PolishForums LIVE  /  Archives [3]    
   
Posts by delphiandomine  

Joined: 25 Nov 2008 / Male ♂
Warnings: 1 - Q
Last Post: 17 Feb 2021
Threads: Total: 86 / In This Archive: 69
Posts: Total: 17813 / In This Archive: 12419
From: Poznań, Poland
Speaks Polish?: Yeah.
Interests: law, business

Displayed posts: 12488 / page 254 of 417
sort: Latest first   Oldest first   |
delphiandomine   
5 Feb 2012
History / Would you classify the Poland's Communist years as a "Soviet occupation" ? [221]

Fight back and you're a terrorist do nothing and you give legitimacy to the state, so says the law?

I only look at it from the point of view that I'd rather have iron-fisted Russians running Chechyna than a bunch of dodgy Islamists who would quickly turn the state into...well, it isn't worth thinking about.

Are you saying that the Polish army elite knew all the time that the Soviets were responsible for the crime, but went along with the lie that the Nazis did it for political reasons?

I thought that was the accepted version of things?

Well, then you have quite unusual views on these matters...

If "unusual" is "doing what's best for yourself and your family" - then...

Sure commies in Poland had some autonomy, therefore I don't buy stuff such as "Jaruzelski had no choice", however strategical issues such as membership in Warsaw Pact, red ideology etc. were undisputed.

That's why I say it wasn't a puppet state, but rather a tinpot regime.

With Jaruzelski, it's my personal view that he may not have trusted the Soviets at all - he was installed as their man (arguably, ever since 1945, he was Moscow's man - his rapid career rise despite his dubious background confirms this) as First Secretary - and from what we know, it may be that he felt that he had to introduce martial law. We simply don't know what was going on inside his head at that point. Civil war was becoming a possibility (remember - plenty of people owed their position to the PRL) - and given the Soviet history (including endless lies about intentions) - he may have felt that martial law was a way of keeping them out of Poland.

It's a great shame that the Moscow archives won't be opened - we could learn so much about what was going on then.
delphiandomine   
5 Feb 2012
History / Would you classify the Poland's Communist years as a "Soviet occupation" ? [221]

So you never heard of puppet governments?? Don't tell me a guy like you who is interested in history never heard of puppet governments??

It wasn't a puppet government. If it was, Gomułka would never have stood up to Moscow, Kania would never have refused to "sort things out" and so on. It was Communist and in the Warsaw Pact - but not a puppet government.

The Communist Poles who oppressed other Poles, were simply puppets of Moscow.

This was true up until 1956 - but after that, they were actively encouraging the Soviet presence in Poland.

There is a difference - the Communists put loyalists in charge, whereas with the Nazi model - they had Germans in place to make sure that their will was followed. This wasn't the case after 1956 in Poland - there are enough examples where Poland followed a different path to the Soviet Union. It was a tinpot regime, but not a puppet regime. Generally speaking - Poles dealt with Polish affairs within the constraints of the system.

Moscow is now doing this today in Chechnya. It has empowered select ethnic Chechens acting as a puppet government to control all the other Chechens.

Do you honestly prefer Islamist Chechen terrorists over Russian Christian rule? In Poland - you'll find people are actually more pro-Russia in this case.

Indeed the Soviet Union would have had a hell of a problem on its hands if all of the Polish ruling class rebelled against Moscow. But the Polish ruling class pretty much had fresh memories of what the Soviets did to Poles who were "a hell of a problem" and against Moscow. Its called KATYN.

For once, a fair assessment. Katyn would certainly have played on the minds of the Polish Army elite, not least Jaruzelski. But - to be fair - they weren't a problem. Poland was thoroughly defeated in 1939 - Katyn was simply a way of making sure that the elite of the Polish Army couldn't come back to haunt them.

But yes, if the PZPR elite had turned on Moscow (especially Gomułka or Jaruzelski) - then we could've seen a hell of a fight. I actually would (in 1980) rate Poland's chances of winning as being quite high - defensively, Poland would have had the Oder/Bug and the mountains on their side.

If you were them, WHAT would you choose??

