Angela Merkel is partially Polish. Her family name could be Kaźmierczak

Putin is far from being a commie. If anything he's more of a right wing natiinalist. Even China is only commie in name and politics but not so much economics. In fact China is among the easiest and quickest places to set up a business.

Please stop talking about things you have no clue about. It is fine if you don't know anything about how the GDR was run, but making painfully obvious wrong comparisons is just embarassing for other readers who do know what they are talking about.

China plans to give out points for obedience and loyal (to the party) behaviour (Social Credit System). The more points you get the more privileges (like traveling, access to the good stuff etc.) you get.

But if you prefer to do your own thing, having your own opinion, act "individualistic" etc., the less points you get....that can make your life very uncomfortable.

Hey, but at least you can set up a business there so easy and quick, YAY!


I doubt Putin fits fully either into the left or right wing drawer. He has developed his very own style named aptly "Putinism". Its center is a cult of personality unseen since Mao or Stalin. Here lays also his future. It will die with him!

Sometimes in world history such people have to die first before long needed reforms can be made....

Communists always give points for obedience. Like we all know that already. They also offer a front to be consumed. The front, perhaps a glowing city with modern things and the lucky few. Meanwhile at the rear it's a different story. The Polish forum is one of those few places in the world whom you will never sell communism to. 100% guaranteed!😎

No clue about socialism and communism huh? Dude I still have ration cards and passport from the PRL days... poland is still trying to undo the commie era to this day. But as in Germany's merkel, former commie officials and agents are protected by the establishment and eu... atleast finally poles have said enough is enough and are using the fractures and problems all over the eu as an opportunity to get rid of the socialist eurocrat judges.

The eu even gave up on forcing Poland to take in migrants with the recent negotiations- a huge victory for all the parties and people who feel europe is for europeans and the 75% of poles who dont want migrants from me and Africa.

And it's a well known fact that many former GDR and stasi officials hold high positions in merkels government. Only difference is with Merkel and her fellow socialists, she's appropriating from her own citizens and redistributing to muslim invaders. Afterall the 1500 eu a month migrants receive has to come from somewhere.


It'll likely be that way with merkel... maybe not at/after her death but were already seeing a huge rift in her own government. People want to undo all the damage her 'we can do this' policies. If schegen is eliminated it'll be because of merkels terrible decisions back in 2015 which set off a domino effect lasting to today


No different than Macron erdogan dutuerte etc. If it ain't broke don't fix it. And putin has made Russia great again - hence why over 80% of Russians support him and that's a western stat. Thanks to Putin's ballsiness and support for mother Russia, christianity, traditional family values etc the Russian population will demand the same of their next leader, which will likely be chosen by putin anyway, and he's not going to pick some beta cuck like trudaeu or Macron thats for sure

Stop lying. This is not true at all.

But merkel wants a federal Europe with non elected leaders Just like China, so you don't see the link with GDR, I do it stands out like a sore thumb

A federal Europe would certainly not have unelected leaders. Even in its' current form, the EU de facto government (the EU commission) is confirmed by the EU parliament which in return is directedly elected by the European people.

That's just not true. Germany had something Poland never had, a whole agency/office to take care of all Stasi files (Stasi records agency /Gauck Behörde). Not only had they the full knowledge about every Stasi employee, also every citizen could take a look into it's own file the Stasi hat written about them (I did it myself).

Everything the Stasi ever did was there for the people to see, that means all information about it's employees and collaborateurs too. Every german citizen knew who was in there and did what.

In consequence there where no Stasi employees in sensitive high positions. And if, then only as long as it was found out, then it was over...there was no hiding!

One of his most famous bosses, Joachim Gauck, later became a very popular president of Germany.

IMHO Poland could have used their own agency too...


Where did you get that from? A link?

A "federal Europe" means actually more leaders! :) Every region get's one, contrary to a centralistic Europe where everything is ruled by one center only.

Federalism means generally much more influence and possibilities and freedoms for the regions...not less! And more democratic security too. As it could be possible that this one central position could be taken over by one misfit, it is near impossible to rule all regions against their wills...it's just to many!

But maybe I'm biased, coming from a federal Germany. France for example is such a central state, where only Paris counts and nothing else. A federal EU with powerful regions would be a good thing actually!

That's a quote from a propaganda talking points manual.

Federalism, like communism, was a great idea on paper, right along with state rights. That was then. Now, the feds are telling local schools what's for lunch and that boys who think they are girls can take showers with the girls, erections notwithstanding.

No, you'd find those sentences in any dictionary.


Nobody cares that gay boys shower with men, and lesbians with women, so what is the problem here?

Only a guy who never had a teenage daughter would say something as dumb.

Federalism was imposed on western Germany by the victorious allies, namely the US, to avoid the legislative disaster that made the powergrab by Adolf Hitler possible.

A federal system, with extensive political and economical independence and souvereignity for the several counties/Länder/regions, would had made that take-over from one party leader in centralized Berlin impossible.

To the contrary in communist eastern Germany had been the same central state implemented by the russian occupants as in all servant states of equally centralized Soviet Russia, which made it possible to rule over millions of people with one lonely iron fist.

Federalism served Germany very well! It made it to one very stable and successful country, even or because it made the whole political decision finding process very slow and cumbersome. After all all strong regional leaders had to find compromises, nobody could over rule them all!

Communism needs a strong central state to function. But federalism is the choice for those who prefer individualism, difference and independence.

....and to paralyze Germany from the waist down - including the testicular area - into submission to the hordes of Muslim invaders.

