hague1cmaeron
22 May 2011
History / Poland and Orientalism [115]
Firstly i said nothing about how the Russians viewed the Poles, and frankly I could not care less. As for the Germans, my argument was that they did not to my knowledge, equate it with the oriental, if they did than it probably tells you all need to know about the Germans.
They were the first to put into practice the idea of an enlightened state as envisaged by some of the philosophers, that is why they are credited as having the first modern constitution in Europe.
As for "but this constitution did little to improve the situation of the people", well obviously, the Prussians, Russians and Austrians wouldn't allow it to happen. Because as stated by Frederick at the time, they were afraid of a powerful Poland. Prussia only abolished serfdom in 1807, whose say that Poland wouldn't have done so earlier if it had the chance, as envisaged by Kosciuszko? As for Austria-Hungary it was only abolished in 1848!
As for "Prussia and Austria also introduced compulsory schooling at the same time", that is not what I argued, my argument was based on the 1st ministry of education, on which you are in need of some enlightened yourself: 'The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth's Commission of National Education (Polish: Komisja Edukacji Narodowej) formed in 1773'
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_in_Poland
Not until the implementation of the Prussian General Land Law of 1794 did the state first attempt to take responsibility for educational institutions. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prussian_education_system
As for Austria, it would certainly have been later. So no it was not at the same time Poland was at the vanguard.
That wasn't a march(:
begrudgingly i have to concede it.
You don't understand me HC, it's not about how Poles view themselves...you stated repeatedly that the Germans/Prussians viewed Poland as advanced and were even scared.
Firstly i said nothing about how the Russians viewed the Poles, and frankly I could not care less. As for the Germans, my argument was that they did not to my knowledge, equate it with the oriental, if they did than it probably tells you all need to know about the Germans.
An enlightened monarch doesn't equal an enlightened society.
They were the first to put into practice the idea of an enlightened state as envisaged by some of the philosophers, that is why they are credited as having the first modern constitution in Europe.
As for "but this constitution did little to improve the situation of the people", well obviously, the Prussians, Russians and Austrians wouldn't allow it to happen. Because as stated by Frederick at the time, they were afraid of a powerful Poland. Prussia only abolished serfdom in 1807, whose say that Poland wouldn't have done so earlier if it had the chance, as envisaged by Kosciuszko? As for Austria-Hungary it was only abolished in 1848!
As for "Prussia and Austria also introduced compulsory schooling at the same time", that is not what I argued, my argument was based on the 1st ministry of education, on which you are in need of some enlightened yourself: 'The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth's Commission of National Education (Polish: Komisja Edukacji Narodowej) formed in 1773'
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_in_Poland
Not until the implementation of the Prussian General Land Law of 1794 did the state first attempt to take responsibility for educational institutions. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prussian_education_system
As for Austria, it would certainly have been later. So no it was not at the same time Poland was at the vanguard.
eh..
That wasn't a march(:
We have the best ;)
begrudgingly i have to concede it.