I don't criticise anyone for the decisions they made during that time. I don't think people can be blamed for wanting a better life for themselves and their families, and I have no issue with people doing what they could. It might not have been "honourable" - but it was certainly pragmatic.
delphiandomine   
5 Feb 2012
History / Would you classify the Poland's Communist years as a "Soviet occupation" ? [221]

Without a doubt. One thing to bear in mind that in Hungary 1956 and Czechoslovakia 1968 - there were a willing cadre of Party members who were happy to stab their comrades in the back to retain power. If all the comrades had turned round and said ***** you" (or a First Secretary who commanded immense personal loyalty, like Tito) - the Soviet Union would have had a hell of a problem on their hands.

So why are you defending matrial law so much ?

Hard to see what else could have been done - Jaruzelski was in a tough spot, and couldn't have been sure of their intentions despite saying that they had no interest in helping - they did the same thing previously to Czechoslovakia.
delphiandomine   
5 Feb 2012
History / Would you classify the Poland's Communist years as a "Soviet occupation" ? [221]

Another masterstroke by the Communists - make people believe that Moscow was the one oppressing them, when it was the Government of the PRL all along. The truth was only revealed in December 1981 - and the way that the system fell apart quickly after that tells you a lot.

When you see how utterly brainwashed the people were by the Communists - it's frightening. To this day - many myths which exist as a result of brainwashing ("recovered territories", "western betrayal" and so on) are still passed down from generation to generation.

Total nonsense. If there hadn't been enough of such Poles, the Russians would have been sent to do the job, actually It was partly implemented in 1944-56. If anything else had failed, Poland would have been made one more Soviet republic.

It doesn't change anything - Poles oppressed Poles after 1956, not the Soviets.

As much as you cling to hypothetical situations and so on - the basic facts are that Poles were doing the dirty work, not Soviets or anyone else.

Also worth pointing out that the Soviets had little appetite for doing much in 1981.
delphiandomine   
5 Feb 2012
History / Why are Jews pestering Poland for "proper" WW2 monetary restitution/reparations? [750]

If Poland agrees to pay the reparation to the Jews that can proof they or their family own property, what price is fair the 1939 -1945 value or 2012 value ?

The 2012 value. It's in line with precedent - the RCC has been robbing Poland blind of the 2012 values (and much more) - so why not everyone else?

Let me ask this from the Jewish contingent on PF.

What Jewish contingent?

1. Reclaiming their stolen property is not a robbery. Unlike individual Jews, CC is an institution with continuity.

Obtaining tens of millions for individual properties as well as the return of the properties is daylight robbery. You're not here - you're not the one who sees his tax money going to subsidise fat wealthy priests and their opulent lifestyles rather than poor children/homeless/etc.

WE? You, British sponger, paid not even penny. It's just silly how you pretend you have a dog in this race.

When was the last time you paid tax in Poland? I pay every single month - and a good bit of it, too. You - on the other hand - only contribute to Canadian excise taxes.

Hopefully innocent Polish taxpayers will not have to pay a dime for this and the restitution money comes from Berlin and Moscow who were the ones who created this situation.

Moscow and Berlin didn't pay for the RCC's thefts, so why should they pay now?
delphiandomine   
5 Feb 2012
History / Why are Jews pestering Poland for "proper" WW2 monetary restitution/reparations? [750]

You do realise that in Poland, the RCC has already thoroughly robbed Poland blind?

Hopefully innocent Polish taxpayers will not have to pay a dime for this and the restitution money comes from Berlin and Moscow who were the ones who created this situation.

Alas, precedent is such that we've already paid out billions to the RCC.
delphiandomine   
5 Feb 2012
Law / Is there a legal requirement for us to support aging parents in Poland? [26]

If he was a non-supportive parent, not present in your life, then the court will probably laugh at him.

Would you honestly trust the Polish court to actually make the right decision?

The usual way - they issue a warrant which means the OP would be arrested should they return.

Worth pointing out that it would also be enforceable through the SIS - Schengen Information System. So they'd be at risk of arrest when crossing any Schengen frontier, not just the Polish one.
delphiandomine   
5 Feb 2012
History / Would you classify the Poland's Communist years as a "Soviet occupation" ? [221]

If you talk to people who were in the opposition, you will get diffrent answer.

Of course, much of the "opposition" had family members in prominent positions. And let's not forget that many people were members of the Party through their jobs - not many people refused good work on the grounds of mandatory Party membership.

Plus schools, hospitals, all the stuff they hadn't been good at before or since when profit reared it's ugly head.

