PolishForums LIVE  /  Archives [3]    
   
Posts by Koala  

Joined: 4 May 2011 / Male ♂
Last Post: 19 Aug 2011
Threads: Total: 1 / In This Archive: 1
Posts: Total: 332 / In This Archive: 280

Displayed posts: 281 / page 3 of 10
sort: Latest first   Oldest first   |
Koala   
24 May 2011
History / Poland's biggest historical blunder? [341]

Koala, it does neither justify Gen. Zeligowski nor the Polish authorities who knew about that action, and the action was breaking international treaties. What had we got? Enmity of Lithuanians. Nowadays we have no Wilno, and do we suffer because of that?
Technically speaking, we should trade Wrocław for Lwów, too. Are you in? I'm not. Nowadays Wrocław is the purest Polish city.

What does this have to do with anything? Poland did note decide about post-WW2 borders, any trade was impossible. At the time there were very few Lithuanians in Wilno and surroundings. Lithuanians made alliance with a de facto criminal organization and aided them in war against Poland, they should have known it wouldn't go without consequences if Poland won the war.

Try to see it from the Lithuanian perspective. They are separate people who wanted their own land. The Russians helped them in that regard. Where else were they to go, the Soviet Union?

Koala, please don't insult my intelligence. I'm very aware of that fact but, with respect, you didn't answer my question. That's the second time you've sidestepped.

Intelligence is not the same as knowledge. You asked where else they should go to, but they went exactly to Soviet Union. The inhabitants of Wilno and the surroundings wanted to be a part of Poland, Lithuanians were the occupants after they entered the territory.
Koala   
24 May 2011
History / Poland's biggest historical blunder? [341]

Lithuanians comprised 5-7% of the total population fo the area. Poles 58%. There were more Belarusians and Jews in the region than Lithuanians. Also, after Polish-Russian war Poland offered to make a plebiscite, which Lithuania refused for obvious reasons.

Try to see it from the Lithuanian perspective. They are separate people who wanted their own land. The Russians helped them in that regard. Where else were they to go, the Soviet Union?

I'm not sure if you're serious. If you're not familiar with the subject, read a bit about it on wikipedia or something. Soviet Union = Russians = Bolsheviks (at the time at least)
Koala   
24 May 2011
History / Poland's biggest historical blunder? [341]

Lithuania entered the battlefield during Polish-Russian war and effectively aided Russians. The area was Polish before the Soviet invasion, Lithuania should have waited with negotiating with Bolsheviks until after the war with Poland was over. They happily claimed that territory, they shouldn't be surprised that we wanted it back.
Koala   
24 May 2011
History / Poland's biggest historical blunder? [341]

Big Polish historical blunders were: Invasion of Lithuania after WWI

I wouldn't call it a blunder, given the circumstances and ethnicity of the region itself.

(Harry, please don't even bother. I already know your stance on the matter)

Hmmm...that's why millions of Poles left for better shores?

Our energy is so explosive it can't be limited to our narrow borders LOL
Koala   
24 May 2011
Love / I need advice: divorce and my rights as a father in Poland [165]

It seems a bit weird to me that at first you're ready to go to Poland for sake of your family, then you're willing to file a divorce a couple of hours later. As others said, fight for her if you still love her, but do so by standing up to her.

In case you do file for a divorce, what are the chances of you getting primary parent rights (sorrym I don't know the proper English terminology - I mean that you live with your daughter, the mother meets with her occasionally)? Does the fact that you have reliable income helps with that in UK?
Koala   
24 May 2011
History / Poland's biggest historical blunder? [341]

Really! You were more "energetic"! In what way...car theft??? Some support for that statement, a statistic or something?

Simply the economic dynamics... You started off nicely in 1990, but quickly stagnated. Poland after dealing with the fact that Russian market collapsed picked up the steam and has been more dynamic ever since. That's as good measure of energy as any.

tradingeconomics.com/germany/percent-change-in-gdp-at-constant-prices-imf-data.html

tradingeconomics.com/poland/percent-change-in-gdp-at-constant-prices-imf-data.html

Well...PolsciDump and even Sokrates tell you otherwise...but you never pull anything off...from far above in lala-land! ;)

They're Germans in disguise.

...for that we have France! :(

The most cowardy nation in the world? Nice model to follow, LOL

I think this is a good place to insert some wisdom: "It is what it is."

The point of the discussion at hand is to stomp over each other, not to reach some universal wisdom! :P

OK, I'm heading off to work.
Koala   
24 May 2011
History / Poland's biggest historical blunder? [341]

Poland looked worse than the GDR in 1989, and that means something....fact!

We looked worse in terms of infrastructure, but we were more energetic and crime was actually smaller. I wonder why your eastern German bros means the GDR days though. It seems you can't organise daily life by yourselves, you need some overlords or the country is overrun by crazy nazis (why are there still nazis in Germany?).

