News /
Do you think that Polish catholics resent the new German Pope? [108]
This is age of kings and they were the masters. Of course they could not afford to waste talents of educated clergy
Kings were not masters, at least not always... You have the wrong image of a king. Even a king had to make alliances and he could not always afford to alienate the church. However this doesn't matter because it doesn't change the fact that the church did not accept sepration of church and state eagerly, it was more like becaue they had no choice.
Creationism according to RCC doesn't reject evolution. Here is stance of the Polish bishops
Well according to RCC, however the reality is quite differant. Creationalism is primarily used to be an alternative to the theory of evolution. Creationalism is used so we reject evolution. If the church had it's choice they would not admit to evolution however kind of difficult with so much evidance.
Big Bang theory is not based on evidence,
wrong..........
No such evidence exist, provide one if you can...
Well for one, depending on the forms of creationisms because there are several. One form believes in the exact creation as described in Genesis. LOL First off carbon dating tells us the earth is billions of years old not 10,000(give or take) as Genesis tells us.
Without writing a book about all the evidance the one above should suffice.
There is a logical hole here. You write about innocent child, a human. If so, like every innocent human being this child have some fundamental rights, for example a right to life. You cannot punish one person for wrong-doings of others. If you deny such child right to life, this will backfire sooner or later because precedent exist and other groups might be targeted later. Biologically there is no basic difference between unborn children. If you divide them on some groups where one are allowed to be born while others not then this is your irrational (because emotional) decision not a scientific fact.
I know where your heading with this.... Good point.... Yes I adovate that the unborn child has rights. However in case of rape the sin of abortion rests with only the father who committed the rape and not with the innocent mother(who had no choice to being raped). So I still see all abortion as sin but in case of rape where there is abortion only the rapist and not the raped commits the sin of abortion. The rapist has a choice, the raped doesn't have much of one.
This is impossible. A person who fails to understand basic social issues or is morally so twisted could not run the country with such outcome. On other hand slogans like "improve health care or education" are typically populist, politician who raise them these days is a liar and cannot be trusted. Do you have such dilemma? :)
Are you serious that this is impossible........ I can list you a couple American president's who were for abortion yet while they were in term the country has experienced huge economic growth, reduction in debt, better healthcare and education reforms. Come on dude, be serious you know this is not true...
Anyway what is worth more for a Christian innocent life (Decalogue) or money (Judaszowe srebrniki?)? You cannot buy everything.
Good point, unfortunately money makes the world go round.... Look at poor African nations who have no money to feed there people... Poverty, disease and crime is rampant. So yes money can't buy everything but it sure can buy a lot..
