PolishForums LIVE  /  Archives [3]    
   
Posts by Foreigner4  

Joined: 18 Nov 2007 / Male ♂
Last Post: 5 Sep 2013
Threads: Total: 12 / In This Archive: 8
Posts: Total: 1768 / In This Archive: 944
From: tychy
Speaks Polish?: yes and no
Interests: sports, politics, the economy, history, writing, yadayadayada

Displayed posts: 952 / page 17 of 32
sort: Latest first   Oldest first   |
Foreigner4   
28 Dec 2011
Life / Poland's population growth problem [44]

No Mark, that's how you live.The rest of us live just fine.

not true.
I know more than a few people living 3ppl/50m square. Good friends of mine live 4 ppl/60m square and they make well above the national average. Their flat is paid off and buying a new one is just too risky an investment at the moment. Another close friend lives 5ppl/65 m square with both he and his wife earning above the national average.
Foreigner4   
27 Dec 2011
News / Will many Poles migrate to Germany in May 2011 (after opening labor market)? [157]

so Germany have certainly got what they wanted and it is a further drain on Poland. Most of the Poles moving to Ireland/UK were the Polish unemployed and unemployable.

So the questions you have to ask yourself are:
Why do Poles feel drained by "Germany" (which is a horrible way to simplify an entire society I might add) when they should be blaming failed leadership?

Why are Poles expecting opportunities will open abroad but not at home?

Surely Poles should be questioning not what is or isn't for Poles in Germany but what is for them at home.
Foreigner4   
23 Dec 2011
Life / You are Polish if... [433]

You clap when the plane lands-You think a Big Mac is the spiciest thing you would ever eat.

that was too much awesome for just one post...more from JonnyM!
Foreigner4   
23 Dec 2011
Life / You are Polish if... [433]

if.....you laugh like a hyena during nights out on the tiles.

HOLY SH*T Seanus!!! What is with that irritating laugh?
It's like the same group of idiots have been doing this for more than 10 f*cking years now- I thought it was just me. I am relieved in a way.
Foreigner4   
17 Dec 2011
News / What part of Poland's image do you think is the most exportable? [90]

the "i'm an alcoholic but i still get the job done" inspired t-shirts would sell well - and no I don't think they're accurate but that's what people want to believe. The t-shirts that have polish inspired humor on them are pretty good too but for all I know, they're rip offs of other ideas.
Foreigner4   
17 Dec 2011
Work / What is a good salary in Wroclaw? (coordinator position for an IT company) [27]

I'll chime in here, take into account what your wife stands to make. If you pulled 6K net, that'd be ok but if she could pull in half that then you could realistically be living off her earnings and travelling/saving off yours. As long as your schedules align and you don't have to go out to eat all the time then you should be ok with >5.5 net earnings on your side and >2.5 on her side (first year of course).

Good luck.
Foreigner4   
13 Dec 2011
Food / Coffee in Poland: cheap and undrinkable / expensive and good [89]

Was it really so hard for you not to make a such an assumption?
I already wrote that I like NEITHER the people nor the coffee at starbucks. Timmy's is just really really busy and the coffee isn't enough to make up for that. Sorry if this matters to you.
Foreigner4   
13 Dec 2011
Food / Coffee in Poland: cheap and undrinkable / expensive and good [89]

Always admired the way that Starbucks managed to create some sort of mystique about the place, despite the fact that the coffee sucks and the place sucks.

Well put! Burnt, funky tasting coffee. I think the first step towards their mystique was appealing to women, who will often choose style over substance and then they managed to rope in the guys who went there to "study" and dumb crap like that.

Lots of followers to be found in those joints.
Foreigner4   
6 Dec 2011
Love / How many Polish men are Violent how much is domestic abuse reported. [129]

I agree with both of you but why do you throw in domestic abuse?

Look at the thread title

How does that relate to the war on boys.

How does that relate to the thread title?

I've followed his posts and he makes sense to me.

Judging by your inability to absorb the central theme of this thread I'm gonna put that in my "no surprise" bin.

Are you referring to self defense?