That's why your country today is as big as Germany with not even the half of it's people...

But who caused that? You German genocidal barbarians. Our superior culture would never spring a thought of exterminating other nations, much less actually turning it into reality. Germany needs Poland if only to have a moral model to follow.

Give back what is now west Poland and we can talk about reparations...

Pay back for what you stole and destroyed (not those peanuts) and we might start talking about giving back western Poland.
Koala   
24 May 2011
History / Poland's biggest historical blunder? [341]

1) that GrzegorzK's post iss a load of crap.
2) Poland wasn't saved or rescued, unlike in Germany there was active and ongoing underground resistance against Russian occupation - case in point we were the first who got rid of it

3) we were bigger losers in that war than Germany, in terms of demographics, culture and infrastructure

And with what reason actually? You are really a twofaced people, b*itching about your "enemies" when nobody looks but openly bowing to either russian occupation or taking unashamedly german money and support as much as you can.

You never paid back for all the things you destroyed and stole during WW2. Handing money now is the only right thing to do.
Koala   
24 May 2011
History / Poland's biggest historical blunder? [341]

ROFL
You would still look like Ukraine without Germany!

You keep saying that, but we never looked like Ukraine.
edit: and what would Germany be without the Marshall plan?

Well, we fighted them and their victory cost them dearly...what did the Poles do again? Licking boots and saying "thank you" for 40 years ?

LOL wut? Poland became independent from Russians before DDR. In fact, DDR would still be under actual Russian occupation if not for the fall of communism triggered by Poles. Meanwhile Germany was peacefully and happily enjoying being ruled by a foreign country.
Koala   
24 May 2011
History / Poland's biggest historical blunder? [341]

Germany could have you left out to dry after the iron curtain fell but they lobbied for Poland to join the EU...did you ever wonder why?
Poland get's Billions of EU-funds...Germany invest heavily in Poland...1/3 of your whole trade is with Germany...did you ever wonder why?

Germany doesn't invest that heavily though. We're getting like €70B over a 7 year period, which is peanuts and a tiny percentage of our GDP. It's nice that we're getting those money, but it's not crucial. Meanwhile, western Germany pumped into eastern Germany hundreds of billion € after 1990 and look where it led to - to Ostalgia LOL. You Germans surely liked your Russian overlords.
Koala   
24 May 2011
Language / The usage and future of the special Polish letters: ą, ć, ę, ł, ń, ó, ś, ż, ź (Polish language) [203]

An atom's characteristics will not be identical either, even if the temperature is constant and the electromagnetic spectrum is identical.

Nothing in nature remains the same and there are always ongoing processes (even in vacuum with no real, material particles), but the general characteristics of an atom never change. Discussing atoms internal characteristics makes sense only when they're experimentally distinguishable.

I used both terms in the post you try to prove wrong.
If it's good for astronomers from California Institute of Technology it should be good for you and me.

Who wrote and edited that text?

Anyway, it's incorrect. You have a picture right there explaining what happens. City light does not interfere with starlight. If you want to, I can explain both claim in greater detail. The use of interference in that sentence is unfortunate, the word noise (szum) would probably be better.

You OTOH put the word interference in brackets as if the physical phenomenom would explain why you see fewer or no stars in urban environments, which is flat out wrong.

. This dialog started with a person with very limited experience, Lyzko, who pronounced a Polish word perfectly well (in regards to /g/), and as predicted by the rules of Polish phonology.

Which is fine and I already conceded that the sound in także might as well be /g/. You were wrong on the particular matter of comparing speech sounds recognition with the way our senses work.

But I guess they might ask you why.

I believe efficient work with various databases would be useful pretty much anywhere. I'm sure if I knew specifics of one's I could point out how it'd be useful.

And for the sake of God, affect.
Koala   
23 May 2011
Language / Polish Conditional - if you would.. [24]

I have a question regarding polish conditional. How do I say: "If you would come (to some place), we would..."

Isn't the correct English sentence "if you came, we would..."?

Anyway, there are a couple of ways to say that sentence:
"Gdybyś przyszedł, (po)opalalibyśmy się."
"Gdybyś przyszedł, byśmy się (po)opalali."
"Jeśli byś przyszedł, (po)opalalibyśmy się."
"Jeśli byś przyszedł, byśmy się (po)opalali."

I hope you know Polish good enough to analyza the sentences' structure and figure out a more general rule of creating such conditionals.
Koala   
23 May 2011
Language / The usage and future of the special Polish letters: ą, ć, ę, ł, ń, ó, ś, ż, ź (Polish language) [203]

If there is anything arbitrary here this is your statements about linguistics.

