PolishForums LIVE  /  Archives [3]    
   
Posts by Ironside  

Joined: 26 Feb 2009 / Male ♂
Warnings: 1 - A
Last Post: 26 Aug 2025
Threads: Total: 53 / In This Archive: 18
Posts: Total: 13690 / In This Archive: 5887
From: The Royal Palace of Warsaw
Speaks Polish?: Better than most

Displayed posts: 5905 / page 104 of 197
sort: Latest first   Oldest first   |
Ironside   
28 Jul 2012
History / Did British public protest against the sell out of Poland to the Soviets? [286]

Harry,once again,my bad;I meant Versailles.

It is completely off topic!
Focus! They lost the ball. That gone and done.
Czechoslovakia done in as well.
The only country in the region still independent Poland.What they do? Promise help in case of war with Germany. Contrary to what Harry claims that treaty promised substantial military help.

The only way they could help was to attack Germany. French Army on land and British navy and air forces on the sea and in the air.

Not later than on ten day of war.
Ironside   
27 Jul 2012
History / Did British public protest against the sell out of Poland to the Soviets? [286]

Ironside,I know promises weren't kept,but to insinuate that this was deliberate

That diplomacy.
You are forgetting that they couldn't predict what will happen.
For them it was like - a good move, Blocking Germany from the east and at the same time keeping Poland from joining German camp.

They were hoping for the best.*maybe) Germany blocked and our guarantee will stop them from attacking Poland,

.
Ironside   
27 Jul 2012
History / Did British public protest against the sell out of Poland to the Soviets? [286]

It's strange to me that any one would say that England sold Poland out

Not sold out.
The problem here is that Britain (and France)made some promises. Never fulfilled them. That is the fact - there is no sense to discus it.

Questions open to debate:
Why they promised and never delivered?
Was it diplomatic game aimed at stopping German consolidation of Europe, to be precise to keep Poland form joining the German camp(axis alliance)?
If not why would they promise something they wasn't able to deliver? Wouldn't that make them chronically inept?

The Red army

The red army has nothing to do with it, Russian invaded Poland on 17th of September. Britain and France were supposed to come to aid of Poland no later than on ten of September.
Ironside   
27 Jul 2012
History / Did British public protest against the sell out of Poland to the Soviets? [286]

A disgusting comment, even by your low standards.

That is something you need to prove or somebody may take you for a slanderer.

Keep on telling that lie, it'll never have any truth in it.

So, why don't you prove it? eh?

You mean the Polish sailors who ran away before the war started or the ones who went to sea once, dumped their mines over the side of the boat and then didn't put to sea again?

That is a disgusting comment for which alone you deserve to be despised, by the way, please do not lie any more about your love for Poland.

Fine. So, in what way did Britain fail to fulfil her obligation to aid Poland in 1939?

That would be your cue -

The methods of applying the undertakings of mutual assistance provided for by the present Agreement are established between the competent naval, military and air authorities of the Contracting Parties.

Those details you are asking for, just find adequate documents. I know what they promised, you find it out.

Which of course brings us on to another question: did the Polish public protest against the sell out of Czechoslovakia to the Nazis and their own army taking part in the Nazi invasion of Czechoslovakia?

Of curse for trolls. In fact that subject has nothing to do with the subject debated.

We've definitely never invaded a neighbour wearing German helmets!

Yes, only tinfoil hats:

The Poles on here bleat

Are you Polish? The only bleating in here is of your making.
Ironside   
25 Jul 2012
History / Did British public protest against the sell out of Poland to the Soviets? [286]

You are the one claiming that Britain could have done more, s

NO! That what you are saying that I'm claiming.
I'm saying that Britain didn't fulfil obligation to aid Poland in 1939. Nothing more and nothing less. It is you who claims that she did fulfil her obligation.

So, for a fourth time I'm asking you to answer my question (post 136).
Also since you claim that Britain fulfilled her obligation to aid Poland - prove it!
Ironside   
25 Jul 2012
History / Did British public protest against the sell out of Poland to the Soviets? [286]

Why don't you simply admit that you cannot go into detail about it? And tell us why you cannot (not that you need to, it is blatantly obvious why you cannot)

Why should I go into detail about it? It is not me who promised Poland aid!It is you who should go into details and provide us with evidence of Britain using all available resources to the aid of Poland in 1939.

