Pro_Svet_Spb 1 | 41
13 Jun 2011 / #1
All that happens in relations between our states was a consequence of the accepted decisions of our heads of the states, and they not always are will of the people...
Here is some facts:
On March, 16th 1933 At the World conference on disarmament the British prime minister has suggested to allow Germany to double number of German army and on as much to reduce number of the French army.
1933 - Refusal of Poland to take part in the offered USSR "East pact". Poland and Germany have suggested the USSR to conclude such pact without France and Czechoslovakia but on such conditions the USSR has refused
January 1934 - Nonaggression pact between Germany and Poland.
1936 Introduction by Germany of armies in the Rhine area. Poland has supported this step. In the answer France has declared that has no more obligations to Warsaw. Great Britain has taken of a neutral position. Later Poland also has supported Anschluss Austria.
On October, 2nd
1938 Polish armies occupied Czech Teshin and territory adjoining to him . Thus, Poland together with Hitler's Germany participated in occupation and a partition of Czechoslovakia and input of the Soviet armies to Poland was not unique and not the first similar action of that time.
1939 British government has suggested Soviet Union to give unilateral obligations to neighboring countries. Obligations to the USSR it was not provided.
1940*) the French government under the agreement with the English government has offered the general M.Gamelenu and admiral F. Darlanu to develop the plan "Direct intrusion to caucasus". The Deputy The General staff of the Air Forces of France a gene. Berjoro: "from r thow Near East approach to Baku(USSR) … will begin Then it will develop in northern direction towards to the armies coming from Scandinavia and Finland to Moscow. [P.Stehlin. Temoignage pour l'Ristoire. Paris, 1964, p.215]
*) Certainly, the most part of these plans it has been caused by the Soviet-Finnish war. But it is interesting to compare them to statements during time of "strange war" (after an attack of Germany to Poland)
1942 London Polish government refuses to send the armies formed in territory of the USSR, on front and has deduced them to the Near East (it was just during Stalingrad fight).
It is obvious that the facts and the statements, similar the aforesaid, always try to trace foreign policy departments of all countries. And, most likely, appreciably then all it was known to a management of the USSR. Therefore there is nothing surprising in the followed list towards Germany. And to accuse Russia of it probably nevertheless hypocrisy. Or, the modern language, "display of double standards".
If have something to add from your side you are most welcome...
P.S. From my own: i like people from around the world, just government makes them look bad.
With Kind Regards,
From Russia.
Here is some facts:
On March, 16th 1933 At the World conference on disarmament the British prime minister has suggested to allow Germany to double number of German army and on as much to reduce number of the French army.
1933 - Refusal of Poland to take part in the offered USSR "East pact". Poland and Germany have suggested the USSR to conclude such pact without France and Czechoslovakia but on such conditions the USSR has refused
January 1934 - Nonaggression pact between Germany and Poland.
1936 Introduction by Germany of armies in the Rhine area. Poland has supported this step. In the answer France has declared that has no more obligations to Warsaw. Great Britain has taken of a neutral position. Later Poland also has supported Anschluss Austria.
On October, 2nd
1938 Polish armies occupied Czech Teshin and territory adjoining to him . Thus, Poland together with Hitler's Germany participated in occupation and a partition of Czechoslovakia and input of the Soviet armies to Poland was not unique and not the first similar action of that time.
1939 British government has suggested Soviet Union to give unilateral obligations to neighboring countries. Obligations to the USSR it was not provided.
1940*) the French government under the agreement with the English government has offered the general M.Gamelenu and admiral F. Darlanu to develop the plan "Direct intrusion to caucasus". The Deputy The General staff of the Air Forces of France a gene. Berjoro: "from r thow Near East approach to Baku(USSR) … will begin Then it will develop in northern direction towards to the armies coming from Scandinavia and Finland to Moscow. [P.Stehlin. Temoignage pour l'Ristoire. Paris, 1964, p.215]
*) Certainly, the most part of these plans it has been caused by the Soviet-Finnish war. But it is interesting to compare them to statements during time of "strange war" (after an attack of Germany to Poland)
1942 London Polish government refuses to send the armies formed in territory of the USSR, on front and has deduced them to the Near East (it was just during Stalingrad fight).
It is obvious that the facts and the statements, similar the aforesaid, always try to trace foreign policy departments of all countries. And, most likely, appreciably then all it was known to a management of the USSR. Therefore there is nothing surprising in the followed list towards Germany. And to accuse Russia of it probably nevertheless hypocrisy. Or, the modern language, "display of double standards".
If have something to add from your side you are most welcome...
P.S. From my own: i like people from around the world, just government makes them look bad.
With Kind Regards,
From Russia.