Education is the big one for me - the difference between the II RP and the PRL when it came to providing education to all was massive.

Those who were in the apparatus of repression are deeply despised in Poland.

Except they're not. Jaroslaw Kaczynski is a fine example - a man who undoubtably benefited from having a father in a good position in the PZPR, a product of a turncoat traitor - and yet the man still wins 30% of the vote.

So many Poles benefited from the system (even if they weren't Party members themselves) that such hatred is completely artificial.

(and much of the hatred stems from jealousy as opposed to being for ideological reasons)
delphiandomine   
4 Feb 2012
History / Why are Jews pestering Poland for "proper" WW2 monetary restitution/reparations? [750]

Just like every single Russian Jew was Russian and considered by Russians to be good Russians?

Three mentions of Russians in a thread that has absolutely nothing to do with Russia. Obsessed.

Delph give me your address and phone number and I'll meet you on July 2nd.

Maybe you and I can have some drinks and have a little chit chat on some things.

Excellent - I'll pass you the details of the programme director in the USA. She'll tell you all you need to know - just tell her you'd like to be sent to Poznan.

I'm sure you'll be delighted to teach poor Polish nursery children.

Not sure what you mean by that, but I do defend against anti-Polish lies and slander on the internet.

You mean you push a dodgy right wing agenda down people's throats.

As I've said countless times - Poland doesn't need defended by Americans.
delphiandomine   
4 Feb 2012
History / Would you classify the Poland's Communist years as a "Soviet occupation" ? [221]

Yugoslavia wasn't in the Warsaw pact...

It was certainly a member of Cominform.

Directly or indirectly did it matter? The Soviets occupied Polish lands either you like it that way or not so it is proper to call the Communist years as Soviet occupation!

It is not proper at all - in fact, it's historical revisionism to suggest so. Sovereignty tends to rest upon recognition - and the PRL was internationally recognised.

Had they worked hard and seen that as number one priority in their life then they would eventually get it! But there was very few tries at best! Having the commies almost force people to move...

Again - Western propoganda. The Communist system generally did quite a good job of getting people into liveable accommodation - the huge building projects in the 50's all the way through to the 80's are testament to that. There was never much in the way of horrible communal apartments, unlike in the USSR for instance.

Yes and their opposition was not wished for

What has that got to do with anything?

He doesn't even deserve his own last name his family denounced him if I remember correctly.

You can't change the fact that it was a guy from a patriotic Polish Catholic family of noble origins who dealt a decisive blow to Poles at that time.

By whom?

Open the history books and you'll see it in black and white - he was regarded as being one of the better Communists - and was seen as someone who was able to do what was best for Poland. Never wondered why martial law was such a shock? Nothing to do with the repression - but everything to do with who was repressing.

Maybe in finding government jobs, but not in making your life better...

That's why lots of peasants fled just before/after the founding of the II RP, right? The II RP was a dreadful country in terms of social mobility - don't even try and pretend otherwise.

Your problem is that you think of them in a ethnocentric way... What language they spoke or what tradition they had around the table or what kind of food they made didn't give a damn to people like my family! They were traitors to Poland! They lost their nationality and any mingling with them was downgraded to an absolute minimum.

Ah, it's so easy to say that now. They were Polish and Poles, no matter how hard you try to claim otherwise. If they weren't - how could they be traitors?

Do you really think an Irish would call any of the soldiers that shot at them in their attempts for independence: Irish? No matter that he was born in Dublin and moved to London or had a strong Irish accent? They would call him a Brit. And rightly so!
Just like that I call all those traitors commies! Their a different nationality for me which doesn't count for anything.

Actually - they do call them Irish. They may add all sorts of words before/after the word, but they're still Irish. You can't try and change history by making them to be something that they aren't.

Even the fact that it indeed participated in the invasion of Czechoslovakia points in that direction.

You do realise that there was considerable bad blood between Czechoslovakia and Poland for years?

Just like the Soviet Union halting them from intervening in Poland.

They took part in the Soyuz 80 moves, so to suggest that the Soviet Union gave a damn about Polish sensitivities in this area is amusing.

No matter what you say - no matter how much you claim to be some proud patriotic family - the fact remains that Poles enslaved Poles.

Well if the Polish army went along with the Soviets, it appears it did so to stay in the good graces of the Soviets.

