News /
Decoded talks inside Poland's president's plane are released in Internet [337]
How do you know about EACH of these people who you say have a "NO COMPROMISE WITH RUSSIA" attitude? Did you interview each of them?
Do you actually know anything about Polish politics?
Prawo i Sprawiedliwosc are fundamentally anti-communism and believe in complete lustration. These people are not interested in any sort of "compromise" with Russia - they see Russia clearly as the enemy. Whether they're right or wrong is irrelevant - the point is that PiS voters see Russia as the enemy. Given that all politics is sycophantic to a degree, and that Lech Kaczynski was well known to surround himself with yes-men (witness the complete destruction of public television!) - do you really need to interview every single person to know that his appointees were politically loyal and reliable? And the Kaczynski twins simply weren't interested in dialogue and communication with Russia.
Also Poles ARE speaking out against this investigation.
Really? Where are they, apart from in fringe media? I'm not reading anything in any credible newspaper or seeing anything on TV about it.
. 64% of Poles think something is suspicious about how their government is handling this investigation WITH Russia.
Source? That 64% figure reeks of "plucked out of thin air" - especially as I don't know anyone personally who thinks that there's a conspiracy. And - well - I actually live here.
I just told you about how Jaroslaw Kaczynski is speaking out against the Russian probe. Are you denying that he is?
I'm asking you to provide a source which is credible - ie, not a Russian State-controlled media source, but rather a Polish source. Remember, Jarek is no fan of Russia, and Russia doesn't particularly like him either - so it's in their interest to smear him on their websites.
Many Poles are supicious about this Russian explanation of "pilot error" as the WHOLE cause of everything.
Source? And please, not "Nasz Dziennik".
Authorities have so far failed to provide credible answers to the many unanswered questions that have emerged.
Why should they? The investigation is ongoing. Do we really need ANSWERS NOW, especially in the middle of a Presidential election campaign? I'm happy to wait to make sure that the answers are correct, rather than risking another screw up by the Polish government when it comes to false accusations.
"Authorities as well as the controlled mainstream media were quick to blame the crash on pilot error and fog.
Perhaps because the black boxes, opened and checked in the presence of the Polish authorities, confirmed this?
In addition, the rumor that Kaczynski had pressured the pilot to land and so caused the crash spread within hours in the mainstream media and was repeated without criticism even in some blogs belonging to the alternative media.
Do you have any evidence to suggest that he didn't? Kaczynski had history for doing it - so it's a fair assumption to make that he may have done it again.
But so many new facts and evidence have emerged CONTRADICTING government accounts that officials have been forced to retract statements.
It's called "new evidence is coming to light" - they're not forced to retract statements, they're simply updating people on what they know. For instance - after the 7/7 bombings, it was reported in the first hours as a series of power failures across the network. It only became apparent about 2 hours afterwards that it was actually terrorist attacks. Happens all the time with breaking news!
Doubts are also growing about the DNA analysis performed by labs in Russia to identify the victims, following a number of contradictory statements made by authorities."
Doubts are growing where, exactly?
“Forums and message board of Polish newspapers such as “Gazeta Wyborcza”, “Rzeczpospolita” and “Dziennik” indicate that the majority of Polish people, in the meantime, REJECT the official account of the plane crash due to pilot error.”
Oh, come on. Cranks inhabit intenet message boards, it's a widely observed phenomenon. Given that there's no way of prohibiting multiple accounts, it's very easy for a conspiracy theorist to simply register 10 names, all agreeing with each other.
Anyway, are you telling me that you trust random internet message boards over the highly trained professionals involved in the investigation? If so - it's time to remove the tin foil hat!
By the way -from your link.
Compelling new facts and evidence that the plane crash two weeks ago in Smolensk was engineered include the revelation that a device warning the pilot of obstacles was turned off.
Turned off? The transcripts say otherwise. Again - are they genuine, or are the Polish elite lying about the murder of their own democratically elected President?
Oh - and the source for that article? Source: KAvkaz Center. The same place that allegedly belongs to Chechen rebels - and is quite possibly operated by the FSB to discredit them. In short - not a credible source whatsoever.
You know, I admire the way that you keep trying to prove a conspiracy - but when your sources all lead back to the one highly uncredible Kavkaz Center - really, you need to try harder!
Now - when are you finally going to pick up on the discrepancy?
