delphiandomine
5 Feb 2012
History / Would you classify the Poland's Communist years as a "Soviet occupation" ? [221]
I only look at it from the point of view that I'd rather have iron-fisted Russians running Chechyna than a bunch of dodgy Islamists who would quickly turn the state into...well, it isn't worth thinking about.
I thought that was the accepted version of things?
If "unusual" is "doing what's best for yourself and your family" - then...
That's why I say it wasn't a puppet state, but rather a tinpot regime.
With Jaruzelski, it's my personal view that he may not have trusted the Soviets at all - he was installed as their man (arguably, ever since 1945, he was Moscow's man - his rapid career rise despite his dubious background confirms this) as First Secretary - and from what we know, it may be that he felt that he had to introduce martial law. We simply don't know what was going on inside his head at that point. Civil war was becoming a possibility (remember - plenty of people owed their position to the PRL) - and given the Soviet history (including endless lies about intentions) - he may have felt that martial law was a way of keeping them out of Poland.
It's a great shame that the Moscow archives won't be opened - we could learn so much about what was going on then.
Fight back and you're a terrorist do nothing and you give legitimacy to the state, so says the law?
I only look at it from the point of view that I'd rather have iron-fisted Russians running Chechyna than a bunch of dodgy Islamists who would quickly turn the state into...well, it isn't worth thinking about.
Are you saying that the Polish army elite knew all the time that the Soviets were responsible for the crime, but went along with the lie that the Nazis did it for political reasons?
I thought that was the accepted version of things?
Well, then you have quite unusual views on these matters...
If "unusual" is "doing what's best for yourself and your family" - then...
Sure commies in Poland had some autonomy, therefore I don't buy stuff such as "Jaruzelski had no choice", however strategical issues such as membership in Warsaw Pact, red ideology etc. were undisputed.
That's why I say it wasn't a puppet state, but rather a tinpot regime.
With Jaruzelski, it's my personal view that he may not have trusted the Soviets at all - he was installed as their man (arguably, ever since 1945, he was Moscow's man - his rapid career rise despite his dubious background confirms this) as First Secretary - and from what we know, it may be that he felt that he had to introduce martial law. We simply don't know what was going on inside his head at that point. Civil war was becoming a possibility (remember - plenty of people owed their position to the PRL) - and given the Soviet history (including endless lies about intentions) - he may have felt that martial law was a way of keeping them out of Poland.
It's a great shame that the Moscow archives won't be opened - we could learn so much about what was going on then.