History /
The Greatest King of Poland? [117]
Prussians did not fight, their only attempt at besieging Warsaw turned into humiliation, the war with Russia was an effective stalemate, Poland was not losing.
You are wrong on both counts, and I am afraid that you are letting nationalist sentiment cloud you judgment.
1. It wasn't a stalemate- if it was, why did the Polish forces continually withdraw and mostly fight a rearguard action? The Russians had Warsaw in their sights, and they would have pounded it into rubble and murdered all and sundry if the king did not capitulate and surrender.
2. Though glorious in the popular imagination, Racwawice is hardly a great victory and a minor battle in the greater scheme of things. Even if for one second i were to concede and say that it was a stalemate (which it wasn't) The important thing is that the battle was fought on Polish soil-not Russian, and it was the Poles who suffered the most.
3. If the Poles would have shown any possible sign of success (which they did not) Than the Prussians would have put greater forces into the field.
4. Although the Poles had the numbers they did not have the equipment to fight a sustained battle against two professional armies.
And finally not all Poles were in favor of the revolution, many landlords actively supported the Russian forces.
So to bring things full circle-the king had no choice but to surrender.
And I am not depreciating the revolution, it was quite extraordinary by European standards. I am just looking at the matter realistically.
that is then and not than.
Anyhow further more to my earlier point they fought and lost battles(in which they were greatly outnumbered) like the Battle of Szczekociny-against the combined armies of Russia and Prussia.
They also lost the battle of Battle of Chełm.
Trust me Polish history is grand enough for you not to have to embellish it any further.