I suggest you look at Polish-Czechoslovak relations. They were quite poor - 1920, 1938, 1968 and even 1980 all point at why. It had nothing to do with "good graces" and everything to do with the fact that the Poles quite wanted to give them another bloody nose. Don't forget that Poland in 1968 would still have quite liked to take some territory back.

Unless I am unaware that the "Polish" generals and military leaders were hungering for an invasion of Czechoslovakia and did what ever in their power to convince their political leaders?

They wouldn't have needed convincing - there was enough bad blood there.
delphiandomine   
4 Feb 2012
History / Why are Jews pestering Poland for "proper" WW2 monetary restitution/reparations? [750]

Really? Every single one of them? LOL

The clue is in the name "Polish". And yes, every single one of them.

But if I was a citizen of Poland and I had a problem with the Polish government, I certainly would not disrespect the Polish government and Polish people by having foreign political entities intervene on my behalf against the Polish goverment, like Polish Jews are.

Unbelievably racist accusation, that. It's the same old tired nonsense that was trotted out in the 1930's and late 1960's - we've heard it all before, and funnily enough, it tends to be spouted by those who have some sort of racial agenda.

Then again MediaWatch, if you care about so much about Poland, why not hop on a plane and make a difference? I need some American volunteers in Summer - between July 2nd to July 27th. What about it? I'll even sort you out with accommodation and meals.

Oh, I forget...you're an internet "defender".
delphiandomine   
4 Feb 2012
History / Would you classify the Poland's Communist years as a "Soviet occupation" ? [221]

Stalin tried to assassinate Tito several time and about Albania no clue, maybe cause it was unimportant?

Tito swiftly told Stalin where to go though. If you consider that Stalinism was the worst - and they couldn't finish off Tito - it shows how Moscow wasn't anywhere near as dominant as the Western media pretended. As for Albania - it certainly was important in its own way.

Again it's not Poland and not earlier educated commies that seized the power in Poland thanks to the red army or can you tell me something otherwise

The point is that the Soviet Union simply didn't have as much of an iron grip over Poland as Americans seem to think. It's even known nowadays that the Soviet Union was anticipating the loss of Poland in the early 80's.

It confirms that the puppets in PRL were more obidiant then other eastern block countries like Romania.

Or perhaps it confirms that they were simply happy with their lot. Don't forget that Communism did bring in some positive changes too - we saw the introduction of universal free education for the first time in a Polish state, for instance. It's easy for us from the West to not understand - but Poland changed dramatically - and many former peasants were very happy with the idea of guaranteed work, guaranteed flat and so on.

Reason behind that was that the biggest portion of any kind of support the commies could get was from farmers, and to NOT disturb their "support" was of course to not take their land

Actually - it's more that they encountered massive opposition to the plans. Again - another example where Poland didn't toe the line.

well surprise surprise the army that was doing what they were told to do, were conscripts from the Polish population! There were plenty obstacles for any commie officer who didn't think about that.

Doesn't change the fact that it was a Polish general who ordered the crackdown on Poles. I don't remember the exact number, but the army was a generally trusted institution prior to December 1981 - Jaruzelski himself was actually quite popular - and it was believed that the army would never be used against Poles themselves.

There wasn't a will to do except thinking about their land!

The peasants moved into the cities. The elite was destroyed in WW2 - and former peasants suddenly found themselves thrust into power.

If there was any law restraining peasants or any class in Poland from gaining wealth please enlighten me.

The social barriers in the II RP were tremendous - again - one thing that Communism offered was a way for people from poor backgrounds to become elite in the country. Same in most Communist countries, in fact.

Hah laughable, if anything those "Poles" were not Poles. Either crooks or sellouts and commies. But not Poles that's for sure. Just like calling Quisling a Norwegian very laughable indeed.

Unfortunately, they were as Polish as they came. The elite were often made up of people who came from generations of villagers - people who were as Polish as they come. And don't forget the ultimate example - Jaruzelski, born into a family of Polish Catholic patriots. Heck - what about Jaroslaw Kaczynski's father - former AK turned PZPR.

