PolishForums LIVE  /  Archives [3]    
   
Posts by Ironside  

Joined: 26 Feb 2009 / Male ♂
Warnings: 1 - A
Last Post: 26 Aug 2025
Threads: Total: 53 / In This Archive: 18
Posts: Total: 13690 / In This Archive: 5887
From: The Royal Palace of Warsaw
Speaks Polish?: Better than most

Displayed posts: 5905 / page 103 of 197
sort: Latest first   Oldest first   |
Ironside   
15 Aug 2012
Love / How many Polish girls are married to foreigners? / How many Polish boys to foreign girls? [104]

Like I wrote,

I think you are rather confused dude.
I reckon the ratio of females over males is higher in the Eastern Europe due to war losses. This is not true for western countries. So it may seems that girls from Poland are interested in foreigners very much, personally I doubt that.

Also, I doubt there is any statistic you ask for.
Ironside   
15 Aug 2012
News / 70% of Poles like Komorowski. Do you? [120]

Also that pathetic scene when PM and Presidents dance in front of cameras grovelling to half-wits and retards for their support. There must be a better system out there.

C Rise must have been laughing as well.
I think there should be either president or premier in Poland, two heads of state are redundant, costly and ineffective!

Funny though that people with limited capabilities can perceive only half of the story ie JK laughter !
To be honest he should have been crying witnessing Tusk embarrassing performance. I guess he wasn't sure how to react seeing a naked debasement of his opponent !
Ironside   
15 Aug 2012
History / Forced Polonisation campaign? [16]

Why do you say that?
It seems a fair reflection of the events to me.

Because minorities in Poland before the war had not impact at the fate of the country. All problems started after the war, I may add lost war!

Also the fact that some minorities behaved badly during the war had no influence on the fate of the country minorities or shape of the border. It was decision made by Stalin regardless of all internal pre-war scrabbles.

Stating that Poland's acts (expect for refusing German offer of alliance) before the war had any bearing on post -war settlement is false, untruth and stupid.

and why is this thing still occupying the center of Warszawa? Rather symbolic of PRL-bis, wouldn't you say?

Precisely because the present state it is PRL-bis not Poland!

Why do you say that?

I couldn't edit!
Because fate of Poland after war has not conception with minorities or anything else expect for the fact that Soviet Union overrun Poland and Stalin was making all decisions regarding Poland by himself and to suit himself.
Ironside   
14 Aug 2012
History / Forced Polonisation campaign? [16]

Tampering with one of the most intimate facets of human existence -- religiious faith

Russia had no problem with tampering with everything, all American analogies can be scraped. Russian Orthodox Church was a willing tool of anti-polish Tsarist policy during partition, working hand in hand with oppressive tyranny of Russian gov, supported by bayonet if needed.

Short lived attempt at restoration status quo before partitions wasn't and isn't a big problem.

Interbellum Poland was one. It just didn't work out very well as one (which is one reason for the post-war ethnic cleansing by, against and in favour of Poles).

What a stupid thing to say!
Ironside   
14 Aug 2012
History / Forced Polonisation campaign? [16]

You are supposed to be obsessed with Polish history, so you should know what I'm talking about.
Is that "obsession" exclusively limited to Jewish history in Poland?
Ironside   
14 Aug 2012
History / Forced Polonisation campaign? [16]

Anyone know how widespread that campaign was?

Not really widespread. In the late 30' government tried to undo years of partitions by removing more obvious symbols of Russian violence and occupation.It lasted for two, three years.
Ironside   
14 Aug 2012
News / 70% of Poles like Komorowski. Do you? [120]

btw Tusk's English was not spontanous i

It was absolutely unnecessary in this situation and was done only to stress that Tusk can speak English, whereas clearly he cannot. All this silly games just show what kind of people they are.

No wonder that LK laughed, yet what have media done about all that bundle- focused on LK laughing as there were something wrong with it!

He was right laughing only people like Tusk refuse to grasp it - prependers and poseurs!
He made a total ass and jerk out of himself just to score few point in polls!
Ironside   
13 Aug 2012
News / 70% of Poles like Komorowski. Do you? [120]

Nope he was a laughing stock.

Nope he wasn't !
I can keep doing it indefinitely!Would your rather read links, I have posted in this thread?
Ironside   
13 Aug 2012
Language / Have you ever heard 'destynacja'? [19]

That's OK. You just cannot talk facts, you want to talk propaganda - even in the subjects as neutral as a grammar.

What are you even talking about? That issue is not a grammatical issue.
It is about usage of the word in the Polish language, You posted link in which named use of the word "destination" in the Polish language - mannerism.

