Wroclaw Boy
1 Oct 2009 / #1
Who's bored of the traditional WWII threads? We did that, you did this, if it wasnt for us etc etc..
I thought id try this one out. Lets get started with Britian without any research two weapons spring to mind.
Spitfire:
Probably saved Britian from nazi invasion, a superb invention and most importantly better than its adversary the Me 109. Faster, more manouverable.
Gammon grenade:
A heavy grenade with enough power to knock the tracks off a tank, in Stephen E Ambrose's book Band of Brothers it was the grenade of choice for the 101st of the 506.
Undoubtably Germany will top the table for superior weapons and if we get that far i look forward to firther discussion.
In my opinion one of the worst weapons was the US designed and built Sherman tank. The Gerries referred to them as - Tommy cookers or something. So many design faults: high turret, poor armour, no deflective capabilities and the worst of all it ran on petrol. How we won the war with those as our leading tank surely comes down to numbers and tank crews only.
I thought id try this one out. Lets get started with Britian without any research two weapons spring to mind.
Spitfire:
Probably saved Britian from nazi invasion, a superb invention and most importantly better than its adversary the Me 109. Faster, more manouverable.
Gammon grenade:
A heavy grenade with enough power to knock the tracks off a tank, in Stephen E Ambrose's book Band of Brothers it was the grenade of choice for the 101st of the 506.
Undoubtably Germany will top the table for superior weapons and if we get that far i look forward to firther discussion.
In my opinion one of the worst weapons was the US designed and built Sherman tank. The Gerries referred to them as - Tommy cookers or something. So many design faults: high turret, poor armour, no deflective capabilities and the worst of all it ran on petrol. How we won the war with those as our leading tank surely comes down to numbers and tank crews only.