I'm not sure you understand what "arbitrary" means. Even if you have numerical data, in order to classify it you still need some arbitrary criteria. Electromagnetic spectrum of a particular atom is always the same (in the same temperature), the /g/ sound is never the same, even if pronounced by the same person. Stating that Venus is Venus is not arbitrary though, as it's one unique object that remains fairly unchanged.

And yes, computer software has to make such arbitrary decisions, how much the registered sound differs from the database ideal sample and choose the closest one, then group them into words and so on. Is there even 100% (or 99%) reliable voice recognition software?

True, it was Anetk. You only chose not to comment on his obvious mistake.

You had already done so.

You never claimed to /g/ either so either way, for all practical purposes you were ejecting the log establish facts that have been researched by linguists for centuries and confirmed by the more modern tools of the trade.

I'm not rejecting "long established facts", I'm questioning one statement for which I haven't seen empirical proof.

It'd be nice if you first read my post more carefully before making this comment.

Yes, I did. You said that you can't see Venus because of interference which is an incorrect statement.

Since you still insist on the use of "arbitrary" when it comes to linguistics, and since yours are clearly statements stemming from your (also self admitted) ignorance in this area of study, the above doesn't need addressing anymore.

You know that I was right and you don't want to admit it. Recognizing/discerning individual sounds in a language is a matter of experience, hearing them is not. Seeing stars is not a matter of experience (knowledge), knowing what they are is. The fact that inhabitants of big cities do not see stars is not a matter of experience!

First, I made no statements about our sister's curriculum.

So you're my long lost brother! :D

Etnolinguistics is just a field of linguistics the fact that someone who studied it had to take few to no math courses proves nothing.

It proves that math courses aren't standard in linguistics.
Koala   
23 May 2011
History / Poland's biggest historical blunder? [341]

Rampant speculation is rampant. Six CIA flights passed through Szymany, the rest about is pure speculation, nothing is documented or was ever even reported by the local people about suspicious places that could serve as a detention center. And believe me, people in small towns know everything about everything.
Koala   
23 May 2011
Love / I need advice: divorce and my rights as a father in Poland [165]

Firstly I am not having a go at Polish woman or labelling them in any way, the reality is that I do have a Polish with :-) that appears to have become a bit dodgy.

It sound like a classic case of Madame Bovary. You have to do something about your situation, but I'm not sure bending to her will will improve things for your family. Maybe you should force her to get a job?
Koala   
23 May 2011
History / Poland's biggest historical blunder? [341]

the operation of an illegal detention centre

What????

that Poland has never run concentration camps

Poland ran a concentration camp... for Polish nationalists mostly. It's still sad and a clear case of breaking human rights, but it's not comparable to the camps organized by our direct (Germany, Russia, Ukraine) or less direct (Balkans) neighbours.
Koala   
22 May 2011
News / Ustroń: Another giant religious statue in Poland [26]

Świebodzin is my hometown and I'd like to add that the Christ's monument is entirely one man's initiative - a local priest here is kind of megalomaniac, he bought the ground and gathered all the funds. And honestly, no one cares about the old Church buildings and others structures, what's the big deal with the new ones? They'll become standard elements of landscape soon enough.

(BTW I'm not a catholic)
Koala   
21 May 2011
Language / The usage and future of the special Polish letters: ą, ć, ę, ł, ń, ó, ś, ż, ź (Polish language) [203]

"Eye kant reed inglish tu wel."

Would the equivalent of the above disconnect between sound and script be possible in any language OTHER than Mod. En.??

Ńe moge trzytadź po polskó zbyd dopsze.
That's as far as one could go trying to misspell the sentence "Nie mogę czytać po polsku zbyt dobrze" (but would be misspelled and badly pronounced).

. Is it because they are loser? Brighter?

You argumentation here is very shady. Venus has its unique diameter, mass, spectral lines and their intensities that made this planet uniquely Venus. Classification of sounds in languages is by default a lot more arbitrary, given the criteria that are assumed. Our discussion wasn't "does Venus exist", but "is Pluto a planet" (is the sound in 'także' a 'g'?), which is arbitrary as some consider it a planet, some don't.

That caused a blow back effect, as it turns out living in Poland doesn't ensure someone knows it all about the Polish language.

I did none of those things.

That you hear /k/

I never claimed to hear /k/

An example a little closer to linguistics, and specifically within the sphere of psycholinguistics, is one where a few words are misspelled, such as:

Cna yuo raed tihs?

I can, but it takes significantly longer to read such text. I can also read all you wrote below and it also takes significantly longer.

Which leads us to a little factual trivia.

It'd be nice to understand light interference before mentioning it as an example.

I heard about thousands of people who were reporting strange, lit objects on the sky.

Our senses work on a logarithmic scale, ie. the background noise is the base of the logarithm, we don't notice anything below its intensity. It's not the experience that makes you not see star light (or similar noise), it's your brain that physiologically shuts off signals to keep you sane (ignoring also the fact that your eyes' lenses change diameters in various light conditions).