Why don't you answer my question?(post 136) How many times do I need to ask you? Are you unable to answer it? Is it because you know that what you are claiming is rubbish and you know it,

Was it

Was it your education or your drinking habit that you are unable to provide simple answer to a simple question. Instead of going about some unimportant and off-topic rubbish just to use expression - "smug Poles", maybe you could write few lines on the subject? i.e. Why you think that only French are to blame?
Ironside   
25 Jul 2012
History / Did British public protest against the sell out of Poland to the Soviets? [286]

No, as you have been told many times in the past. But do feel free to lie about the British sailors who were killed in September 1939.

Yet again you refuse to answer my questions addressed to you.
Yet again you answer questions not addressed to you.
So yet again I ask you to answer questions addressed to you or restrain yourself from posting on the subject.
Ironside   
25 Jul 2012
History / Did British public protest against the sell out of Poland to the Soviets? [286]

we should have sabre rattled Polish

Well, I think you should read few historical books and documents yourself and I don't mean German propaganda or its repetition in British books written to justify themselves from making Poland fighting alone Germany in 1939.

Matbe we should stop giving them money now to thank them!

You should give yourself an enema, you badly need it.

Id say 50 odd years of the Soviets occupying eastern Europe would show Britain had the right idea all

Ah really? So your are saying that the WWII is British fault? Wow and I was here thinking that you are British defender.:D
You should think sometime before you switch into your nationalistic mode.

Britains Navy

So British Navy was idle while their allies were fighting?

You dont need to assume anything, just read the historical documents..

So, maybe for once you indulge me and provide some links or quotes of documents you have in mind along with a clear line of reasoning which would provide us with reasons for which Britain (and France) didn't fulfil their obligation to Poland in September 1939.

Instead of refreshing old anti-Polish propaganda in an attempt to dodge the issue or somehow justify the way Britain acted in 1939.
Poland didn't have to fight Germany, treaty with France and Britain ensured that she did.
Ironside   
25 Jul 2012
History / Did British public protest against the sell out of Poland to the Soviets? [286]

And the fact is that Britain did come to Poland's aid. You wish to claim that Britain could have done more, so you must tell us what further aid it was within Britain's power to give but was not given.

No, I do not wish to claim that Britain could do more, I wish to claim that Britain should make a considerable impact on the enemy,to fulfil her obligation. You wish to claim that formal declaration of war against Germany and few skirmishes were all she has been able to do?Prove it!

How interesting to see you trying to argue with what I do not say: it is a clear sign that you cannot argue with what I do say.

What you say is immaterial unless you prove that Britain in September 1939 was unable to carry out a full fledged military action either by navy or air-force or preferably by the combination of those.

The treaty makes no mention of "fully-fledged offensive". The treaty says "all the support and assistance in its [the other party's] power." So tell us what support and assistance it was within Britain's power to give but was not given.

That the letter of the treaty but not the spirit. You are saying that Polish government signed treaty which left to discretion of France and Britain a manner and a way in which they would come to the aid of Poland. What country would sign such a treaty, are you claiming that members of Polish government were retards? Well, such outrageous claims need to be proved. Please prove that Poland signed such a treaty and that members of Polish government had intelligence of a bright gibbon or for ever keep your silence!

The two standpoints are not mutualy exclusive. Its fair to say on the one hand britian did what was right for britiain and at the same time point out the french were the ones who were supposed to actually fight the germans. britains Navy was there to stop the German fleet escaping into the Atlantic,not to go on a suicide mission into the baltic.

That is all very nice but France and Britain were the world powers and were allied for over thirty years, so even if we assume that France was to fight on land but Britain was to use her navy and air-force against Germany.Also could pressure France into action, all in all at least 50% of blame for September 1939 lies with Britain.

Neither did Poland, they assured every ally that they could hold out against germany for at least 2 months...

Well, they could! You seems to be forgetting that Poland have been attacked also by Soviet Russian which considerably changed equation.
Allies were supposed to lunch full fledged offensive no later than on ten day of war, but they decided against that even before Soviets invaded (17).

