Return PolishForums LIVE
  PolishForums Archive :
Posts by Sokrates  

Joined: 19 Jan 2009 / Male ♂
Last Post: 5 Oct 2011
Threads: Total: 8 / In This Archive: 1
Posts: Total: 3,345 / In This Archive: 1,407
From: Poland
Speaks Polish?: Yes
Interests: Many and varied.

Displayed posts: 1408 / page 4 of 47
sort: Latest first   Oldest first   |
Sokrates   
2 Nov 2009
News / If Poland is attacked by Russia will N.A.T.O help defend Poland or not? [171]

Eben Belarus is capable of attacking and defeating Poland.

I dont know what would happen first, Belarussian army running out of fuel, out of ammo or getting owned by Poles, possibly all three.

At a whooping 1/3rd of Ukrainian GDP (Ukrainians are estimated to have 400-500 tanks operational) Belarussian army is running around on vodka and foul language.

It's probably a question of technical culture and safety procedures

But the risk of losing several voivodships is still there, imagine losing Lower Silesia or Greater/Lesser Poland, it'd fvck up our economy back to stoneage.

the acquiring of nuclear weapons
would give our army enough deterrent factor to assure the safety of our country in
the foreseeable future.

Well improving our army will also give us a deterrent factor without the added risk of becoming a shiny glass desert.
Sokrates   
2 Nov 2009
News / If Poland is attacked by Russia will N.A.T.O help defend Poland or not? [171]

I guess it's a question of priorities.

Those priorities are already chosen, we're already paying for stuff like F-16s and Patria AMVs, if we chose to finance nukes now, apart from the political chaos that would start we'd lose a LOT of money that we dont really have and when you have nukes they need to be maintained and housed, warhead carriers are not cheap either.

One other thing that i'm not happy at all about would be a nuclear reactor, Ukraine lost a huge patch of its country, i wouldnt like any of our major cities to start glowing.

We're still going to have to go nuclear as far as energy but there's safer reactors that dont allow for enriching Uranium.
Sokrates   
2 Nov 2009
News / If Poland is attacked by Russia will N.A.T.O help defend Poland or not? [171]

Come on, if Pakistan with GDP of $167.6 billion can afford their own nukes
and Israel with GDP of $201.4 billion can afford them, then Poland with $667.9
billion GDP (2008 est.) can find some money as well if need be.

We need to replace or purchase more of:

Frigates.
Corvettes.
85% of main battle tanks.
Infantry fighting vehicles.
Self propelled artillery.
Self propelled rocket artillery.
Personal weapons.
45% of fighter jets.
Attack helicopters.
Transport helicopters.
4x4 utility transport.
Combat vests.
Self propelled AA systems.
Tank shells.
UAVs.
Modern fighter jets.
More AT modern AT weapons.

Thats only selected examples, theres dozens more.

We're basically transitioning from a soviet era army to a modern military and while we're centuries ahead any other country in ex Soviet Europe we're still going to be paying through the nose for about 20 years before we get a truly modern army, where will you get additional money for those 20-30 nukes and assorted stuff?

Come on, if Pakistan with GDP of $167.6 billion can afford their own nukes

Except that the level of life of an average Pakistani citizen is what it is and their army is not exactly top notch.

As for Israel its being pumped with US help and offsets.
[quote=Bratwurst Boy]One example our future unit of german/polish soldiers will need to guard against enemies:

news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/8337735.stm
rulen.com/kkk/kkkflag2.jpg

Join european task force in Africa (couldnt help it) :))
Sokrates   
2 Nov 2009
News / If Poland is attacked by Russia will N.A.T.O help defend Poland or not? [171]

Russia is...how do I say it..inoccupyable?

Ha! We've been there twice in Moscow no less! But yeah currently they're just too big.

Well...in case of a real danger scientists would work double time believe me. We would have something like that sooner than you think!

Its not a question of working double time but available technologies, you can work triple time and you wont create a plasma rifle anytime soon.

But also then this soldier will probably part of a rather smallish, highly specialized unit send all over the world to protect our resources from some un-named empire or rival union!
That will be our future wars...

The immidiate future of this project is the new general standard for rich countries like Germany and elite frontline units for poorer countries like Poland.

