PolishForums LIVE  /  Archives [3]    
   
Posts by Ironside  

Joined: 26 Feb 2009 / Male ♂
Warnings: 1 - A		 Last Post: 5 Aug 2025
Threads: Total: 52 / In This Archive: 18
Posts: Total: 13570 / In This Archive: 5887 		From: The Royal Palace of Warsaw
Speaks Polish?: Better than most

Displayed posts: 5905 / page 114 of 197
sort: Latest first   Oldest first   |
Ironside   
22 Mar 2012
Life / Multiracial Poles [154]

FlaglessPole:
I have to bang a black chick so that my progeny can jump higher.

See advantages, your progeny can pick up fruits form higher branches.
Ironside   
22 Mar 2012
History / Poland did reasonably well in land terms out of the postwar settlement [270]

Nope, you misunderstood me.

Gdansk as other cites and citizens of the Teutonic Order, "voted" to become subject of the king of Poland.
They never decided to join Prussia they were taken by force. From 1793 to 1918 they were subject to rules, laws and schools of Prussia.
What Polonization ? Gdansk was Polish city, partitions should be nullified, that all I'm saying. That part about Gdansk being multicultural city wasn't an argument, I was showing off.

When the old Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth went to the dogs in the late 18th century,

No, the Commonwealth was murdered by conspiracy and force.

Even if Poland had survived the turbulent 19th century as a state it is highly unlikely that it would have had the demographic power to Polonize all its ethnic minorities, so it would have lost Gdansk/Danzig anyway.

It debatable and I beg to differ.
I do not contest allegiance of Germans in Gdansk in 1918. I just say that doesn't matter in my opinion as Gdansk was Polish city regardless. They would have to decide for themselves. The partition of Poland had consequents for Germans as well as for Poles.

"Unpleasant" for Poles:
- they lost their country
"Pleasant" for Germans:
- Prussia became power and unified German states.
After Poland reemerged there was few "unpleasant" issues for Germans, mostly paid by Germans living in borderlands. I'm not saying that it was nice but it was only fair.

After all loosing ones statehood is much more "unpleasant" on so many levels than loosing one city or province that wasn't rightly yours in the first place.
Ironside   
21 Mar 2012
News / Drunken Brit beats up young Polish policewoman [62]

On the whole, Poles serve a useful function in the UKs job market.

Poland should make a use of most of the workforce in Poland. There enough work if Poland's governance were handled properly.
Ironside   
21 Mar 2012
Life / Struggling young Polish couple - try to solve their problem [176]

nd the unemployment figures are far healthier on the Polish side than on the German side.

Still wages are much healthier on the German side than on the Polish side. Just saying - facts-not-fiction.

hey aren't quite earning German salaries, but they're usually earning much better than those in comparable small towns inland.

Because of customers from Germany, right ?

That means nothing if there's no jobs to pay Euro.

They get handsome benefits for unemployed.

Ask yourself - why are flats in Frankfurt (Oder), Gubin (or is it Guben? I never remember which is which) and Gorlitz are occupied by Poles, not Germans.

Because those flats on the German side of the border cost only fraction of flats in Poland.

She might be considering it, but she's not going to find it. She's living in dreamland (and it shows that she has no real world experience) if she thinks that people will hire a Pole over a German in that part of the world.

For that kind of job ie ****** job? Yeah! I'm sure she can find it. facts-not-fiction you are full of fiction you must be delph or Harry. In case I'm wrong they are like Laurens&Hardy on PF.

I appreciate that you're looking at it from a pure "you can earn more in Germany", but the reality on the ground is that the Polish side of the Odra is doing far, far better than the German side.

You mean German side of the Oder ? In a sense of immediate area ?You may be right in a way but still they got better infrastructure and of course if you are omitting Berlin !
Ironside   
21 Mar 2012
Life / Multiracial Poles [154]

People were mixing globalism or not and they will be mixing. Some people, but there is no must as you seems to propagate here.
It just your idea fix or lite-motive of your trolling.
Ironside   
21 Mar 2012
Life / Multiracial Poles [154]

Interracial mixing is inevitable

says who? I fail to see your point, all I know you cannot be trusted and most likely you are obese troll.
Ironside   
18 Mar 2012
Life / Multiracial Poles [154]

What do you mean in the long run?

grandchildren are not that blessed by the mixed heritage
Ironside   
18 Mar 2012
Life / Multiracial Poles [154]

Advantages of interracial mating explained from a genetic standpoint.

that is blx ! There are advantages in some interracial mixing but it doesn't really such advantageous in long run.
Why you are obsessed with that nonsense ?
Ironside   
17 Mar 2012
History / Poland did reasonably well in land terms out of the postwar settlement [270]

I'm telling you and telling and yet you come back again and again and again asking the same question. Are you mentally challenged Harry or it is that you cannot fact the truth.

