Return PolishForums LIVE
  PolishForums Archive :
Posts by Bylany1  

Joined: 24 Mar 2008 / Male ♂
Last Post: 13 Apr 2008
Threads: -
Posts: Total: 2 / In This Archive: 2
From: Corinth, Texas, USA
Speaks Polish?: No, but Czech
Interests: archaeology, history

Displayed posts: 2
sort: Latest first   Oldest first
Bylany1   
13 Apr 2008
History / Ancient Polish History thread [180]

Dear Sir,

I suspect that by the time we reach a time we can speak of Slavs in the strict sense (maybe in the Bronze Age), the Slavs actually inhabit the Lusatian Culture zone in broad terms, actually a bit north of Danubia, corresponding to E. Germany, Poland and the northern rim of Bohemia, Moravia, and Slovakia.

BMW Albert
Bylany1   
24 Mar 2008
History / Ancient Polish History thread [180]

Dear Sir,

I think that Biskupin, along with other Lusatian lake-forts in Znin region (e.g. Sobiejuchy), continues into Hallstatt D, after Bukowski to Ostoja-Zagorski. I remember that we found quite a lot of Hallstatt D material with the destruction of the parenthetical site some years ago.

BMW Albert

Dear Sirs,

I have made several pollen studies for my U. Durham Ph.D. in the Czech Republic and surrounding regions (including at the Neolthic site at Bylany and my main site at Vransky potok [Crow Creek!] in Bohemia). It seems universal (cf. Petr Pokorny and Vojen Lozek) that the major human impacts first begin in the Late (Urnfield) Bronze Age (e.g. Lusatian and Knoviz Cultures) in Central Europe (and somewhat earlier in the Balkans into the NW Carpathian Basin with Madarovce and Vetrov Cultures). The environmental data indicate the first establishment of major agriculture populations (sufficient to promote major deforestation) in Central Europe after 1500 BC (after 2000 BDC in Balkans north of Greece). Settlement data also point to major population increase at this time. It is perhaps worth noting then that demographic pre-conditions for the emergence of stable language families might also emerge at this time. Note also a certain geographic continuity which may be seen between in th extent Lusatian, Przeworsk (with some La Tene and Scythian penetrations prior to) and Pragus Typus (accepted Early Slav) pottery cultures which also correlate with Slavic place-names from East Germany to North Moravia. Some Baltic peoples may also be included in the above groupings (on the Prussian side). I suspect that one can really start speaking of distinctive proto-Balto-Slavs (becomming more distinctive from each other through time) after this threshold at about 3500 years ago (there may be glotto-chronology also to support this).