Polish Army effectivly crumbled within hours of the invasion is it?
I suppose its Britains fault that the soviets joined in within two weeks too?
lets face it, you guys were lost from 4 30 am on the 1st of september and there was naff all any contempory Ally could have done about it, we managed to hold out by the skin of our teeth, its history, sh!t happened.

that all is debatable, /I could say that if allies lunched offensive against Germany while all German forces were engaged in Poland, the war could be won, then and there! All that mucking about was just excuses for French belief in Magiont line and British consenting! What about treaty?What about Poland - screw them!

That is the bottom line!
By 9 September Polish forces were holding on all fronts and lunching major counter-offensive! (Army Poznan)

There was such an offensive, and Germany was beaten on 2 fronts. France was hors de combat however the USSR joined the allies. They liberated Poland too. The US was also involved, in exchange for help against Japan. We know how the story turns out and you know that the treaty was fulfilled.

Not in September 1939, that later victory by Britain, USA and Soviet has no meaning for Poland. She hasn't been liberated by Soviets but enslaved by them.

Only after 1989 Poland regained independence of sorts, consequences of 1939 are still very much alive.
Ironside   
24 Jul 2012
History / Did British public protest against the sell out of Poland to the Soviets? [286]

You keep claiming that but you also keep refusing support your claim. You keep on refusing to go into detail about the alleged aid it was within Britain's aid to give but was not given.

I don't have to support anything. Facts do the talking. Once we agree that there was Treaty signed, what to debate?
Maybe you are going to claim that they signed treaty aimed at Germany that didn't demanded military action from all those countries which signed it to help the one attacked by Germany?

Who, which country's government would agree to sign something like that?
Can you prove that Poland signed such treaty?
Do you need definition of "help" or what constitute "military action" ?
If there were no fully-fledged offensive by either French force or Britain navy and air force or both, then we cannot agree as to definitions of help and military action.

Those are clear per se - as to make a considerable impact on the enemy, not phony war but war.
Ironside   
24 Jul 2012
History / Did British public protest against the sell out of Poland to the Soviets? [286]

The UK declared a war on the Axis and fought it with tremendous loss of life. What more do you want?

Read my posts ~121 and 123!
What do you want?

here should be a bit more gratitude floating round this thread.

You are kidding, right?
You cannot eat a cake and have a cake at the same time.

You are claiming that Britain did not fulfil her treaty obligations

I'm not claiming anything, that is a fact, Britain and France didn't fulfilled their obligations. What I want? For you to stop deny it.

You cannot contest facts.
Once that fact is established we can debate reason or reasons that Britain and France didn't fulfil their treaty obligations.
Ironside   
24 Jul 2012
History / Did British public protest against the sell out of Poland to the Soviets? [286]

In September 1939?

If Britain did nothing to fulfil her treaty obligations in 1939, why is it impossible for you to go into detail about what aid it was within Britain's power to give but was not given?

How you can prove nothing? There is lack of anything and that is the proof in itself!
Ironside   
24 Jul 2012
History / Did British public protest against the sell out of Poland to the Soviets? [286]

No other country did more for Poalnd than Britain -

Name few!

Exactly.

Achievable? Like full scale attack in force on German installation and ports made by British Navy and Air force.I think that was achievable, not to mention French here.

What changed between June 1939 and September 1939?Nothing! If France and Britain have not been able to help Poland, why would they promise that they will?Was it lie? And if it wasn't a lie - what stopped them?

In my opinion that treaty was a gamble. They hoped that the threat of war with France and Britain will stop Hitler and at the same time prevent Poland from joying the axis alliance.

A brilliant plan - killing two birds with one stone, right?
What if Hitler would not be deterred ? Poland will pay the price!
Am I wrong?I Don't think so!
So, what to be grateful for?
Ironside   
24 Jul 2012
History / Did British public protest against the sell out of Poland to the Soviets? [286]

There were no British soldiers on germanys borders in september 1939,there were however over a million French soldiers on germanys borders at the time.
They did nothing.
By the time British ground forces had arrived on the continent ,in France,under French command,Poland had already fallen to the germans and Soviets.

Nobody is denying that the French are to blame but Britain also promised help. As to use their navy and air forces against Germany.
The point is you cannot say

Why should it? The British governments job was and is to look after the interests of Britain and the British people. Exactly the same for the Polish Government.
Grow up people,international diplomacy is an adult game not one for children into silly notions of honour.....what did *Polish Honour* achieve for Poland in the 20th century?

