Don't you think they'd rather 6 million people weren't murdered because they were of that community and that any property restitution is simply recovering their own property?
That doesn't answer the question. The question is, how are some Jewish people not profiting from the Holocaust Industry? They are, full stop. A logical question is then, why you went to the effort of trying to distract from this? What are you trying to avoid?
Someone who has read the book and can see what errant nonsense his spurious claims are.
Such as?
He'd actually lost a fortune through successful libel actions against him.
So? What was the evidence provided? Who was the judge? Who was the plaintiff? What were the circumstances surrounding the events? If it was libel for speaking out against the Holocaust Industry then it would seem as though he chose the path with the most resistence and stuck with it. It kinda contradicts what you were tyring to suggest.
Basically a conspiracy theorist, and as a person who describes himself as "an old-fashioned communist" one with unsavoury political views.
Based on?
You're just calling the guy names without actually providing a detailed basis for your accusations. I could write "you're just a greedy pig who wants to continue profiting off the sacrifice of millions and this guy bugs you because he's calling you out on it" without any proof whatsoever- it's hardly valid discussion. We can just call eachother names and call others names if what they say or write doesn't support what we think or want to think- is that where you'd like this to go?
I can post reviews by people too:
Mahatma Gandhi once wrote: “Massacre of innocent people is a serious matter. It is not a thing to be easily forgotten. It is our duty to cherish their memory.” Finkelstein’s book reads like an indictment against Israel fit for the world court and his quest for uncovering the truth is a fitting tribute to the martyrs of Gaza. by Ziyaad Lunat
Reading Finkelstein cautions Jews and others to be careful with memory. In certain contexts, memory can be subversive; in others, memory can shield the status quo. When individuals and communities become vested with memory as a form of identity and specialness, then other suffering threatens to displace the centrality of our experience. by Marc H. Ellis
What specifically is your beef with what he's stated? Where do you think he hasn't been honest in his observations and experiences? What do you think his goal is?