Looking for details on hunting in the vovoidship of Warmia-Mazurskie.

My god - the values of some people!

Next we will have priests telling us it's acceptable to bugger little boys!

not a bad pleace. many german tourists. mainly old folks. slower, fatter so easier to get.

Without bragging, I'm very good with guns when it comes to target shooting, I have been taught by my dad for years and we still have this old rifle of his. It never crossed my mind to shoot the animals... When it comes to hunting for food, that's a different story but killing for pleasure is pathetic!

Bzibzioh

a few thousand years ago people educated themselves by looking at a cow's belly.

now, even if someone is lazy to go to a library, they don't have to look at cows. They can look at some websites which discuss differences between herbivores and carnivores.

stevepavlina.com/blog/2005/09/are-humans-carnivores-or-herbivores-2/

blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=47066186&blo gId=356438791

jamieoliver.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=40762

If someone has a better idea how to regulate wild animal's populations at levels compatible with human activity - let me know. I'm not interested in someone's naive and uneducated views so that discussion is over for me.

Birth control pills and neutering males have been found to work well.

Anyway, why are you interested in population control? You supposedly hunt only for food.


There's an original way of saying that you know you've lost the argument.

You are joking, right? What about a small detail as the cost of such huge operation and logistic? Plus I'm sure there will be some another flamboyant defenders of such 'cruelty'.


Except I didn't. You all came back with insults as response but no counterarguments.

You were the first one to come with an insult, remember.

As for regulating population numbers, I think humans have the greatest problem with this.

the only species breeding excessively in this country are cats. Still wouldn't want to drown cats in the river. Don't quote statistics, please.

Who said we should have a monopoly for life? We have made a waste dump of the whole globe. I haven't noticed any species doing this except humans. A deer destroyed a patch of someone's field? Let's kill it. children can watch deer in the zoo. We are imperialists in nature and we will pay a price for this eventually.

No counterarguments? She still thinks it is better to look at a cow's belly to decide if humans are carnivores or herbivores. Who wants to continue the discussion? I really don't.

No, I didn't. I expressed my unfavorable opinion.


THAT is an insult.


In another words: you have no clue.


Wrong again.


Watched Al Gore's 'documentary' one too many times?


As much as I'd love to engage in the leftist propaganda I would leave you to play by yourself.


Honey, go and check your teeth in the mirror, please. And start with independent thinking for ones. It could be good for you. Good day!

That was in random, but yeh its an insult hey ive got another one. Hypothetically speaking: Im gonna section off a couple of hectares of my land, drug you and put you in it. Then im gonna take my sniper rifle sit in my tower over looking the area where you are and shoot you, hopefully with a one shot kill.

and you are full of sh.t too.


and you're another ignorant dolt. none said they get off on killing.. some of you just made that mental leap. unfortunately it seems you guys are c lueless.


grow some cajones.. you may not be a men.. hmm


lol.. check again hon.. our k9's aren't for tearing of cabbage, eh?


so, who cut your balls off? hahaha


no but deer and other animals when overcrowding an area have just as much neg. impact as humans. look into it sometime.. seem many of you are freaking clueless.

Thanks for your input prick123!

Im a real man

Don't know much about the countryside do you.

you're welcome. :D


keep telling yourself that.. it may seem real eventually. :D :D


your response doesn't seem to go along with his statements.. more proof positive that i and he nailed your lack of understanding.

conservationmagazine.org/articles/v8n4/wildlife-contraception/

Read and learn.

lol.. you just proved bizb right.. try again. :D :D :D

She said that there is no other way to control animal populations. I named two. She asked if I was joking. I pointed out that such question proves she knows bugger all about the countryside. But do feel free to keep posting rubbish, it's crystal clear that you can't post substance.

good luck putting rubbers on every deer, elephant, squirrel, rabbit, etc..

he/she was right.. and you seem to just be ignorant about it.. your solutions are not really viable.. think about it some.. then maybe i won't give you hell about your dumb posts.

Perhaps you might like to read the article. Either that or just keep highlighting your ignorance.


You might consider them not to be viable but experts at places like the USDA’s National Wildlife Research Center completely disagree with you. But then they know something about the countryside and wildlife: you clearly do not.

yes, usda knows a lot about wasting money, for sure.. you are right about that.. but in the USA, hunters are a major part of wildlife population control. this method has more advantages then what usda proposes..

as to my rubber comment.. think about it.. don't be a fool..

You clearly do not know what they are proposing.


As I said: you do not know what they are proposing. They are proposing to shoot female animals with darts containing contraceptives: the same type of substance as is found in birth control pills. Condoms are not going to be used. Contraceptive darts have been used successfully on elephants for several years. You're just too stupid to have heard of it. To you the only thing to do with a gun and an animal is to kill the animal.

Eh, bunch of vegans, huh? FACT: Human brain would not have developed to what it is today without the amino acids from animal proteins. As always on PFs, here we have the limeys singing their tune for the downtrodden. What a joke. Fu.ck off with that sanctimony for once and go have a slice of steak and kidney pie.

i'm not proposing.. that is the fact of life here.. DNR via the hunters' quotas control most of wildlife populations here.


you're a dolt.. read my post again.. then think about it before you spew stupid crap again.. not everything is literal in this world.. crack open an english comp book. dumbarse.

Quite right, you are not proposing anything. You are saying "Let's blow their brains out! It's the only humane thing to do."


Perhaps you might like to get a grade one book yourself. Pay particular attention to the part about capital letters and how they are used to start sentences. Moron.

i'm not even saying that.. like i already said a few times.. hunting as wildlife control is the fact on the ground here.. you can be ignorant of that fact just like you are about everything else.. have fun being the dolt you are.. wank3r.

I agree that it is the fact on the ground. I just don't agree that it is the only practical way to manage animal populations. That is because I know something about the countryside while you clearly either do not know anything or just think that animals exist for you to kill them for your entertainment.

have you actually ever been out in the countryside? seriously man..

besides, find where i said that is the only way? however, hunting is the main way, yes.

Yes thanks, all of the first 18 years of my life.


How about the place where you said "he/she was right.. and you seem to just be ignorant about it.. your solutions are not really viable.."?

yup, he/she is right and yes, injections are not really viable.. there are like tens of thousands of deer just in my state.. how are you going to inject even half of them? we got other things to be spending money on.. hunters do a great job keeping wildlife in check.. without them, all you PITA's would sh.t a brick and whine some more.