And then go and babble about -hey it not us it French!
That silly children games, be an adult and say - hey we screwed you because we calculated at the time that it would be advantageous for us to leave you high and dry.

(I would argue that France and Britain miscalculated that one, but never mind)
Yet, nobody says so - expect for Wroclaw Boy - because that would make you makes you looks bad?
So, maybe concept of honour is not so silly after all?
Ironside   
24 Jul 2012
History / Did British public protest against the sell out of Poland to the Soviets? [286]

Really?

Really! What troops, air forces and the navy movement occurred in September 1939? I mean British forces.
It is easy to prove really!

what I don't understand is why only anti-British.

It is no anti-British. It is assumption by some Brits that Britain was doing favours to Poland during WWII>
Also denial of the fact that France and Britain done nothing to fulfil their obligation in 1939.
French? Who cares about French? They are though about with contempt or not at all.

Let me ask you one more time, what/who did you mean by Untermensch?

As I said - up-tight pricks! At lest some:)
Ironside   
24 Jul 2012
History / Did British public protest against the sell out of Poland to the Soviets? [286]

Why should it? The British governments job was and is to look after the interests of Britain and the British people. Exactly the same for the Polish Government.
Grow up people,international diplomacy is an adult game not one for children into silly notions of honour.....what did *Polish Honour* achieve for Poland in the 20th century?

Ask sandancer!

Tell me why did the UK go to war against the Axis Powers?

Traditionally to keep the balance of power in Europe.

What about the Polish rubbish of Polish airmen winning the Battle of Britain

Well, they outweighed the scale a little in your favour. The battle was won by the skin of teeth.

Pope bringing down communism!

That for those who belief in divine intervention and power of prayer.
Ironside   
24 Jul 2012
History / The Untold Battle of Britain [205]

OH please they learned cooperation of attack on bomber formation form Poles. The only cowboy in Polish wing was Czech.
Ironside   
24 Jul 2012
History / Did British public protest against the sell out of Poland to the Soviets? [286]

1939-1945 we occupied the Germans time and stopped them from wiping out the Untermensch!

OH? And I was drinking tea armed in belief that you are clever enough not to bite it, little did I know.

Did you really? Prove it? How many British regular troops were fighting Germans on Polish soil?What took you so long to bring the fight to Germany?

Isn't it that a fact that you were late six years in delivering what you promised?
Meanwhile Germans killed whoever they wanted in Poland.Shouldn't all destructions and loss of life happening between September 1939 and the end of the war in Poland be your responsibility?

If that treaty would have been private contract you wouldn't stand the chance in the court of law.
Finally the pleasure you evidently feel using the word untermensch isn't a clear indication that you are racist in modern sense of the word. I would say that you are using that word to compensate your own numerous shortcomings.

Germans never really believed that Poles are unter-something they just were mad and vengeful at Poles for refusing their offer of alliance. Otherwise they wouldn't been kidnapping Polish kids to rise them as Germans.

To make it clear.
Britain never acted on behave of Poland. Never done any favours to Poland. Also Your suggestion that somehow Britain single-handedly won war with Germany is laughable at best.
Ironside   
23 Jul 2012
Love / Best way to find a Polish husband...ideas? [120]

I am surprised that so many people jumped in to give advice and so few commented on such a racist comment.

Using language like that puts you in the same

Ah that is nonsense, just take cold shower.
Ironside   
23 Jul 2012
History / Did British public protest against the sell out of Poland to the Soviets? [286]

I just do not see the point of arguing about it now in 2012 with people who are not interested in history.

sanddancer is posting here for sometime, and he is coming back for more, I'm just holding mirror in front of his beak.

i just think you are wasting your energy.

I'm done for a month :)
Ironside   
23 Jul 2012
History / Did British public protest against the sell out of Poland to the Soviets? [286]

Ironside, we have to move on!

Yes indeed, I just cannot stand stupidity.
Facts are facts, Poland and Poles suffered unimaginable atrocities during the war, they made countless noble sacrifice to be left for Soviets to digest. Poland still suffer consequences of WWII in a bad way.