Mannerism - Exaggerated or affected style or habit, as in dress or speech
I call people who use that word by their name - poseurs!
Problem?
Everybody is entitled to his opinion, yet you cannot somehow grasp it.
You are unable to agree to disagree. Fine with I, but don't make it sound as if it was mine fault.
The fault is entirely yours, it must be karma, some people are always wrong.

I have been waiting for any sort of political declaration on your part - a program of some sort, maybe?

Are you sure that you are in the right thread?

So far this is an angry garbage.

Angry - no! I'm Sharing!

OK, funny little man.

Sorry I didn't mean to hurt your feeling! OK! I'm lying - I don't care one way or the other.

płetwy opadają! :-(

Hey sorry! I took you for a human being as for a maritime mammal you are doing great!
Ironside   
12 Aug 2012
Language / Have you ever heard 'destynacja'? [19]

Funny, coming from a man with the foulest mouth in this forum. :-)

OK I don't like you too. The only difference between us is that I can admit it openly and you are looking for some excuses and making bogus claims.

Oh, really?

Really!

All you can say is to follow J.Miodek

I contrary to you feel not need to "follow" and I can reach conclusion on my own. Anyway it seems to me that what Miodek really say is "since they are using it, let it be."

The bottom line is that you are entitled to your opinion and I'm entitled to mine.
For you such word indicate sophistication and education and for me insecure and insincere plebs with education but without real culture and cultivation but striving to appear as such - in fact a poseur.

Yes, the man is becoming more funny than ever before (not to mention he already became "sophisticated" in his own pecular way long time ago).

AH? Anther highbrow. If I'm so funny and so beneath you - what do you care? Especially the thread is only about usage of some odd word! As I said insecure people.

What is your cyðan Ziemko? To tell me that you onscunian me? I don't care, honest:)
Ironside   
12 Aug 2012
Language / Have you ever heard 'destynacja'? [19]

Although this opinion may sound convincing, it is not true. The word "destynacja" has been in use for some years now

So what it has been used for years, it doesn't make it right.

I've never heard it in the lips of someone "whose language is poor and intertwined with vulgarisms and swearwords

I would say that particular issue is debatable. What for me is poor and intertwined with vulgarisms and swearwords for you may sound normal or even sophisticated.

It's a perfectly normal word. Can't say it is used widely, but certainly denotes a bit of sophistication when applied.

I'm sure it does for someone with the word "spoko" in his profile.

The word "destynacja"

The word was used in the Old Polish and its meaning and usage was different than its English transcription into Polish today.

So any connotation between the Old Polish and the modern Polish language is only and purely accidental.
Anybody using that word in the Polish language today must remember it make him/her sounds funny, pompous and windy.
Ironside   
12 Aug 2012
News / 70% of Poles like Komorowski. Do you? [120]

In Poland educated Poles spent quite a lot of time with their hand over their faces.

I would say, all that educations was wasted on them. Maybe if they had to pay for their education instead of getting it for free they would learn something.

but in Europe diplomats simply couldn't do business with him

You mean he didn't use a perfect opportunity to be quiet and be a yes-man for Europe diplomats? Well, he was naive, he thought that he represented a country and interests of a nation.

He was a national embarrassment.

What nation are you taking about?Soviet Poland? Yes, that nation can be easily embarrassed.
You see he was a confused fellow, he believed that he represents the Polish Nation.

"Georgia has lost its biggest friend in the international society. Poland and Europe have lost a great politician."
Ironside   
12 Aug 2012
Language / Have you ever heard 'destynacja'? [19]

Never heard it and I don't like it.
I think that it is used by the same people whose everyday language is poor, intertwined with vulgarism and swearwords, In fact those who do not know proper Polish language. When they try to sound classy and learned they come up with such unfortunate and redundant vocabulary. Alas they are surrounded by unfortunates not unlike themselves and their vocabularian fallacy is met more often than not by uncritical acceptance.
Ironside   
12 Aug 2012
News / 70% of Poles like Komorowski. Do you? [120]

s that in contrast to his predecessor he is a healing

The fact is that he support present regime, more he is a part of it make his presidency so much easer than it would be otherwise. Also doing nothing is not healing, he is only lulling to sleep people by being boring nobody.Also he keeps likes of you in semi-comatose state - wake up - the real issue are not going away and talking nonsense will not induce them to disappear.

If the hunt is for culling

Who cares that he is hunting as long as he is not hunting people?
Ironside   
11 Aug 2012
News / Poland's Economy Is Booming! The EU's Success Story? [711]

And Poles earned 20$ monthly for producing that stuff.

Wow!? You mean Poland's economy is booming because you can earn 200$ a week for spreading crap on line? How that develop infrastructure in Poland? How that make officially open motorway closed after few day again to finish unfinished motorway after lying to people triumphantly about its completion as yet another proof of professionalism and efficiency of the present gov.