Not to forget the costs involved for developing nuclear war heads and the technology to enrich uranium to weapons grade.

That wouldnt be that expensive, we're not Iran we've got all neccesary technologies here and as for resources we could buy them from China or India (if we got really redneck about getting nukes) but its still loads of money that'd have to come from somewhere.

All right, all right, Mr Penny-Pincher - let get ourselves even 20 or 30 of them
and the risk (more like certainty ;-))

Where will you get money for them though? (i'm disregarding political implications).

Yeah, I know, a few nations tried that before... ;)

And we did it! True in the end they kicked us out but only because we (our king) lost interest, we even made our kings royal brat a Tzar and had their Tzar become a monk:)))
Sokrates   
2 Nov 2009
News / If Poland is attacked by Russia will N.A.T.O help defend Poland or not? [171]

(no matter if it would be 50 or 100 Polish war heads).

Woah there champ, 100 warhead and lets say 40 missilies to carry them, thats a LOT of money and we aint exactly USA when it comes to $.

The future soldier!

This article basically tells you that maybe probably some unspecified time in the future some of the options could possible be made, maybe.

We were talking about the theoretical chance of Russia attacking Poland. In that case NATO would join the fight,

And if NATO which is to say Germany joins with its full weight Russia gets a boot up their face by combined Polish and German armies and the war ends in Belarus with some sort of armistice.

the Russians they would have to occupy the country for a while. Something along the lines of the Iraq war, I suppose.

Iraq has a population of 31 milion and is France sized, Russia has 140 milion and is continent sized.
Sokrates   
2 Nov 2009
News / If Poland is attacked by Russia will N.A.T.O help defend Poland or not? [171]

By NATO, including Poland.

And why in heavens name would NATO want to occupy Russia?

Another 50 imaginary Polish war heads on top won't make a difference IMHO.

Amen, Russia might or might not attack Poland someday in the future but nukes? Unless Harry becomes next Russian president Poland doesnt get nuked by anyone.
Sokrates   
2 Nov 2009
News / If Poland is attacked by Russia will N.A.T.O help defend Poland or not? [171]

But that doesn't mean that future wars will a bit different than what we know...

Ah but what future? We're now 64 years after WW2 and our weapons are basically refinements of WW2 concepts, there's no jetpack infantry and Germany untill very recently used what was a copy of their WW2 light machinegun (we still got it on our Leo 2s).

we just haven't the people to do it the 'ol way as future wars won't be local conflicts but where unions are pitched against each other for whatever reasons.

But even today wars aint fought with masses, the price of equipment dictates that armies be smaller and that negates any advantage a country like China would have militarily.

What would that change? Russia would wipe out Poland completely, and in return Poland would destroy a handful of Russian cities and military installations.

Which is what Russia boils down to, there's a difference between geographic Russia and demographic Russia.

I mean that they are running the risk to lose a large war and get occupied afterwards.

By Poland?
Sokrates   
2 Nov 2009
News / If Poland is attacked by Russia will N.A.T.O help defend Poland or not? [171]

Nope...Germany outsmarted their enemies all the time during the last wars.

Ugh... we could get into who invented what but we've been there a dozen times, suffice to say Germany was among the leaders but not really the leader.

we can do it again!

Not really, the concept of future warrior got way ahead of its time, eventually late commers like Poland and Germany just dropped the concepts of power armor and other SF stuff and focused on what can be done with our science and cost effective.

But right now I think Europe misses the real reason....we are cutting defenses and research left and right!

Well there's no real enemies, central and western Europe aint going to war and Russia isnt exactly a military giant, at the same time we're in a financial mess.

I'm not a pacifist but there's no point in having more then we have already.

We can't throw european soldiers at them like they could throw Chinese at us....

Why? It all boils down to how many troops you can arm and train, you can have 50 milion reservists but if their military training amounts to point rifle and squeeze trigger then you're going to massacre them at a rate no country can afford.

We need to use and to develop tactics and sophisticated weapon systems to have a chance.
If we want to fight future wars like WWII we will end up like France who still fighted WWI in 1940!

The difference between WW2 and now is that the world had completely new tools (airforce, tanks, self propelled arty, mechanized units) and you were the only ones who developed them to their full potential, the weapons we have today are largely developments of WW2 concepts so of course some things changed but the war is not revolutionary different.

