded talks inside Poland's president's plane are released in Internet [337]

What are you talking about? What discrepancy?

I'm leaving it for you and the other conspiracy theorists to work out. Don't want to make your life easy, after all!

Is this something based on Russian transcript and version of events

As far as I'm aware, the Polish/Russian/English transcripts available are all very good translations. The discrepancy certainly isn't a translation issue.
delphiandomine   
9 Jun 2010
News / Decoded talks inside Poland's president's plane are released in Internet [337]

Then why was nothing done?? The descent was clearly wrong and it wasn't corrected.

Because - they were cleared from 500m to 100m. How the plane gets there was nothing to do with ATC - they were left to decide themselves, in line with the advisory role that ATC had at Smolensk-North.

The ATC had the tools for measuring the speed so that puts that to rest.

They didn't. The Russians, from the first moment, have consistently said that there was no such equipment installed at Smolensk-North. And why would there be, when it was a shell of an airport, decommissioned and effectively useless for all but good conditions?

The conditions in the dips saw air masses which had a material effect on the descent speed. Simple!

I'm still wondering where you heard about these conditions, because it's not reported anywhere credible.

I saw the same on that website for pilots so I know pilots believe the same.

Most people on pprune believe that the pilot put the plane into the ground.

The whole point is that ATC didn't lose track of the plane which they could see was too low.

Sure, they didn't lose track. They actually told them to level off (Horizon) within 3.8 seconds of the plane leaving 100m according to the transcript. That's about as quick as you can expect them to react, given that radar isn't instantly updating and that the human brain needs to process the information in front of it.

The plane wasn't too low until it went below 100m. In fact, from what I can see, the plane went too low for 16 seconds. The ATC responded within 4 seconds - of course, it was too late, but it was the crew's responsibility to keep that plane at 100m, no-one elses.

Perhaps ask yourself - why didn't the pilot turn off the autopilot as soon as he knew that they had gone below 100m? There was a good 8 second gap between that information and the autopilot being turned off - more than enough time to pull on the control stick.

They didn't remove it for Tusk or the Polish journalists who arrived on 2 separate days. Doesn't that strike you as odd?

That's another unfounded rumour.

When you can see that sb is in trouble, do you stand aside?

No, when your radar screen updates, you process the information and give them the instruction to level off (Horizon). Unfortunately, it was too late - but that's what happens when you mess around in an airliner below 100m.

Delph, come on, they are fully aware of the local conditions there and how the terrain impacts on landings.

So why did they attempt such a risky landing, without an ILS, in a place known to have difficult local conditions and fog on top?

They were mistaken as to their true location, you will see that I'm sure from the second decoding session.

I'm wondering what will change - we know that the pilot willingly went below 100m (the autopilot tells us a lot!).

The point is, they did. Their markers are for ground-level height, not the dips and it is this which caused the inaccuracy and ultimate crash.

Why would you fly into the dips if you're supposed to be above the markers? Don't forget - the inner marker was located after that dip, so what the hell were they doing below the marker?

There is a point that perhaps, they intended to simply fly to 100m, then go missed and divert. But if so - why did the captain not turn off the autopilot and fly away after hearing "100"? It wasn't too late at that point, dip or no dip.

Still, the GPS track combined with the other two black boxes will tell us all.
delphiandomine   
9 Jun 2010
News / Decoded talks inside Poland's president's plane are released in Internet [337]

Look at the descent rates, Delph. The area that they went into had a material effect on that. There are some comments online to support that.

Perhaps looking at the raw data, you can come to the conclusion that there was something wrong with the descent rates. But in that case - wouldn't you expect someone to say something, particularly if the descent rate wasn't what was expected? I'm damn sure that a pilot would notice the difference between 3.5m/s and 8m/s.

However, such corrective action wasn't suggested by the ATC, was it?

The ATC had no real way of knowing m/s speed - and by the time they realised that something was wrong (and issued the Horizon request) - it was possibly too late.

The atmospheric conditions in that area created the distortion. They wreaked havoc with the meters, sth that the Russian ATC should have seen or surmised.