When the truth is that are professional liars and that is the only thing they are good at.
Accordingly Poland's economy is not booming and if you were a face and name instead of silly moniker you wouldn't dare to lie so outrageously. Because you would have to eat your hat when(not if)a **** hits the fan!

but needless to say thanks to Westerners and their money

Oh yes thats the fact and not wishful thinking! Not!
You better present some prove of your claim, because otherwise your talk can be dismissed as yet another self justification of people who are driven by self interest and only their guilt and complexes induce them to make such laughable claims.

have a good one
Ironside   
9 Aug 2012
Love / Any Polish Muslim girls living in Poland? [103]

My wife doesn't cover her head and she constantly has these retards staring at her as if she were from the moon.

When in Saudi Arabia she should cover her head.

wearing hijab is just as wearing a tie...

No it is not, not in a few countries. Good for them!
Although wearing hijab or such in western countries should be forbidden!
Ironside   
30 Jul 2012
History / Did British public protest against the sell out of Poland to the Soviets? [286]

go into detail about what Britain could have done but did not do.

I don't need to go into details bout what Britain could have done but didn't, I just say that she never indented to do more than token skirmishes!

I am not required to prove that Britain could have done more

Sorry! It should read - Can you prove that Britain couldn't have done more than she did?

Really? Got any sources at all to back that particular claim

I'm sure there are sources to prove it. For now there indirect indications and of curse the way they behaved during September 1939.

Also the fact that I'm not in the possession of detailed agreement between military staff do not mean that such detailed agreements didn't exist.

All your agreement here pertain Military Defence pact. What sense would be for Poland to engage into agreement which do not promise military offensive in the hour of need?
Ironside   
30 Jul 2012
History / Did British public protest against the sell out of Poland to the Soviets? [286]

As well as you are unable to prove that Britain could have done more.
Anyway it is immaterial as we both know that Britain never intended nor planed an offensive( air, navy or both) against Germany in September 1939. Also they were well aware that neither France planed to fulfil her obligations.

That so called alliance was sham.
The real aim of the Pact was to ensure that Poland will not join Hitler's camp.
Ironside   
30 Jul 2012
History / Did British public protest against the sell out of Poland to the Soviets? [286]

Why not quote me to show that you are not lying?

I couldn't be bother as you would sourly accused me of lying anyway. You should change your moniker to Old Jack.
You say that Britain done all she could. I say that she didn't and anyway shouldn't promising anything to Poland just to her fight Germany.

Its wasn't on!
Ironside   
30 Jul 2012
Life / Free Poland Health Care - Paying minimal to no Zus [105]

That is completely different to what Poles get in the UK - they just get a GP and treatment if necessary with no nonsense, or at least they did last time I was there.

The rules around who GPs should treat for free are fairly flexible. A GP can choose to register overseas visitors as temporary residents, or, if they are in the UK for longer than three months, accept them onto their lists.

Also all the EU citizens residing legally in the UK longer than six months are entitled to visit GP for free. To visit GP for free can also those who work or study in the county.

Technically this could apply to failed asylum seekers or immigrants, although this is left down to the decision of the individual GP.
In addition, asylum seekers or refugees who have been given leave to remain in the UK, or are awaiting results of an application to remain in the country, are eligible for free GP treatment.

Nothing to do with Poles, just the UK system.

So now that we've established that the vast majority of people in the USA don't pay more for health insurance than people in Poland, fill us in on how we "can't compare" the US system with the Polish system. Because now we have facts to work with.

If you want to have proper healthcare in Poland that suits you and you are taken properly care off, you need to pay as well. On the top of your "free entitlement", health insurance is included in taxes, it means that it pay from the budged. Most of the monies are eaten by bureaucrats.
Ironside   
29 Jul 2012
History / Did British public protest against the sell out of Poland to the Soviets? [286]

All your rubbish about verbal promises is just rubbish until you can show us what promises were supposedly made!

Well, you are talking rubbish, According to you the aid promised to Poland were left to the discretion of Allies. They could just forward a good wishes and that would fulfilled their obligations to Poland according to you.
Ironside   
29 Jul 2012
History / Did British public protest against the sell out of Poland to the Soviets? [286]

I already have the text of the treaty (and have linked to it here). No surprise to see you don't have it, and this haven't read what you claim Britain broke.

I have already posted from the text of the treaty:

The methods of applying the undertakings of mutual assistance provided for by the present Agreement are established between the competent naval, military and air authorities of the Contracting Parties.

Those details you are asking for, just find adequate documents. I know what they promised, you find it out.