You still need air dominance, you still need tanks on open plains, we use artillery a bit differently because its more precise but you still need to shell the f*ck out of anything before you attack it.
Sokrates   
2 Nov 2009
News / If Poland is attacked by Russia will N.A.T.O help defend Poland or not? [171]

No, thats just the beginning of new developments, new inventions...part of the process.

USA which has a lot more brains and money to buy even more brains stopped at around the same stage as you did, i suspect what we're looking at now is mostly it.

Future wars won't be slugfests between millions of marching armies anymore...the West is brainier than that!

Dont expect a revolution here either, we're basically using concepts from 50 years ago, some evolved and the equipment got expensive and armies consequently got smaller but the way we fight today is not that different from 1944-45.

The downside is they will need more than your usual half illiterate school drop out to actually use all that new high tech....

Well we've got our own future warrior thing on the roll.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Projekt_TYTAN

Creating new generation of battle uniforms
Creating new generation of tactical equipment
Developing new electronics and optics technologies
Developing new communication systems
Modernisation of equipment and adjusting it to current standards
Researching new generation balistic shields

Main Weapon
Personal Computer ( GPS system, Maps, Nightvision, Friend or Foe System, communications system, Weapon's crosshair system)
Lithium-ion battery
Helmet with display, headphones and microphone
Modular body armor
Sokrates   
2 Nov 2009
News / If Poland is attacked by Russia will N.A.T.O help defend Poland or not? [171]

You basically armed a soldier with a gun based on an American 70s design, slapped him in some better protection and improved communication, its a solid improvement but not really a revolution.

Thats about the size of one Russian tank division....they have about 70 divisions....thats just with tanks...lots of others with armoured stuff....

When discussing Russian military a reality check is needed, they're aiming to have 3000 tanks left in line so we can guess thats about the number they have active anyway, in case of war with Poland they still have to have tanks on the border with China, in Georgia, Chechenya and some reserves, so how many tanks would be used? 1500-2000? Poland would face 2-1 odds at most.
Sokrates   
2 Nov 2009
News / If Poland is attacked by Russia will N.A.T.O help defend Poland or not? [171]

Territorial defence doesn't really need tanks and airplanes.

They do if you want them to fight in a regular conflict.

We simply gotta
have enough of these to arm couple of million men.

Well we dont.

I would be truly gobsmacked if what you're saying would turn out to be accurate.

You shouldnt, thats a good strong force if it manages to get mobilised, by comparison Russia is unlikely to field more then 300.000 battle worthy units, and thats being extremely optimistic, Germany can probably arm even less soldiers then we do (though their equipment is light years ahead).

What's the point of having 3 million trained reservists if you don't even have enough
infrantry weapons to equip them with?

Replacements, also in communist era we had enough equipment to arm over a milion men (though whether that army was better then the current one is arguable).

lmao

They're one of the most expensive modernisation blocks out there and outperform every European fighter jet currently in service (including the Eurofighter) though Typhoons will get superior with the later production batches, its still going to be one of the best fighter jets in Europe.

The problem with you and most people out of the topic is that you dont realise a jet can be modernized to match or outperform newer designs by principle of just how bloody awesome and prone to modifications its basic design is.

For example F-16 is faster then the Eurofighter.
Sokrates   
2 Nov 2009
Love / Sending flowers to my Polish boyfriend [73]

Not quite.

No Shelly, women who buy flowers need to be shot as an example and warning.

but if someone wants to do it, why not.

I'd feel castrated if i got any, seriously its wrong.
Sokrates   
2 Nov 2009
News / If Poland is attacked by Russia will N.A.T.O help defend Poland or not? [171]

I can hardly believe that the stockpile is so ridiculously low.

Actually its not ridiculously low, 230.000 troops is quite a large force and its head and shoulders above its Russian counterparts, if mobilisation would be managed in time we'd have a good shot at succesfull defence against both Russia and Belarus (provided we dont get nuked).

Maybe that's the number
of rifles for the current army disposal (that would make sense - about 2.5 rifle a soldier,
in case of malfunctions, wearing down etc. etc.)

