Life /
COMBATING "POLACK" JOKES [460]
Somewhat less. If that were true though, what does it say about Wall Street.
It speaks volume, you just don’t listen. The Federal Reserve is comprised of the heads of private Wall Street banks, every time a decision is made by the Fed its insider trading wouldn’t you say? Which brings us to the second point.
Are you mad? How many people a year are prosecuted? Many. Governments take it seriously.
Obviously not seriously enough. It’s a fact that Wall Street firms are making tons of money trading with Fed. Fed has obligation to announces its intention to buy particular securities in advance and Wall Street banks sell these securities to the Fed at inflated price yet another example of insider trading, so the answer should be obvious even to you. They do prosecute many, for petty crime and occasional joint but not for what Martha Steward has been accused of, an exception in this case rather than a rule.
That makes it better?
Compared to Bernie Madoff, a fine example of an upstanding Jew and his $65 billion Ponzi scheme which you haven’t commented on I would say definitely.
Martha was acting on information given to her. She did not build her wealth and a career of insider trading. It was a one-time fluke which involved a relatively small amount of money. What was it $220 thousand and the stock was not even one of her own companies.
And they made it stick. Conspiracy, obstruction of an agency proceeding, and making false statements to federal investigators.
They did not make it stick!!!! Surprise, surprise a Jew lying again, by your own admission I don’t see insider trading there, DO I?
She did act on the information passed to her to save her own money. Frankly speaking so would anyone in her place and wouldn’t even think twice it might be considered insider trading since she was not the owner and had no interest in it other than owning stock. If it was a stock in her own company even I would accuse her of being a manipulating cvnt but that’s not the case is it? The alleged lies she told the FBI were not told under oath so technically she has not even commited a perjury.
I would check the title of this thread once again if I was you, It’s
COMBATING "POLACK" JOKES In your zeal to attack Poles you forgot that and you’re way off topic.
I think both approaches were wrong and that's why I speak out.
Provided I take everything you said at face value, you speaking out against Jewish jokes yet poking fun at French as you did here and at the same time condoning the use of Polish joke make you a hypocrite which was the very point I was making. If you have a strong enough conviction that the use of ethnic or racial jokes has no place in our society, I’ll respect that view, hell I might even agree but you can’t have it both ways.