Well Harry are you ask for detailed instruction how to pay your bills ? For goodness sake you just pay them!
I think that you are being difficult.
Ironside   
16 Mar 2012
History / Poland did reasonably well in land terms out of the postwar settlement [270]

If you could go into detail about the ways in which Britain failed to live up to her treaty obligations to Poland, I'd be happy to address your points

Why would I need to go into details ?
The crux of the matter in that case is simple - they didn't fulfilled their obligations and no amount of play-words will change that.
Ironside   
15 Mar 2012
History / Poland did reasonably well in land terms out of the postwar settlement [270]

Why is it that scum like you feel

Personal insult - should he be baned?

aybe that is why you lie about them: you claim to be in some way Polish but you have never done a single thing for Poland; they were in no way Polish but still made the ultimate sacrifice for Poland.

Obsessive repetitive rant signifying a mental flow or illness.

BTW, isn't suspension usually threatened for posters who 'mis-spell' other poster's names?

Instead of being attention seeker and whining to the mods to complain about mistreatment by others posters you could face the fact the Britain and France in September 1939 had not acted as they promised to \Poland in the treaty.

why is so hard for you to admit the truth ?Is wallowing in denial your pleasure?

Most people I know are sick to death of "moan moan history moan moan". They're looking to 2041, not 1941.

People you know from what you are posting must be the kind to be eradicated. Most likely some SB or others Soviets collaborators progeny.
Ironside   
14 Mar 2012
News / American soldiers beat up in Torun, Łódź [141]

Mods: how long do I have to put up with this gentleman's constant stream of personal abuse?

Given the fact that it is not me who is taking threads off topic on regular basic, gang up to goad and provoke posters one disagree with, accuse people of all kinds of vice, dish personal abuse as it come and make a nuisance out of himself, cannot face the facts and much more ...I suppose that I can sleep safe in knowledge that if I will get banned you will follow !

You have no sense of humor Harry and I don't mean laughing at somebody's misfortune, sad Harry.
Ironside   
14 Mar 2012
News / American soldiers beat up in Torun, Łódź [141]

what a stupid thread.

Why are you so agitated fuss?

A man in black tracksuit and with a hood on head approached to Chechen women and hit to face of one of them.

It well maybe one of you, Harry or delphinium just to rise the number of foreign victims in Poland in order to prove that Poles are racist.
Ironside   
14 Mar 2012
History / Poland did reasonably well in land terms out of the postwar settlement [270]

The only justification for such a claim could be that Danzig/Gdansk belonged to the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth for centuries. This, of course, is true,

Indeed.

but old Poland was a supranational realm, therefore the allegiance of the inhabitants of Gdansk/Danzig went to a state in which they could maintain their German language and culture unaffected from Warsaw.

Er ...sorry to burst your bubble but Gdansk taken from Poland by the means of robbery, plain and simple. It had little to do with the allegiance of the inhabitants, who didn't think that their German language and culture need to be defended. Only 150 years of Prussian state schools propaganda made their progeny gradually change their allegiance.

Also Gdansk was multicultural with Polish, Scottish, Jewish and Dutch communities.

The second Polish republic from 1919 to 1939 was something completly different, because it was designed to be a nation state reserved for the Polish nation alone. Other nations were suppressed there.

Yes, Poles learned well from their oppressors ie Prussian and Russian backwood tyrannic and undemocratic empires. Like always you (Russian and German) went ahead of Poles and invented genocide, ethnic cleanings and total war.

And this was not about driving Prussian administration officials and soldiery out of the country, which would be understandable, but ordinary Germans that lived in the country for centuries had to leave, often by force

If you are talking about The second Republic, nobody was forced to leave, as for as I remember (I could be wrong) Germans had to pledge their loyalty to the Polish state.

Nothing wrong with that.

he League of Nation

and ONZ should be disbanded.

My formulation surely is a bit graphic, but I can't see why you think there is no truth in it.

OK ! You asked for it.
France (husband)pimped Czechoslovakia to Germany, she didn't protest but spread her legs, Poland fondled her breast. You say that Poland was an accomplice ? Firstly Are you serious, secondly, what rape?

Reading your posts here I figured you are a friend of the open word and you like playing hardball, so I am sure you can cope with it.

Oh I have no problem with playing hardball but I object to your graphic formulation because there is no true in it.
Ironside   
14 Mar 2012
News / American soldiers beat up in Torun, Łódź [141]

Unfounded?

Why don't you go there and teach them about errors of they way.
By the way would they behavior been acceptable if those soldiers would have been white ?
Ironside   
13 Mar 2012
History / A little reminder for those Brits that ***** about Poles [143]

Why do you keep repeating this claim when you are unable to say what assistance it was within Britain's power to give in September or October 1939 which was not given?

I answered many times stop your repetitive lies ! they should have Bombed German military installations, I mean full scale air raids, not some token and random actions.

Show me the part of the treaty which says that.

Look for it yourself!

They did.

No they didn't ! There were not major military offensive against Germany in September 1939, are you compulsive lier ?

They did. Stop lying about the hundreds of British service men who gave their lives.

They didn't ! you are an idiot if you really believe that those token actions were fulfilling obligations to Poland ?We both know that you are not an idiot just a sick man who get his kicks from it.Stop it.

Can you go into detail about how Britain failed to honour her obligations? Will you? No, you will not because you can not.

