History /
WWII - who really was the first to help Poland? [900]
what would have happened if it had been the king when the war broke out.
The British monarch doesn't have any political power and didn't back then either. Edward was seen a a loose canon and would have been kept well in line by Whitehall.
controversial views on Jews, Africans and the disabled -
Kaprys, I don't need to tell you that those views were very common at the time amongst all social classes. One can't judge people of almost a hundred years ago -and remember that Edward was born in the reign of Queen Victoria - by the standards of today. On the other hand he had a genuine interest in social reform and the plight of the working man. And he refused to wear military decorations which he was awarded but felt he hadn't earned. He was enlisted during World War One but although he was in the combat zones, as heir to the throne, he wasn't allowed to fight.
Finally, there was support for facism in all walks of society before WWII when it was seen as a bulwark against the threat of Communism. Nobody knew what Hitler was going to ultimately do. It was like an extreme form of conservatism.
For God's sake, look at this forum today, after all we should have learned from the last hundred years, and you still see literate, reasonably well educated people, better educated indeed and more intelligent that Edward VIII, singing the praises of the gradual curtailment of civil liberties in Poland by the present government, celebrating it as something wonderful and talking about a 'strong' Poland...........we've had posters here saying that MEPs should be charged with treason, no less, for exercising their right to vote according to their own conscience and political persuasion.