People try and deny it nowadays, but there's absolutely no escaping the fact that Communism couldn't have survived for so long without the collaboration of a vast amount of Poles. I'm not passing judgement - but it couldn't have happened without them.
delphiandomine   
4 Feb 2012
History / Would you classify the Poland's Communist years as a "Soviet occupation" ? [221]

No, you and a couple other British expatriates have claimed this but the Polish, Polonian, and Irish members of this forum have shown that your claims are all wet. Why should it surprise anyone that forum members from a country with a bloody history of imperialism would be wrong about this?

Actually, we go by history. And history shows that the PRL was internationally recognised and a fully accepted member of the United Nations. It most certainly was not "occupied".

they would be very offended indeed if you suggested they were collaborating with a foreign occupier.

Indeed. Do we need to mention that martial law was an operation carried out by the Polish Army against Poles?

Worth mentioning that all these points have been made and it was established that the PRL, while hardly a paragon of liberal democracy, was not an occupation.

Indeed, it was the recognised Polish state. The "Government-in-exile" enjoyed little to no international recognition.

Spoken like the troll that you are, JohnnyM. It was an occupation. You are wrong

Mods?

the state PRL had to do all what Moscow said,

That's not actually true. If you look at the Soviet Bloc - we have the first example of Tito more or less telling Moscow to get ******, the second example of Albania following China and not Moscow, and the third example of Romania perusing somewhat of an independent line (and winning favour with the West). All of these somewhat confirm that Moscow's rule wasn't anywhere near as total as is assumed. The different interpretations of socialism in each country also shows this - Poland never went in for collective farming in a big way, for instance.

which most of the Polish public thought was the right thing to do for those in charge since they would most likely get demoted, killed or in any way harmed.

Killing and harming didn't happen very much after Stalinism. Marital law was actually exceptional for how restrained it really was - to this day, I can't figure out why the leading figures behind Solidarity weren't murdered.

Of course if it was their choice and there was no barriers they would like to have an free and democratic Poland without any commie joke as their government.

There were plenty of people who had no interest in this - because they were better off under the PRL than before. Many peasants became people of power in the PRL - do you think they would have had power under the elitist II RP?

In no legal sense it was thought of as occupation, but the people living in Poland felt they were occupied. No matter the political system there were red army soldiers there with red army tanks who were the only reason why the governments of PRL were tolerated.

Did you forget who was part of WRON already? Poland after Poznan 56 was more than capable of dealing with problems herself.

1. Foreign force in an foreign country under the PRETEXT of defending it doesn't mean it isn't occupying it.

If anything, Poles were occupying Poland after Stalinism came to an end.
delphiandomine   
4 Feb 2012
News / Poland now soft-pedalling ACTA signing [107]

What's comical is that much of the anti-ACTA protests (especially in Poznan) were led by PiS supporters.

Nice of you to admit that they are all "cheapies who have no regard" - we all knew that already.
delphiandomine   
4 Feb 2012
History / Would you classify the Poland's Communist years as a "Soviet occupation" ? [221]

The guy with the biggest gun wins.

Or - as was often the case, especially in the 60's/70's - it was whoever bribed the Government with the most cash. It went to ridiculous levels when you had the USA and the Soviet Union both showering small insignificant countries with cash, just to get them to go along with their "system" and not the other.

When MediaWatch rants about no-one recognising the PRL, he forgets that there were plenty of Soviet-aligned countries who weren't controlled by anyone - especially the Arab and African countries.
delphiandomine   
4 Feb 2012
Off-Topic / Book: Gogol's Taras Bulba [37]

The Ukraine

Wrong. It's "Ukraine", not "The Ukraine". "The Ukraine" is an offensive, outdated term with colonial implications.
delphiandomine   
3 Feb 2012
Law / Driving in Poland on a foreign license [45]

Not true. An EU licence is valid until expiry in any other EU state.

In regards to any traffic infractions or violations commited in one country, that infraction or violation will be only registered in police database in that country where violation was issued.

Wrong. FR, DE and CH already exchange driver information.

Someone just had a violation in one country and is travelling in another EU country and a driver end up being pulled over let's say for routine traffic check then a driver's infracions or violations will not show on the local Police database in the country in which driver was pulled over and record was checked..

Wrong. As I said above - FR/DE/CH already deal with driving offences together.
delphiandomine   
3 Feb 2012
History / Would you classify the Poland's Communist years as a "Soviet occupation" ? [221]

Nobody here claiming that Moscow did not control these countries will answer the simple question. Could the governments of these countries do things that Moscow didn't like?