I'm struggling to get this - are you claiming that air pockets cause distortion of not only radar, but barometric altimeters?

Well, they were working due to a full inspection before take off but they faultered when they encountered that terrain and atmosphere.

Strange - I haven't heard about this phenomenon elsewhere. Convex, or any other pilot - do you know anything about altimeters showing false readings due to air pockets?

He chose to keep descending for the reason I keep repeating. He didn't know his true position at all. Clipping trees should not happen if correctly guided, right

It's been said above, but ATC was only providing an advisory service. Nothing else. They already told Polish Air Force 101 that they couldn't accept them - and that they were cleared to 100m and no more. Certainly, they didn't have clearance to land, nor was ATC controlling them.

They removed the equipment and had it altered. You want proof? Read Julia Latiyan of the Moscow Times. She ran an article on it just one week after. She mentioned the removals.

The equipment was removed, sure. But that was after the base was decommissioned - not after the crash. Anyway, it's irrelevant what equipment there was at Smolensk-North - the transcript tells us what the ATC and crew were doing and using.

Yes, but they were guiding. Let me put it to you this way. You have a man paid to be the eyes of a blind man who needs to reach his final destination. You have the full picture and can see the danger ahead. You guide him into a hole from which he dies thereafter. Whose fault is it?

Unfortunately, in this case - ATC is advisory, not guiding. A PAR approach would be a different story - but in this case, when they were attempting a landing despite being told that they couldn't? It's no fault of the ATC if they attempted to land and got it wrong.

Check the cenogram, Delph. They gave info to the pilots which amazed the Polish side. They could only have had that with radars to support their case.

Where in the transcript do they show amazement, apart from after hitting the trees?

The Russians have different landing protocols, Delph. The truth is, when they were under 100 metres, they were falling more rapidly than they should have and they weren't told this by the tower.

The tower may not necessarily have known until it was too late. You can see how quickly the Horizon comment came - but in such conditions, you can hardly expect the ATC to be able to react that quickly. Radars just don't update that quickly!

Given the dips, they were 100 metres not from the ground but from the dip. The onboard metres read the wrong thing. The tower had an obligation to tell them.

They did. Horizon 101?

The onboard meters seem to have worked just fine - the confusion between the meters shows this clearly.

Look how inept the Russians have been, Delph. They took 2 months to discover the 3rd person in the cabin. The Poles found this out quickly after listening to the recordings.

Inept, or thorough? I'd rather have them take their time and get it done properly, rather than rush something out which would satisfy no-one.

The point is that they were a sufficient height above the lowest point of the dip but NOT from the ground, the area that Russian ground control was monitoring.

We know this. We also know that the Russian ATC didn't have the capability to judge height.
delphiandomine   
8 Jun 2010
News / Decoded talks inside Poland's president's plane are released in Internet [337]

Couldn't accept them? I don't follow.

They were told, clearly, that the conditions at Smolensk-North were unsuitable for landing.

They were leading them into areas known to accelerate the rate of descent and they didn't inform them of that.

Known to who, Seanus? The crew of the TU-154M were in Smolensk a few days before - why didn't they pick up on this then? I'm also wondering where you've obtained this from - it's not something being mentioned on any credible aviation forum.

Look at the decline speed and distance covered and you'll see that they don't check out with regular aircraft descent ratios.

That's simply answered - they should have been at 300m over the outer NDB, and instead were quite a bit higher. Thus - they needed a steeper angle of approach in order to correct it.

The critical point at 100m is where the distortion factor came in.

What distortion factor?

The TAWS system wasn't activated until around 10:39:41 as the wavering and dragging air pockets didn't allow for an accurate reading before that.

I'm fairly certain that there would be no need for it to kick in before then - what for? The TU-154M needs about 30-50m to go from descent to climb.

The instruments' calibration was offset by the 'jary' and to a material extent.

Nothing wrong with the calibration - the latest MAK report says that there was nothing wrong with the instruments. The Polish haven't disagreed, so no issue there.

He could have diverted, that's true. In fact, if you had read Polish transcripts, you would have seen the important utterance, 'odchodzimy' (the 2nd pilot, the co-pilot).