My answer is yes but, in case you were heading in this direction it is not real self defence for either men nor women (although they do claim this in court of law quite more frequently) if the "attacks" are emotional. Don't get me started on that nonsense.

The irrelevance is all yours since you introduced something not related to you quoting me.

No, you're wrong.Look at the thread title. Look at what you were writing about. Somehow you used this as a platform to sound off against feminists. Look, I agree with you on the issue but when you launch into your tirade with only the thinnest of veils, as done on this thread, it really undermines the legitimacy of what you're so up in arms about. Post #92- funny you should have brought that up because it shows exactly when you tried to hijack this thread.

Yes, there is inequality and yes, men (particularly white) are in the sights of what really seems to be a concerted emasculation agenda but no, this thread probably is not the best place to go slagging off women and denouncing feminism as a whole- it just makes you look paranoid, small and without grace.
Foreigner4   
5 Dec 2011
Love / How many Polish men are Violent how much is domestic abuse reported. [129]

True, there is a war on boys and it's infuriating. However, that does not absolve those guilty of spousal abuse (and i'm not saying that it's never okay to hit someone because it is very often very okay to hit someone but abuse is violence without just cause so anyone in the pc brigade can take note).

Zimmy- once again displays his astute command of the irrelevant for all to behold.
Foreigner4   
4 Dec 2011
Life / Is parity the answer for Polish women? [262]

I mean why is it important for the parliament to be 50% female but not the sewerpipe cleaners??

Because the execution of sewer pipe cleaning is based on physical performance. The only measure of the job is whether the sewer pipe is clean or not. Representation isn't a factor, only an objective result which is measurable based on liquid flow.

The execution of being a politician is something entirely different and much more complex. Obtaining the post of political representative involves a very different vetting process.

The capacity to which either job is executed is entirely different from the other and that is why I was originally opposed to using that as any kind of argument against the question in the title- because it is a weak argument that holds no water.

That still doesn't mean I support the idea in the thread title, it just means I can spot weak criticism and that was it.

We agree on this, I think.

Yes.

It's still not for choice but at least it isn't as unreasonable as selling drugs for financial gain, right?

I think you're right but a lot of pharmaceutical firms would disagree.
Foreigner4   
4 Dec 2011
Life / Is parity the answer for Polish women? [262]

I was using it in argument, For4. I know that Scotland now doesn't accept any such discrimination on public courses.

so then are you telling me you don't have any current examples of the discrimination you're arguing against? *edit* sorry I forgot you are against this on private courses as well. Fair enough but you don't have any examples of this happening on publicly funded courses so I just don't see your point*

I agree that in the example you gave of your father, discrimination would be unfair and "wrong" imo but I never proposed it be allowed in such a situation, I proposed it be condoned if adopted in a truly private setting and it would only be condoned to the point the private owner could make such practices profitable (and I don't think they could for the long haul).
Foreigner4   
4 Dec 2011
Life / Is parity the answer for Polish women? [262]

Ok, I missed it, please highlight the current actual example you have where this happens on public facilities.
When you do that, I'll say that is wrong.
When I won't do that will be if a private business owner who is not being supported by public funds chooses to do that. I'll think it's probably not a good way to run a business but I wouldn't worry about it.
Foreigner4   
4 Dec 2011
Life / Is parity the answer for Polish women? [262]

I'm talking reality, not hypotheticals.

well then reference a current example

For4, women WERE discriminated against for a long time. It's a fact! I remember my dad playing a round with a female colleague and her not being allowed in for a jar. That's discrimination, pure and simple. A man can be a guest and gain entry. A woman must pay for membership. That's the deal!!

That WAS the deal!!
The discrimination you referenced is out of date and that's a fact! It was wrong then and it'd be wrong now if it took place on publicly held facility.
Foreigner4   
4 Dec 2011
Life / Is parity the answer for Polish women? [262]

For4, so you are saying that men spend more on refreshments than women?

no. I'm saying it'd be profitable for a club to cater to both genders and in most cases it is and that's why you don't see much if any gender based customer discrimination.

How does he profit more from men? Remember that most drive to golf courses so likely have a shandy and that's it. You are saying that business is the reason for excluding women? Even the math is hardly on your side here.

jesus wept seanus, read it again- I phrased my example in the second conditional- it was hypothetical.