Oh the rifles are the least of our problems.

but certainly not the war stockpile!

Well for example we have 970 tanks and no further tanks in stockpile, around 110 combat planes and no further planes in reserve.

Same goes for self propelled artillery, our strategic stockpile consists mostly of towed artillery, AA assets, a small number of older armored vehicles, machineguns, rifles and RPGs so the troops would be mostly used as reach echelon, low profile protection and infantry bolstering mechanized formations.

As for links there's no links out there, all i know are guesstimates from Niezależne Forum o Wojsku but these guys know their stuff so i'm willing to bet on their opinions.

Indeed :-) Bring it on pesky ruskies

Gay parade?

But the F-16 is already outdated right now...hmpf...

Actually right now our F-16s are the best fighters in Europe.
Sokrates   
2 Nov 2009
News / If Poland is attacked by Russia will N.A.T.O help defend Poland or not? [171]

Won't that number have declined, Torq?

Poland can arm approximately 230.000 troops.

Where did you get that info, Sokrates? Poland has approximately 3 million trained
reservists

And approximately a quarter of a milion combat rifles of all types (AKMS, Beryl, Miniberyl etc).

What are you going to arm the remaining 2.725.000 with? Every country has a strategic reserve in case of war which allows a number of troops to be outfitted, and even then only the professional 100k large core force would be armed with up to date equipment, the reserve would have gear from cold war era stockpiles.

enough weapons to arm them in case of war (I wasn't talking about
the main army only but also about the territorial defence, reserve units etc.)

What weapons? To arm 3 milion men you would need additional trucks, APCs, tanks etc.

We dont have enough combat rifles to arm even 20% of that number.
Sokrates   
2 Nov 2009
News / If Poland is attacked by Russia will N.A.T.O help defend Poland or not? [171]

Interesting twist. If they didn't do something about Poland, would they intervene when Germany is rolled over.

Without a moments notice, Germany is crucial to France and UK having their beer in peace, Poland not really.

This situation is fundamentally different from 1914 or 1939!

In part yes but now Russia is slowly becoming the devil, we're unable to integrate Russia into anything because for all intents and purposes its a completely different planet and because they're not a part of anything their old schizophrenical idea of besieged fortress Russia is getting bigger.

And why all of a sudden are Germany Poland's best friend and England the b*tch...Answers on a post card please :D

Its all business Shelly, Germany is directly threatened by being next in line while UK is separated from the entire mess by France, the ocean and a sense of humor.
Sokrates   
2 Nov 2009
News / If Poland is attacked by Russia will N.A.T.O help defend Poland or not? [171]

Sorry is there some big plan by Russia to invade Poland that we havent heard about? And why all of a sudden are Germany Poland's best friend and England the b*tch...Answers on a post card please :D

Nah we're playing the old Polish game of when the Russians invade, there's going to be discussions like that even when Jesus crushes Russia under his left nut and there's no more Russians.
Sokrates   
2 Nov 2009
News / If Poland is attacked by Russia will N.A.T.O help defend Poland or not? [171]

"...subjugating only Poland" and then what? Another russian empire along the lines of the cold war?
Been there done that, no thanks!

Thats the problem with these threads, its not a dry case of Putin waking up and deciding that Polish people are just damn fugly and have to go, it depends on whether or not Europe see's whats cooking.

Historically only Poland was aware of whats Russia about, in 1920 Russians made no secret that they're aiming to take Berlin, Paris, Madrit and London after they take Warsaw and where were the British and French reinforcements?

Western Europe has a long and proud tradition of being blind and stupid when it comes to Russia so if the West decided they can ditch Poland without loss of profit they just might.

I can see it before my eyes...All countries around Germany are safely tucked under their nuclear umbrellas but only little, poor Germany is left out shivering in the cold!

You've got the most powerfull conventional army in Europe and who's going to nuke you?

Wildrover is correct "that IS what nato is all about" Where as you are quoting what nato used to be.

Nope sorry, Poland was admitted to NATO mainly with US support as a "F*CK YOU!" towards Russia rather then a strategic element.

In case of war, Poland can call up to arms over 3 million reservists

In case of war Poland can arm approximately 230.000 men with a body of 100.000 professional soldiers active or drawn from reserve.