I can, and I did answer you many time, stop lying that I didn't.
Stop lying about me lying but you of curse cannot because you have health problems.
Ironside   
13 Mar 2012
Language / New Dialects in Western and Northern Poland [24]

But all of them chose to leave for Germany and their language got extinct in the 1970s or 1980s.

pity !
FS good posts, quality posts.
Ironside   
13 Mar 2012
History / A little reminder for those Brits that ***** about Poles [143]

Did Britain and France declare war on Germany - yes or no? What more do you want?

So what ? You seems to be failing to see that France and Britain didn't honored their treaty with Poland by not delivering military help as promised.

Your speculation about what could happened are just pure s-f stuff!

Like they did when Germany invaded Czechoslovakia.

They haven't had a mutual defense treaty with CS specifically mentioned Germany and CS didn't defend herself at all.

But still you refuse to answer the question of what assistance was it within Britain's power to give in September or October 1939 which was not given.

I refuse to discus with you on your terms ie accepting your stipulations.
I say.

First of all Britain and France meant to coordinate their military efforts against Germany.
Secondly the treaty mean for them to take military action imminently.
It was specified that France should lunch major offensive against Germany no later than14 of September.
British supposed to bomb German military installation and use their Navy.
In fact they never honored their promises and obligation no matter how hard you try to justify it!Facts are facts!
You questions are asked in malicious intend of sidestepping the issue!
France and Britain meant to act together, and it doesn't matter if the blame for abandoning Poland lies with France in 50% or 51%, Britain share that responsibility.

The British were viewed by Hitler as natural allies of Germany.

Jews were viewed as pests by Hitler - so what ?
Poland was offered place in Hitler's camp - and ?
Stop talking rubbish just to justify your views.
Ironside   
13 Mar 2012
History / A little reminder for those Brits that ***** about Poles [143]

Whether Britain and France really came to the aid of Poland

Thats the point !

I don't see your problem

I don't see your problem.

Britain and France declared war on Germany (not vice versa) and officially started WW2 with that declaration. They could as well have ignored the attack on Poland, and you would all speak German (or Russian) today if that would have happened.

Really ? They could as well join Germany in their war against Poland.Should we thank them for their restrain or maybe you should read less of the S-F literature ?
Ironside   
13 Mar 2012
History / A little reminder for those Brits that ***** about Poles [143]

They did.

did they ? Well everyday I can learn something new. Could perhaps point out where those bombing were exercised. How many German military installations had been bombed and how many German planes had been withdrawn form the front in Poland to be used against that new threat?

Hell, I'm all ears!

Stop lying about the brave British airmen who died fighting for your freedom and theirs:

Lying ? Are you delusional I haven't said the word about British airmen. Do not change the subject.
We talking about British ruling class.

he point is that you are utterly unable to go into detail about what assistance it was within Britain's power to give in September or October 1939 which was not given; instead you just tell foul lies.

The point is that you are asking about those details to muddle the simple issue we are presented with here - Britain in September 1939 haven't given any significant military assistance to Poland.

Anyway all those issues had to be coordinated with French land offensive expected on the 14 September.
What would be the point of presenting a plan of the air campaign with listed German targets other than your nitpick at it.
We are Talking about political decisions, because decision not to help Poland as promised had been a political decision and have a little to do with military issues.

Well, they bombed German naval targets on September 4th and continued sorties, even bombing the Ruhr and Monchengladbach in early 1940

In 1939, following the German invasion of Poland, the United Kingdom and France declared war on Germany and the war in the West began. Britain attempted to bomb German warships and light vessels in several harbors on 3 and 4 September

It is not what I would call campaign. Also for Poland only September matters, not that one bomb a month would make a lot of difference.

Campaign according to McMillan dictionary:

a series of actions by an army trying to win a war
I don't see series of action aimed at wining the war but rather pathetic attempts at harassing the enemy.
According to the free dictionary :
1.A series of military operations undertaken to achieve a large-scale objective during a war. (What was the goal of said bombings?)
2. An operation or series of operations energetically pursued to accomplish a purpose. ( what purpose ? Making Hitler agitated in hope he will have a heart attack?)

3.To engage in an operation planned to achieve a certain goal. ( what would be a goal of those bombings ? An excuse at honoring the treaty? so called smokescreen to hid the fact that treaty with Poland was intentionally broken by the political decision ?)
Ironside   
13 Mar 2012
History / A little reminder for those Brits that ***** about Poles [143]

Nice to know that you also lied about putting me on your ignore list.

Oh but I did. You know that you can remove poster from ignore list as well.

the question of what assistance it was within Britain's power to give in September or October 1939 which was not given.

They should have bombed German military installations as they promised. Not that British ruling class was short of promises and treaties they never intended to honor.

The point is they had never intended (like France )to honor that treaty.
Ironside   
13 Mar 2012
History / A little reminder for those Brits that ***** about Poles [143]

While you are waiting for that to happen, perhaps you can go into detail about the way or ways in which Britain failed to live up to her treaty obligations?

biiiiiiiiiiiiiiip ....anybody there ? I told you already many time !