I'm talking about domestic/municipal courses here.

Well jesus christ seanus why not put that in the original scenario- that changes everything!
Foreigner4   
4 Dec 2011
Life / Is parity the answer for Polish women? [262]

Aha, it's about financial gain and not ethical principle, am I right?

no. In one sense treatment of the individual is the issue but at the same time only with regards to rights in society- I'd argue that the right to pursue gainful employment is more important than being able to play a round of golf somewhere. You can go play a round of golf somewhere or take up another hobby if no one wants your business. If someone is refused work based on gender or ethnicity then that is a might bit more terminal. Of course then you run into the people saying affirmative action policies are so awful, because the implementation of such policies do refuse work based on gender or ethnicity. However where I counter that, is by saying that if it benefits society that such discrimination happen then it becomes warranted.

I'm pretty lucid right now if you catch my drift so apologies if that seems too trippey.

For4, my point is clear. There is typically one clubhouse per golf course and there is no good reason to exclude women.

and I thought I made it clear that the only way a clubhouse owner would make such decision was if he or she saw financial gain in the matter and I can't imagine a clubhouse owner getting far ahead through discriminating against a 15-25% customer base. I just don't think it'd happen in place where the owner thought it'd be profitable to do that. Again, no one would be getting hurt in that situation except the club house owner. If a couple couldn't share a drink together there, then they'd go somewhere else.
Foreigner4   
4 Dec 2011
Life / Is parity the answer for Polish women? [262]

Sport is for people, For4. Given that the 19th hole, i.e the clubhouse, is often used for refreshment purposes after a gruelling round, why deny women that which men often look forward to after a game?

I'd leave that question up to the owner of said golf club. If he or she saw financial gain in it then that would be their choice, if it turned out to be unprofitable then that'd be their folly. Either way, in such a case no one is being hurt imo.

For4, straight to the point. Is it about treatment of people or not? Can we agree that that's the commonality here?

No, I'm not so sure it is. Gimme a moment or 8 to give it a chewing over.
Foreigner4   
4 Dec 2011
Life / Is parity the answer for Polish women? [262]

No.
If we are talking about gainful employment then the best candidate ought to be selected based on the aggregate benefit to the employer and society overall.

If we are talking about a group of men or women who want to create a club that caters to only one gender then that should be their choice. I agree the two issues are similar but they are also very different.
Foreigner4   
4 Dec 2011
Life / Is parity the answer for Polish women? [262]

In my eyes, there is no good reason to debar women from sitting in a clubhouse

I dunno man, if a group of men or women feel so inclined, they should legally be free to have a clubhouse in which membership is gender based. There will be other places which will cater to the ladies, it's unfair to force everyone to cater to everyone.
Foreigner4   
4 Dec 2011
Life / Is parity the answer for Polish women? [262]

Bravo, Seanus. Bravo!
and that is coming from a person who opposes how affirmative action has manifested itself but still sees how it can better be used.
Foreigner4   
4 Dec 2011
Life / Is parity the answer for Polish women? [262]

I've processed your views just fine

No, you haven't- the binary processing you need to grasp the ramifications of what I've written just isn't there in your case or you're guilty of intellectual dishonesty. You have not provided one iota of reason to back up any of your grievances with what I've said; rather just a few quotes taken out of context and an attempt to cling to them like a seal hugging an ice flow, surrounded by orcas. Logic is an orca for you and you are a seal.

I feel bad for you in that you get angry when it has become clear to you that you are outclassed. You use discrimination every day to live your life and you're not even capable of understanding that.

I'm sure there's a conversation about video games or smart phones that you're better equipped to comment on.

I think I'm done with you now. Bye.
Foreigner4   
4 Dec 2011
Life / Is parity the answer for Polish women? [262]

P3
^While I don't support the notion of mandating who can and can't run for government in the current democratic system, the argument you've presented is a red herring. There is no logic for it in this context, it just doesn't hold up. If you need that explained for you then check out the last few pages in this thread and if you don't get it then get back to me.
Foreigner4   
4 Dec 2011
Life / Is parity the answer for Polish women? [262]

Hmm, or maybe you struggle with your own English comprehension?