Bollocks, war was declared two days later.

And the French army advanced a whooping 5 miles before stopping for a year stopped dead by the vicious German trees and roadside fences!

No the West did not help Poland and yes the treaties that fortified that help were much more specific then the NATO ones.
Sokrates   
2 Nov 2009
News / If Poland is attacked by Russia will N.A.T.O help defend Poland or not? [171]

thats what nato is all about

Wrong, originally NATO was about defending the West, Russia was preparing to invade and take over all of Europe and thats what NATO was about, if Russian goals would be transparent enough and included subjugating only Poland then Western help is questionable at best.

Now if Russian goals would potentially include going to Berlin then yes whole of Europe would go for it, including a possible nuclear exchange.

Poland is in NATO so of course NATO would back Poland.

Its not as simple as that, Europe has proven its a b*tch when it comes to particular interests, the agreements of 1939 were much more tangible then those of NATO and the West still failed to help Poland.
Sokrates   
2 Nov 2009
News / If Poland is attacked by Russia will N.A.T.O help defend Poland or not? [171]

If Poland will be attacked by Russia will N.A.T.O help defend Poland or just look the other way?

Unlikely, Germany might help Poland since if Russia is attacking Poland that would be an indicator of international order truly collapsing but UK and France wont do much.

Germany on the other hand might prefer the fighting to be happening in Poland rather then in their own backyard so they might actually send some very substantial help but that also depends on whether Russia breaks their trading ties with Europe or not and what the Russian goals would be.

Do you think they are suicidal?

You need to rephrase this, do you think France and UK would engage in a nukefest over Poland?
Sokrates   
2 Nov 2009
News / Poland is the most friendly neighbor of Ukraine and Russia - Ukrainian poll ... [132]

I haven't so far been able to find any mention the Russians simulated tactical nuking of Poland during the excercise

There was none, they were having an excersize on how to invade Poland (Poland was dubbed as an agressor) tests of nuclear bombers and launches of missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads but no actual simulations of nuking.

Well, that's a far cry from excercising nuclear attacks on a NATO member...

Meh this is just a propaganda show coupled with actual combat testing of what junk they still have, no one in Poland cares that much and rightly so.

Great! Then you have some and France has some and GB has some...only poor little Germany has nothing! NO FAIR!!! *wails*

Its not 100% certain that you dont have them and you can develop them in approx half a year (by comparison Poland would require about 2 years).
Sokrates   
2 Nov 2009
News / Poland is the most friendly neighbor of Ukraine and Russia - Ukrainian poll ... [132]

That's crass...if it were true! Is this true??? What are the polish papers writing about it???

Its true, they carried out excersizes in Kaliningrad together with Belarus, including an invasion on the Polish coast, but as long as Russia has the military spending it does the only countries its invading are Georgia and other pocket states.
Sokrates   
2 Nov 2009
News / JEW YOUTH SHOULD CLEAN UP THEIR ACT IN POLAND [420]

of the incident concerning the Jewish kids in PL rest on "hearsay" as I have trouble believing that he was actually participating in one of those trips.

I was but my personal experience is completely irrelevant just like yours, what matters is that i have posted quite a lot of links so no its not heresay, racism is norm for Jewish kids in Poland.

But Sokrates is anti-semitic and a borderline fascist

He's also a vampire.

True, Sokrates brought in the Israeli professor

I can bring more, its not like Israel is completely devoid of decent people and there's enough prominent Israelis who're obviously pissed at their own country completely butchering the Jewish-Polish relations, they're of course in minority but there's quite a few of them.
Sokrates   
2 Nov 2009
News / JEW YOUTH SHOULD CLEAN UP THEIR ACT IN POLAND [420]

There is largescale indifference to the Jews now,

Not true, we're actively hunting Jews, just last week i've been hunting Rabbis, they were grazing on a slope peacefully and then *BAM* i shot one!

Now i got a stuffed rabbi head over my chimney!

Residual hatred will remain but it isn't so noticeable.

Oh come on Sean most of us never saw a Jew in our lives (which is why i keep a stuffed rabbi).

Would you want to live next door to this guy?

Jonni i'm sorry i try and try but you sir are a focking little idiot, how about you have a nice cup of shut the f*ck up you little imp?

