PolishForums LIVE  /  Archives [3]    
   
Archives - 2010-2019 / History  % width 11

WWII in Europe could be also understand as Civil War of Slavic world?


Crow  154 | 9602  
23 Aug 2010 /  #1
many things were already said about WWI. Great war was analyzed from different angles. Let us now try to think about whole thing from entirely new perspective that is until now, unfortunately, absolutely forgotten.

We can try to think about WWII taking in consideration well known historical facts about origin of European population. What i want to tell you, to remind you, population of Eastern Germany was Slavic not so deep in past. Those are Slavs that are relatively recently germanized. Simplistically speaking in case with this subject, same or quite similar what we can say about Eastern Germany we can say for Austria, Hungary, Baltic states, Switzerland, Belgian, etc, etc.

But, just remember, we are still on the field of proven scientific facts, we are just in the middle ages. There are numerous data that could easily confirm process of germanization (assimilation) in mentioned countries (European areas) that (BDW), isn`t finished even today.

So we don`t even need to go deeper in past in order to conclude how WWII was traumatic experience for Slavic civilization and resulted in real self-destruction of Slavs.

How did it come to this? Well, divisions and internal antagonisms inside of Slavic world are `famous`. Slavs are biggest losers because of Christian divisions on Catholicism, Protestantism and Orthodoxy. Christian divisions were regularly reason for self-destruction of Slavs. If we then add fact about germanized Slavs and those who are loyal satellites of foreign elites and centers of powers we really have to accept that WWII, speaking of Europe, was on the first place Slavic Civil War, absolute Slavic self-destruction.

Shell i remind you of total WWI casualties? Taking in consideration all sides involved in conflict in Europe, erased population was almost completely of Slavic origin.

Think about this
MareGaea  29 | 2751  
23 Aug 2010 /  #2
population of Eastern Germany was Slavic not so deep in past

Only the Sorbian population (app 150.000) are Slavic, the rest is Germanic. Saxons, for example, are not Slavic. This is within the current borders of Germany.

Shell i remind you of total WWI casualties? Taking in consideration all sides involved in conflict in Europe, erased population was almost completely of Slavic origin.

About half of the casualties of WW2 were of Slavic descent (20 mln Russians, 3 mln Poles, 1 mln Yugoslavs and others), the rest was of non-Slavic descent.

But you're right in one point: the conflict in Eastern Europe was the heart of the conflict, this was race against race, one totalitarian régime against another. Has of course to do with the racial politics of Hilter cs.

>^..^<

M-G (busy)
OP Crow  154 | 9602  
23 Aug 2010 /  #3
Admin, o almighty!

this wasn`t for off-topic. This is about Poles. Very
MareGaea  29 | 2751  
23 Aug 2010 /  #4
You claim all your topics are about Poles, yet they somehow manage to end up being about Serbs.

>^..^<

M-G (still busy)
OP Crow  154 | 9602  
23 Aug 2010 /  #5
yet they somehow manage to end up being about Serbs.

see.... Germanics would tell you that Serbs started WWI and that Poles started WWII

So, even by Germanic standards, this thread is about Poles
MareGaea  29 | 2751  
23 Aug 2010 /  #6
I was born and raised in a Germanic country and I am half Germanic myself. There was never any doubt in this Germanic country, nor in any other Germanic country, about who started WW2. As for WW1 - the Austrians fired the first shots yes, on 29th of July 1914 on Belgrade, but the Balkans wouldn't have been such a powder keg be it not for the preparing work of the Serbs.

>^..^<

M-G (busy busy busy)
king polkakamon  - | 542  
23 Aug 2010 /  #7
WWII in Europe could be also understand as Civil War of Slavic world?

It was not civil war between Slavs it was Slavs vs Germanics that's why it had all this cruelty.
At the end the Slavs prevailed but let the Germanics live while the opposite is doubtful if it would happen.
Jimmu  2 | 156  
15 Nov 2011 /  #8
It was not civil war between Slavs it was Slavs vs Germanics

Funny, I seem to remember hearing about some Asians, Africans, Australians, and Americans being involved.
FlaglessPole  4 | 649  
15 Nov 2011 /  #9
well in the case you were disinformed by the Islamic Leauge/Nato/EU propganda, they were all Serbs and that's a fact!

ooops wrong nick again
sascha  1 | 824  
15 Nov 2011 /  #10
Funny, I seem to remember hearing about some Asians, Africans, Australians, and Americans being involved.

through ww2 they found out that sth like europe exists. ignorants, like nowadays. didnt much evolve.

but the Balkans wouldn't have been such a powder keg be it not for the preparing work of the Serbs.

sorry mg, but you are an utterly piece of liar.
OP Crow  154 | 9602  
24 Oct 2019 /  #11
Fortunately, no matter all historical challenges, Slavic world is much stronger then Anglos, Frankos and Germanics altogether. Now, in situation when Slavs works with Anglos and Jews, its behind humiliation what can befall Frankos and Germanics.

Plus, Pope Francis loves us, no matter that Patriarch of Constantinople don`t likes us.

Archives - 2010-2019 / History / WWII in Europe could be also understand as Civil War of Slavic world?Archived