No, it's just I can't make it any simpler for you and you seem to be struggling with that, so anything more nuanced than a "hell yeah" or a "hell no" is proving hard for you to process.

Let's recap for you:

: ... In many cases, affirmative action is a poison but in other cases it is definitely a good idea. The problem has been that people have been dishonest with it...

That is not tacit support to the proposal of the thread title "Is parity the answer for Polish women?" It is only recognition that affirmative action, when implemented honestly and in select situations actually makes a lot of sense.

I have stated numerous times I am against the idea of mandated representation. Is that something you
a) don't understand
or
b) haven't read?
or
c) are choosing to ignore?

Do I support the use of affirmative action in some instances? I gave a clear example of a situation in which it would be irresponsible not to be discriminatory in a hiring situation. Did you

a) not read that
or
b) fail to understand it?
or
c) choose to ignore it?

Your problem is that you're trying to turn this into an all or nothing issue, in that this practice must exist in every facet of industry or in none. Most people can't see there is an overall benefit to society if this is done properly but because it isn't being used properly in society they are completely against it- you seem to be in that group.

[/quote]

You're basically advocating replacing one form of discrimination

What is this "one form of discrimination you speak of?

After you get back to me on that then mull this over:
Every choice you make is based on discrimination. Every employee you hire, every time you choose between pump 1,2 or 3; every time you choose which sales person to approach; who to talk to in a bar, etc, ALL OF IT is based off discrimination.

So while you seem to be "against" any form of discrimination, you use it every day to live your life to the best of your ability.

Tell me if you have processed that and
a) agree
b) disagree
c) don't understand
Foreigner4   
4 Dec 2011
Life / Is parity the answer for Polish women? [262]

Well, and this is why I'm having hard time discussing this with you. You're basically advocating replacing one form of discrimination with a different form of discrimination yet you're calling him "dumb"? Really?

No not really. I am not advocating that system. How you have arrived at that conclusion is an indication of your inability to process the written word in English. Good luck with that.
Foreigner4   
4 Dec 2011
Life / Is parity the answer for Polish women? [262]

Me: Foreigner4: What would be inherently wrong then with a political system of representation in which there is an accurate ratio of representation based on population?

Nothing!It is wrong however, to mandate quotas thru (government) force. Let the people decide by voting. Nobody stops women or anyone else, at least in western countries from voting their choices.

So if through the process of discussion people actually chose such a system be mandated then what the hell is your problem. People talk about the pros and cons of an idea and your up in arms, yet at the same time you defend people's choice to that end. You're whining and sniveling about the prospect of people discussing the merits of a notion.

We get it- you're intimidated by women. Now get lost.
Foreigner4   
3 Dec 2011
Life / Is parity the answer for Polish women? [262]

No, I just don't want people, men or women to have 'wrongs' in the form of quotas.

What would be inherently wrong then with a political system of representation in which there is an accurate ratio of representation based on population?
We could argue that our current system is unjust in other ways. But limp-wristed liberals like yourself who think it's more important to have the choice of doing the right thing and understanding what doing the right thing is won't understand that. You'd probably hypothesize on the importance of choice if you saw a woman laid out in a burning building- ZIMMY the coward and a woman hater to boot.

Hipster douche bags like yourself pretend to be working class and then turn around a pretend to be socialites when it suits them. Yeah yeah the king of long-haul truck driving is living it up in his super 8 motels. Give it up you delusional twat- everyone knows you really just hate the idea of confident women so you pain them all with the same brush. Every other post you've written here has been laced with malice towards women and it shows a deep seated contempt for women. What's the matter? Mom didn't give you enough muffins last birthday? You make me sick.

regarding animals and choice:

It is one of the principle features that does.

Sorry muffin top but millions of animals make choices as regularly as you do and probably of much greater consequence. Your failure to acknowledge that only illustrates how inept you are at processing truths that are obvious to everyone else strutting above your level. My suggestion is take the stairs on your way up cause the lift will only confuse you.