And then along come some as hole with a **** for brains and disrespect all those people, or some part-time histrionic(sic!) buff and claims that British suffered accordingly. No they didn't, not generally. Somebody else state that Poles talk all the time about WWII, so do British, my granddad this or that, this town was bombed, there a hole in the ground were German bomber crashed. Fine, in Poland half the country was almost wiped out, do I talk about that all the time? No, almost not at all, only when I'm accosted by an ignorant snotty ****!

Show some respect if you want to be respected in return.
I'm the most reasonable man there is, only specific of PF brings the worst out of me:)
Ironside   
23 Jul 2012
History / Did British public protest against the sell out of Poland to the Soviets? [286]

Really... the Poles in the 'Battle of Britain' made up about 20% of the kills. Who made up the other 80%?

You are forgetting about veteran soldiers defending Britain against expected invasion, who formed I Corps.

Remember if the British hadn't have been so busy the germans would have had more time to complete it's untermensch policy!

Are you kidding me? Britain have been on defensive until 1943, their first success was in the Northern Africa where Polish Independent Carpathian Rifle Brigade were active since 1941. And Later in Italy where also Polish 2nd Corps landed.

Anyway Britain was heavily supported by the USA by the time.
My point is that all that mucking about didn't influence German policy in Poland.

As i said before the British public had more to worry about at the time then Poland, who to be honest hadn't done Britain any favours in the past. Fact!

It is not about favours it about promises, if you promise something and than you weasel your way out that promise the least honest and honourable thing to do, is to admit it.

Nobody would go about that if you could to just that,admit it, not ifs and buts.

So then answer this question why doesn't Poland spend a little bit more preparing it's defences for the next invasion? It's spending on defence is woeful!

Because Poland is a continental country without channel to hide behind it. Also Poland had only about 18 years to rebuild after the WWI and 120 years of partitions and lacked infrastructure and resources to build army stronger than Soviet Russia and Nazi Germany combined.

Yes, Poland in September 1939 had been invaded by Germany and Russia, the fact people like you tend to conveniently omit.
Poland against Soviets and Germany lasted longer than France and Britain combined in 1940 against only Germany.

it doesn't need to it'll hope for another round of help from the Imperialist British and the Americans.

The best policy for Poland would be to take Hitler's offer and join his axis alliance, not to believe in empty guarantees of some up-tight pricks without honour.
Ironside   
23 Jul 2012
History / Did British public protest against the sell out of Poland to the Soviets? [286]

But do remember that we all know you never will go into detail and that you know you cannot go into detail about it.

Not never but rarely. Especially when I debate you. Proven wrong you would just stop posting for a day or two and then revert to the argument already refuted.

I just cannot be bother.
Ironside   
23 Jul 2012
UK, Ireland / Websites for Poles to benefit from Britain! [210]

You country? Dude you got a big ego. I'm sure that you don't own few square foot in the country let alone all of it.

The fact that you were born there means nothing, cattle and other chattel also are born in the country but it never dream to make claims to her ownership.

Real owners of the country decided that Poles are entitled to those benefits.End of story.

By the way - I think that foreigners shouldn't be entitled to benefits. Only native parasites should be left alone to squabble over it. Nobody should be standing between you and your benefits.
Ironside   
23 Jul 2012
History / Did British public protest against the sell out of Poland to the Soviets? [286]

Britain promised to "at once give the Contracting Party engaged in hostilities all the support and assistance in its power." So what did Britain promise to give but did not give?

Like all the support and assistance in its power ?

Why did the British people need to protest?

Like Polish solders were the only allies they had during the Battle for Britain? Only allies in Force?
I guess bad memory is a blessing for self-esteem eh?>

In fact in History the Poles have fought against us on more then 1 occasion. I'm sure a fact that Churchill was fully aware of.

The thread is about British public not about Churchill. By the way Churchill have been fed BS by the British Intelligence infiltrated by Soviet agents.
Ironside   
23 Jul 2012
History / Did British public protest against the sell out of Poland to the Soviets? [286]

the issue of the things which Britain could have done to help Poland in September of 1939 but didn't do. But given the way that you have for a number of years avoided doing that, I'm pretty sure that you won't start to go into detail about what aid it was within Britain's power to give

I already answered you but don't let this fact get in the way of your fantasy word.
Britain shouldn't have promised something they were not able to fulfil!