Meanwhile, trying to analyze "także", there's nothing that was automatically shut off - in an arbitrarty classification I considered it a different sound, apparently in established classifications it's the same sound.

Mathematics, logic and statistical analysis is in fact of curriculum in some linguistics departments.

"Some" being the key word. My sister studied etnolinguistics and had only one semester of logic (if we classify it as part of mathematics and not the reverse), which is laughable!
Koala   
21 May 2011
Language / The usage and future of the special Polish letters: ą, ć, ę, ł, ń, ó, ś, ż, ź (Polish language) [203]

You mean "no more phonetic", don't you? :)
There's no 1 to 1 correspondence between phonemes and graphemes, but if a native language speaker sees a Polish word for the first time, he'll pronounce it correctly, something that's impossible in English. If a native Polish speaker hears a word for the first time, he might spell it incorrectly (ignoring u/ó, ch/h, rz/ż).
Koala   
21 May 2011
Language / The differences between these words: Oni plywaja / plyna / biegaja /biegna /chodza /ida [18]

Lyzko, I don't think it's as clear cut as you seem to indicate. Let's take your example with the opera:
"Wczorajsza opera podobała mi się" means "I liked the opera yesterday", while "Wczorajsza opera spodobała mi się" indicates that you liked the opera but you probably hadn't expected to like it, therefore your state of mind was changed during the opera. I'd say tryb dokonany (perfective?) usually describes change of state of something (of the subject or the object or the implied object), tryb niedokonany (imperfective?) describes activity.

However, the distinction between tryb dokonany/niedokonany are only in past and future tenses, there's no such distinction in present tense (as it wouldn't make logical sense). In polish many activities are described by a set of two separate verbs, one that describes the action happening at the moment, the other describes the action occurring regularly (kind of like differences between present continuous and present simple in English).
Koala   
21 May 2011
Language / The usage and future of the special Polish letters: ą, ć, ę, ł, ń, ó, ś, ż, ź (Polish language) [203]

I asked for an articulate post and when I finally got one, I didn't respond immediately. Sorry about that, I actually did write one before but Firefox crashed and didn't feel like write it down all over again. Since you great post deserve at least some appreciation, I'm writing it down again.

I'll have to give in and say that if phonetics experts say that's the same sound, I'll have to rely on it. But that's one big problems for me in general - it describes qualitatively, not quantitatively, which makes everything rely on blurry statements and authority, not on empirical data like normal exact science.

That's understandable, although I'd say it would take an average learner no more than a couple of weeks to study it and achieve a near expert understanding of what these signs mean and how they are to be used, along with some associated, practical examples. Not a rocket science at all.

I know what many of those symbols correspond to (it was useful learning French), I don't know what the terms like "velar" or "pharyngelar" mean. And I certainly don't a have a couple of weeks of time to learn it LOL.

He may be satisfying this requirement in his field of expertise, but Polish phonology is not that field.

It's not hard to admit defeat as there's no battle in the first place, unless you treat a discussion as such, which tells more about you than anything else. Another thing I don't understand is why linguistics don't have several semesters of mathematics. It'd make much sense in that even a book like "A Hundred Years of Solitude" could be analyzed quantitatively (statistically) if you knew what data could be useful for your goals and how to extract it.
Koala   
21 May 2011
Off-Topic / How do Polish people operate? what makes them tick? [103]

*looks at message boards all over the world*
No, that's just a common human trait.

My biggest problem with Poles is the work ethics. Not that we don't work hard, but we often don't put our hearts into it and want to get things done quickly, not right, which often results in having to redo the same work again.
Koala   
20 May 2011
Po polsku / Oda do Marysi [54]

Bo Polska jest szufladą pełną dzienciolow, i jak wam the denko odpadnie od stukania za dużo to wszyscy na pysk spadniecie.

Nie chcę wypominać, którego narodu rzetelność i niepazerność doprowadziła świat do światowego kryzysu gospodarczego, a który cwaniacki i leniwy naród przez ten kryzys przeszedł co najwyżej z lekką zadyszką.
Koala   
20 May 2011
Love / Goal: Meet a nice Polish girl! [60]

Is this true?How are these strange preferences explained?I mean in a sea of decent white men going for the colored disadvantaged?

There are so few foreigners in Poland being non-caucasian is actually a big advantage. It's rare and exotic, therefore attractive for girls here.
Koala   
20 May 2011
Po polsku / Oda do Marysi [54]

Mysle ze ludzie wiedza dlaczego. Nie warto juz na ten temat dyskutowac.

No właśnie nie wiem dlaczego.

W dodatku:

Po prostu ciężko mi być życzliwym dla ludzi którzy łatwe życie mieli

Jak mamy łatwe życie, po co je zmieniać?