I already have the text of the treaty

Do you? Good for you, why don't you knock yourself out with it?
Not only you are ignoring my questions and my posts which you refuse to answer but also you are doggedly post the same and then some more of the same in hope of wearing down your opponent.

In face of that tactic I must refuse to enter into any debate with you on the subject until you answer my question(post136).
I will also hold you in contempt.

Ironside, you are forgetting Harry's and English double standards here

Not I'm not article of the treaty says -

The methods of applying the undertakings of mutual assistance provided for by the present Agreement are established between the competent naval, military and air authorities of the Contracting Parties

There must be somewhere written records, testimony of witness and all that. However I didn't study those and I'm not in possession of those.

There is at least common sense argument that Polish government wouldn't have given free hand to France and Britain as to the manner and the way of delivering promised help. Details of those would be needed to construct consistency plans for military forces. In fact that would need timetable, and detail of the promised support.Also it is highly unlikely that Polish government would sign a treaty that didn't promised full military support in case of German invasion.

In fact what Harry is doing is using the letter of the treaty to discredit any claims that military help were promised. Those promises very well could be verbal as the spirit of the signed treaty judged by common sense and circumstances couldn't be anything less than the Polish-British Common Defence Pact and that means military action in defence of Poland.

Harry's way of reasoning (if you may call it) seems to be coming form studying Talmud. Where each latter and each word need to be examined fuller whereas European attitude is to pay closer attention to the spirit of document than to the exact wording.

Ironside, could you tell me if Harry has replied to Ozi Dan's post dated 4th October 2011?

No, I far as I'm aware he didn't.

Kondizor, my *point* was that most of these half educated fools think Churchill was to blame for Britain not invading Germany within 20 minutes of war being declared,

edit unnecessary comment removed
Ironside   
28 Jul 2012
History / Did British public protest against the sell out of Poland to the Soviets? [286]

But of course you refuse to go into detail about how Britain failed to fulfil her obligations. Or to quote from the treaty (because doing that would show you very simply are not telling the truth about what it says).

What details? You do not expect details but text of treaty which says expressis verbis what were obligation of Britain. I don't have those.
Ironside   
28 Jul 2012
History / Did British public protest against the sell out of Poland to the Soviets? [286]

Again, do you have no shame? Poland invaded there ,not Britain.

What are talking about> I said that Czechoslovakia is off topic here,

Ironside,this is why I don't quote anything,I've studied enough about it.People here suggest that the west deliberately left Poland to the dogs

Depends on what we period we are talking about. If we are talking about 1939 it is looks like diplomatic bluff aimed to stop Germany.
I mean if those promises of military help wasn't aimed at preventing Poland from reaching an accommodation with Germany then I ask - what they were there for?

Consider French and British governments were well aware that in war against Germany Poland alone has no chance of winning.
On the other hand there is Polish government who knows sort of the same, at the same time Polish government signed treaty with France and Britain.

A very realistic treaty. I mean very logical and with certainty of victory for Polish-French-British coalition over Germany.
That those countries were interested in stopping Germany there is no doubt about it. That why all that stuff is mind boggling, why they have done what they have done - from a logical point of view it makes no sense.

As you says there is human factor and I blame Polish government for not realizing that the human factor at play will prevail. They had all tools needed to do just that, they failed and some part of the blame must lie with them.

The beginning of the WWII as presented in popular historiography and in myths is far from the truth. Germany invaded Poland - that the stuff from newspapers of the days, Britain in defence of Poland declared war on Germany - that another headline.

Most people think about 1939 as a prelude to war. Germany wanted to take over the world and they were devouring countries one by one and Poland's conflict with Germany was somehow inevitable.

In that light most pass over that period and goes to the interesting stuff. When you consider that Poland in fact had a choice and promises of Britain and France was a push which made Poland to go to war with Germany - that adds different dimension to the equation!

There is no doubt in my mind that Britain didn't fulfil their obligations. I entered this debate being sick of Harry's take on the issue not to score.

As for British public protesting - I would think that in 1939 said public has even less inclination to protest over some abstract issues than in 2012 and that says all!. Nor would I expect any public to voice their opinion about foreign policy of their state on the street.

This is quite clearly a lie or said with hindsight. offical restrictions on which targets the RAF could attack on the out break of war precluded ANY attacks on private business and civilian targets. So, try again,maybe actually credit your sources too.

So there is issue whether my sources are wrong or those promises were made, that would mean they were promising anything in the knowledge that all is a sham anyway.

Polish government would expect solid military aid. By military aid I mean invasion on Germany by French army and Britain navy and air forces attack on Germany.

Do you think that in facing a war with Germany Polish government would say to Britain - hey you come to my aid in whatever manner and way you deem right!

That is nonsense, they would need to get assurances, promises and timetable to buy it.
They were naive but not stupid.