JonnyM
1 Feb 2012
History / Would you classify the Poland's Communist years as a "Soviet occupation" ? [221]
In your opinion. Re. the 'Soviet satellite' thing, Poland was, after all, in the Warsaw Pact rather than NATO. In answer to your question, 'Soviets' were assemblies of workers maintaining the dictatorship of the proletariat in certain countries. But not Poland.
Not all single (or no) party states are occupations. It is an irrelevance.
They remained in accordance with the Warsaw Pact.
True - it was recognised as legitimate.
This is not a definition of occupation.By the same twisted logic, you could say that Chile under Pinochet was occupied by the US.
Could Britain 'remove' the US troops?
A meaningless phrase. It was established by the former member states of the League of Nations, led by the US.
Next!
In your opinion. Re. the 'Soviet satellite' thing, Poland was, after all, in the Warsaw Pact rather than NATO. In answer to your question, 'Soviets' were assemblies of workers maintaining the dictatorship of the proletariat in certain countries. But not Poland.
Not all single (or no) party states are occupations. It is an irrelevance.
They remained in accordance with the Warsaw Pact.
True - it was recognised as legitimate.
This is not a definition of occupation.By the same twisted logic, you could say that Chile under Pinochet was occupied by the US.
Could Britain 'remove' the US troops?
A meaningless phrase. It was established by the former member states of the League of Nations, led by the US.
Next!