You know what a discussion is you chimpansee? You come here and i come here and we exchange points of view backed by facts (unless you're Maregea and you have no facts to back you up) you do not come to a forum to smear people just like that because you dont like what they're saying.

Joe supplied a thesis, a fully provable one because Nuremberg was indeed run by people affiliated to American Jews or being Jewish directly so either provide a counter argument or get the f*ck out you little monkey, i'm tired of reading your input amounting to "UR RACIST!!!!!!1"

Bloody retard.
Sokrates   
2 Nov 2009
Love / Sending flowers to my Polish boyfriend [73]

My Polish boyfriend of 7 months is in spain working att he moment.i ammissing himso i have sent him flowers.is this cool with polish guys? we are both romantic

Flowers? To a man? Thats focked up! Send him a watch with a romantic engraving or something, dont treat him like he's some kind of a fag.

not sure if I should admit this but my man likes getting cuddly toys :) does that make him less of a man??

Yes it does make him less of a man, no wonder the West is so f*cked up when women forget how to wear skirts and men forget how to wear balls.

Or not the done thing in Poland?

If you want to freak him out go right ahead, when my gf missed me she sent me a tie with mooses screwing each other and the other time a nice watch with a "come home quick, i love you" engraved.

Whats with you, are you so focked up that you see nothing wrong with sending men flowers? I really hope thats just forum baiting, otherwise you and your partners need to be put down with extreme prejudice for promoting things against nature.
Sokrates   
2 Nov 2009
History / Marek Edelman (1922 - 2009) [14]

Viva la resistance :-))

Luckily he failed at his attempt at censorship, awesome as he was he was fairly misguided.

I completely agree that RM is an unpleasant little station but closing it down would be utter fascism.

Sjam

Dont worry about Sjam, they're (he and Harry) our own A-Team (as in anti-Polish) :)))

The guy repeatedly accused Poles of working with Nazi Germans in WW2.
Sokrates   
2 Nov 2009
News / JEW YOUTH SHOULD CLEAN UP THEIR ACT IN POLAND [420]

And this ain't demented rhetoric?

No? Jews murdered innocent Poles serving the Soviets, they were Jewish and they were criminal so i see nothing wrong in calling them Jewish criminals.

OK. So maybe Pilsudski wasn't a wonderful guy. I don't really know who the hell he was and I don't care.

Yet you comment on him? Good job.

You're a bitter, hateful person

I wrote once that i hate Israel for what they're doing to Palestinians but in truth i dont think there's ever been anyone or anything i truly hated, i'm definitely bitter about the false relations between Jews and Poles where Jews show as in the worst possible light and at the same time deny any of their crimes towards Poles.

Would you like if Nazis accused Jews of being murderers of Germans? The primary difference between Jews in Eastern Poland and German Nazis was effectivness and scope, both Jews and Germans murdered Poles for the same racial reasons.

"THE JEWS".

Oh if you read some politics thread you'll notice i'm dumping quite a lot on my own govt or people, criticism goes where its due but this thread is about Jews and Poles, not about home cooking or how to score on the first date, i'm simply posting on topic.

Note the disparity of positions, Maregea says "Jedwabne was a Polish crime on Jews" and i admit, i say "Jews murdered and betrayed Poles in the East" and you scream "RACIST!!!."

This kind of hysteria would get you what you want on an American forum where Jews and Israel can do no wrong but we're among thinking people here so empty demagogy will get you nowhere.
Sokrates   
2 Nov 2009
History / Marek Edelman (1922 - 2009) [14]

Actually he understood quite well.

Viva la resistance (Palestinian one) :)

On topic, Edelman was awesome.
Sokrates   
2 Nov 2009
News / JEW YOUTH SHOULD CLEAN UP THEIR ACT IN POLAND [420]

who was apparently a wonderful guy.

Because he was with a Jewess, if you're not loving Jew, if you're pointing out their racist policies and outright lies you are:

demented

And that is why there cannot be any compromise with the Jews, the descendants of Jewish criminals who participated in the murder of Poles will always use hysterical rhetoric claiming people who bring up Jewish crimes are demented anti-semites.

Your people Yehundi, and you are just too immersed in your own racism and prejudice to talk with.