I wil take China and Russia for their racial sustainability any day.

BTW, are Germans allowed to say ethnic sustainability or is it a federal thought crime?

Yeah...that's why Germany is in such a political crisis right now. With big, powerful federal state Bavaria uprising against Merkel ruled Berlin and threatening the whole continuation of the actual german government over the refugee-problem.


Do you have an idea how many different people, races, ethnies belong to China and Russia? :)

I tell you:

China: 56

Russia: 185

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ethnic_groups_in_China_and_Taiwan
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ethnic_groups_in_Russia


What would be the german translation for that

You cite two countries as examples that a) have dozens of ethnies and b) had/have racial uprisings in parts of their country (Chechnya, Uighurs) et al.

I wrote "racial sustainability", not racial homogeneity. Clear now?

Plus, China and Russia do not have no-go zones. If some group decided to set up a no-go zone, instead of showing how culturally sensitive China is, Chinese police would make it a point to show how totally insensitive to idiocies like that they are and go there to prove it. These are the rare moments when I like commies.

BTW, Koresh tried to tell the feds that his compound of religious freaks in Waco was a no-go zone. Well, the feds didn't like the idea. Good for the feds.

No, not really...


You like their government style, you like their actions...You like commies, period! ;)

I will not risk getting another "O" just because you don't know the difference between sustainability and homogeneity. Google both and you will know.

Just to help with the English language, I wrote "These are the rare moments when I like commies" which is not the same as "You like their government style, you like their actions...You like commies, period!" Too hard to understand?

BTW, what's that "period!" supposed to mean? End of discussion? If so, who the hell are you to tell me what I can or cannot post from now on?

Well...to know if a German get's tared and feathered when using some words I need the exact translation, you know! :)

[quote=Rich Mazur]"You like their government style, you like their actions...You like commies, period!" /quote]
If it walks like a duck...quaks like a duck...

You wish for a strong man to "clean up" the country, with any opposition being muzzled, aren't you? Where do you think lays the difference?

When did you become my press secretary? I am plenty capable of expressing myself without any assistance. But thanks for trying to use this very well known technique of paraphrasing the opponent. In the US, it is known as a strawman argument.

Please explain "racial sustainability" to me, would you?

It means that a country will last forever in its current racial or ethnic composition and the way of life.

Racially or ethnically unsustainable: South Africa and the US, for example. That is why we desperately need that wall before we become Brazil. The whites in SA are facing genocide.

Countries which are ethnically sustainable: Korea and Japan, for example. Which means that Japan, just like Korea, with its zero immigration policy will be Japan one thousand years from now. The US will not be white in less than 50. Neither will France be French in a century. Even if numerically the locals will remain a majority, they will be forced to adjust their life style to avoid being raped, mugged, or forced to run for their lives.

Russia and China have plenty of no go-zones, particulary for foreigners. Parriculary for foreign football fans. And the Russian rareny does anything against it. Not to mention their high murder rate.

No, they don't.

There are no no-go zones the Russian or the Chinese police where told by their Merkels to stay away from for fear of upsetting the foreign scum occupying said no-go zones. BIG DIFFERENCE!

But you know that such a status is not the normal state of mankind, don't you? Mankinds default state has one of always wandering and always mixing. That's how we evolved and developed. Or else we would still be the same group of walking apes from that little valley in Africa....

To fight the wandering and mixing will be like the war against windmills...or even worse, you could end up with some unnatural human zoo like North Korea!

Yes they do. Anyone who ever travelled to Russia and stayed their for a time can tell you this. This is really just a stupid argument. Are perceptions really that warped that some people believe that Russia is in any way safer than Germany? Really, the country that is run by oligarchs and KGB agents?

Amazing how much propaganda can warp facts and perceptions.

You are deflecting.

Evolution is not the same as invasion. Evolutions are slow, non-violent, and with the consent of those who evolve. Kind of like growing up.

Today, WE and the US are being INVADED by the hordes that would never be invited for its merits, as there are none.

When Poland was invaded by the Germans, was this evolution and development? You could argue that with their arrival, the average IQ in Poland went up. Just don't do it in a Warsaw bar.

The German invasion of Poland was actually easier to resolve than the Islamic invasion of Germany. The Russians simply killed them in large numbers and those who didn't die immediately in Poland ran for their lives back home. There is no way Germany can ever get rid of their Muslims because Germany has no balls to do it. To make matters unsustainable, said Muslims will outmultiply the German natives in short order because they are permanently on welfare with all that free time left to f*** and reproduce. Plus, "it's their culture".

I am so happy that the meaning of racially unsustainable is now clear. Scary but clear.

quote=Tacitus]Yes they do. Anyone who ever travelled to Russia and stayed their for a time can tell you this.[/quote]
You mean to tell me that there are places where the Russian cops are (1) afraid to go or (2) told by the Russian government not to go because this will upset the foreign and illegal scum?

Please don't answer with another strawman or a deflection, as it is getting late where I am.

Several parts of Moscow, basically all of Chechnya, the list goes on.

list25.com/the-25-most-dangerous-cities-on-earth

Russia under Putin is in no way an example to follow for the West, and is lagging behind in any possible indicator. And even the biggest army of internet trolls will not change this perception.

I mean seriously. Russia has ten times more murders per Citizen than Germany and you fantasize here about crime statistics.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate

List of what? List of "places where the Russian cops are (1) afraid to go or (2) told by the Russian government not to go because this will upset the foreign and illegal scum?"

That kind of list? Or a list that has nothing to do with subject of the Western style no-go zones?