I refer you to Tito's Yugoslavia, Hoxha's Albania and Ceausescu's Romania. All of them frequently did what they wanted to do and didn't toe the party line. Both Yugoslavia and Albania very much did their own thing - and Romania was also rather independently minded at times.

Why wasn't East Germany allowed to unite with West Germany before 1989? I'm sure the people of both those countries wanted to unite from 1950-1989.

You do realise that the French and British didn't particularly want German unification? If you knew your history (which you don't) - you'd know that the price of German unification was the Euro.

Most Poles don't come to this website since they see its just a bash Poland website for trolls like you. They are also mostly on Polish language websites anyway.

They don't come to this website because the majority of Poles don't see "the enemy within", they don't subscribe to ridiculous Smolensk theories and certainly have nothing to do with racist Polish-Americans who insist that they know better than Polish people.

America had diplomatic relations with the governments located in the territories of Soviet Bloc nations like Poland, E. Germany, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, etc because they "were the only game in town" so to speak. America wanted to have some relation with the people of those countries despite how imperfect the government representing them or vehicle of communication was.

Backtracking. There was the Polish Government in Exile in London that also claimed to represent Poles - so there was an option there. East Germany also had West Germany claiming to be the only lawful successor of the Third Reich - so there was no need to recognise the DDR.

But that still does not mean those countries were not controlled by Moscow. Moscow allowed some liberties to these countries (like allowing them to communicate with the West), but that does not mean Moscow did not control them.

There are certainly plenty of examples where Moscow wasn't controlling things. Then again, you wouldn't see this - because you're blinded with tinfoil-hat-rage.

Incidentally, there were plenty of countries supporting the Soviet Bloc - I suggest you start with a course on voting patterns in the UN.
delphiandomine   
3 Feb 2012
History / Do any Poles miss the Communist era? [35]

If it wasn't for that damn system Poland would be Spain by now.

What's curious is that Czechoslovakia was far richer than Poland, yet nowadays, Slovakia is on a par with Poland and the Czech Republic (in the cities) is about the same as Poland. Perhaps it shows that Czech-style lustracja didn't work too well?
delphiandomine   
3 Feb 2012
History / Would you classify the Poland's Communist years as a "Soviet occupation" ? [221]

All of them: the PRL was recognised by every country who recognised the Second Republic. The Vatican (until 1959), General Franco's Spain and the Irish Republic (until 1979) were the last stragglers. The US recognised them from the start.

And when it comes down to it - international recognition is what matters.

That's why Ronald Reagan told Gorbachev to "Tear down this wall"?

What has Reagan's speech got to do with recognition? If you actually knew how international relations worked, you'd know that in Europe, at least two major leaders were very much in favour of two Germanies and they had no issue with recognising both. Even West Germany recognised East Germany in the 1970's.

Good God its scary to know that an "Enemy Within" like you lives in Poland.

Is that your standard insult when the facts disagree with you?
delphiandomine   
2 Feb 2012
Law / Advantages of getting Polish citizenship [24]

Can I apply for Polish citizenship based on blood line of my mother?

No. Your grandparents would never have had Polish citizenship (as you should be aware, Poland didn't exist when they left) and so it would have never passed to your mother - and so no citizenship for you.
delphiandomine   
2 Feb 2012
Off-Topic / Book: Gogol's Taras Bulba [37]

(obviously the accusation of mental illness is entirely acceptable here).

I've never heard "Polonophobia" being called a mental illness before. Certainly - the seeing of polonophobia everywhere is a mental illness and easily treated with a visit to Poland.
delphiandomine   
2 Feb 2012
Law / Can non polish EU citizens claim unemployment assistance in Poland? [7]

In law, yes - after 3 months, you should either be able to support yourself or get out. If you remember the recent deportations from France of the Roma - it was under this law.

However - if you've got the EU residence certificate, then that's a whole new question - I'm pretty certain they can't then deport you under this law (as you'll have a valid zameldowanie). Interesting legal minefield, though.

can non-polish EU citizens claim unemployment assistance here?

Yes - provided they have the EU residence certificate and they also comply with the relevant laws on being eligible for unemployment cash.

I'm sure it burns Polish-Americans inside that we superior Brits can claim cash from Poland and they can't.