Sure. But instead, the captain chose to keep descending.

That clearly shows that they believed they were higher due to looking at the onboard instruments.

Actually - it means he was aware that they had gone below 100m without acquring a visual fix on the runway. It may also indicate that he was following the ATC request - go to 100m, if you can't see the runway, go around.

However, Russian ATC well knew that they were falling at 8m per s as opposed to the normal 3.5 m/s.

Really? The Russians have consistently stated that there was no PAR equipment installed at Smolensk-North. So - how did they fine well know, in the absence of such equipment? The fact that the crew didn't request a PAR approach also lends credence to this. They landed there a few days previously - so they would have known about the possibility of making a PAR approach, if the option existed.

It's very unlikely that the ATC knew - they may have had an idea, but there's nothing they could do - after all, they're not flying the plane.

They saw, on their radars, the real position and the pilots saw the distorted one after the 'jary' effect.

Seanus, that's frankly speaking nonsense. There's absolutely no evidence whatsoever to support this.

They kept telling them that all was ok, a blatant lie!

No, they didn't tell him that everything was ok. They told him what they could - that they were on course and on the glidescope. And - they were - up until they dropped below 100m. From the looks of things, they actually only screwed it up when they dropped below 100m.

he was dragged under by the pulling power which gave him a false reading of his true position.

Where's your source for this? I've never heard of air pockets causing not only a false reading on the barometric altimeter, but also the radar altimeter.

I think jary translates as 'air pockets'. They have a clear effect.

Sure, they do. But the pilot's actions in this case clearly shows that they didn't exist here.

The TAWS system works to varying degrees, depending on the terrain. They were in special terrain there and that altered its ultimate efficacy.

Or - simply put - the system installed simply didn't have the detailed maps for Smolensk-North. It had the basic TAWS system - which did the job fine.

Latest interesting development is that the Polish Air Force refused a Russian offer to add a Russian navigator to the crew, to faclilitate communications and operations.

Interestingly, until last year, when flying to a military airport in Russia, it was compulsory to have a Russian navigator on board.

Well, isn't it lucky that the necessary equipment possessed by the Russians conveniently went missing?

Actually - Smolensk-North has been all but decommissioned as an airfield. It is literally bare bones - one glidepath, little equipment (a basic radar, that seems to be about it) - and even the lights at the start of the runway were specially brought in for the purpose.

They had all the guidance tools but fiddled with things (the bulb issue).

The bulb issue was based one person's claim that they were from Smolensk. There was no evidence whatsoever to back this up - indeed, the Yak reported that they had formed a gate of light and that they saw it.

Polish navigation experts will show this when they get the next instalment from the black boxes.

I'm not holding my breath. But no doubt, the relevant box will show that the autopilot was consciously set to 8m/s.
delphiandomine   
8 Jun 2010
News / Decoded talks inside Poland's president's plane are released in Internet [337]

The pilot took heed of all instructions from ATC.

No he didn't. If he did, he wouldn't even started to begin the descent. As f stop says - he was clearly told that they couldn't accept them - but unfortunately, ATC is only advisory, not binding.

It shows how there was negligence in not navigating the plane properly from Ground Control and also how they said they were on the right course.

There was nothing faulty with the guidance given by ATC - they were cleared to 100m. Why did they go below 100m? There's no reason or excuse to do so - unless they were attempting a landing contrary to ATC guidance.

Also, in terms of course - the transcript shows that they passed over both the outer and inner NDB markers, so they were fine.

They said he didn't understand key procedures but he showed that he did.

Well, he attempted a landing after being told that Smolensk-North couldn't accept them. He also went below minimums for no apparent reason.

The decision to go to autopilot was particularly controversial. Looking for the runway? Why? Because they weren't helped and there wasn't even an ILS in place, never mind an MLS.

What was supposed to happen from an ATC perspective was that they were cleared down to 100m, they would have a look - and if the runway wasn't in sight, they would go around. There's debate over just what was installed in the TU-154M and whether it was compatible with what was available at Smolensk - but this is the Captain's responsibility to request the usage of landing aids, not ATC's.

As it stands - they were helped down to 100m by ATC. For some unknown reason, the Captain decided to go below that, while still on autopilot. Perhaps he didn't notice the callouts, perhaps he thought that he saw the runway - we don't know and will probably never know.

The Russians had enough data to guide them.

From a controller perspective, they didn't. That's why they were told that "conditions for acceptance : none" - because they couldn't get the plane on the ground safely. The Russians have also comprehensively denied that any precision radar equipment was installed at Smolensk-North - which is believable, given that they have all but emptied the airport of anything useful.

Also, they didn't inform the Polish crew of the cold and heavy air in the terrain dips. That increased the rate of decline and precipitated the demise.

Nothing that the TU-154M couldn't deal with. They simply failed to stop the descent at 100m for reasons known only to the pilot.

Also, read up on TAWS and how it works in foreign climes.

As far as I'm aware, there wasn't detailed topographic information available for Smolensk - so it worked, but only in a very crude manner.

Interestingly, it looks like they have the full GPS track of the plane according to a poster on PPRuNe - so this will crush a few conspiracies.
delphiandomine   
8 Jun 2010
Travel / Driving lights in Poland [25]

what are those?

Also known as low beam headlights - they're the ones that you use for ordinary driving in the evening in the city.
delphiandomine   
8 Jun 2010
Love / A Polish womans relationship with her mother in law. [44]

My son said 'Polish girls do not speak to their mother in law'

Not true in the slightest - in fact, it's normal for people to call their inlaws "mum" and "dad" after marriage.

Please tell me, are women in Poland kind a respectful to their mother in laws?

To their faces, usually. Behind their backs - well, that's a different story, but isn't it the same everywhere? ;)

My son was a nice clever lad until 14 when he secretly started cannabis.

Oh yes. Seen this in many people, it's tragic.
delphiandomine   
7 Jun 2010
Real Estate / Do any UK banks offer mortgages for Polish properties. [37]

Are they having a laugh ;(

PKO BP are pretty uncompetitive anyway - they're more of a dinosaur, reliable, but expensive.

What about trying Pekao instead? They might have a presence in the UK. I also recall that mBank have some sort of mortgage operation in London, but I could be wrong?
delphiandomine   
7 Jun 2010
Law / Bring your business to Poland! [56]

One of you mentioned social tax, could you please elaborate?

As a self employed person, you have a mandatory tax of 350PLN a month to pay in the first two years, then around 850PLN a month after that. It isn't applicable if the business is limited liability, however.

Otherwise, the employer contribution to social taxes is around 20% of gross salary - but it's quite normal for businesses to dodge paying social taxes by hiring people under "umowa o dzielo".

Also someone said that tax has to be paid even when company makes a loss. Isn’t tax in Poland paid on profits?

The social tax (ZUS) must be paid irrespective of profits for a self employed person. It's a bit of a bastard, but on the other hand - if your hotel only operates 6 months a year, then you can "hang up" the company during dead months and not pay a thing in social taxes.
delphiandomine   
7 Jun 2010
News / Decoded talks inside Poland's president's plane are released in Internet [337]

saying it pilot error only is not fair either

No, I think it's pretty obvious to outsiders (ie, outside the Air Force) that the captain isn't solely to blame - while he has to ultimately take responsibility for putting the plane into the ground, the cause is likely to lie deep within the Air Force.

I wonder why "MediaWatch" still hasn't discovered my little discrepancy, if he's so knowledgeable about this sort of thing?
delphiandomine   
7 Jun 2010
Travel / Driving lights in Poland [25]

There seems to be some confusion over the speed limit of 50 kmh or 60 kmh in built up areas, can anyone clear this up? I believe it has domething to do with time scales.

It's quite a nice law - and an utter contrast to the lunatic lights law :(
delphiandomine   
7 Jun 2010
Travel / Driving lights in Poland [25]

headlights on at all times whilst the vehicle is in motion.

Not headlights, but dipped headlights.

(one of the most idiotic things about Polish law, that one)