News /
14 year old rape victim from Warsaw denied abortion! [348]
Gunslinger, let's continue this on a point-by-point basis.
1) I agree with you that legislators can be clueless and insensitive but that's a matter for society to regulate and all of us have to accept that sb has to represent us and make laws. That doesn't change the fact that they declared it to be legal. This is for society to change through the relevant democratic channels and discussion through the appropriate forums (fora). "How very human the child is"??? Define very human please (it has the human genome of course). You are wrong, it is how very human the unborn child (foetus) not even will be but
may be (miscarriages, sorry, it was
you who introduced stats
against your own case). Let's say 'will likely be'. In the earliest formative stages, zygote-embryo, you are wrong. However, I also accept that it MUST undergo this formative stage to become as we are so that's where I compromise. The problem for anti-abortionists is in seeing that. I know that if sb killed my bro's young baby or my wife's bro's young baby in front of my eyes (because they are tangible and have taken their first breath is the argument of many), I'd see that as infanticide and would be furious. As long as anti-abortionists can see what I'm saying here, I'll be happy. Still, Gunslinger, please don't make inferential leaps and be careful of your definitions/terminology. Things like this hinge on words.
2) You are confusing the militant wing of Hamas with normal, everyday Palestinians who are not aggressive by nature. Anyway, kids should be well-nourished beings.
3) They don't have malice aforethought, right. Therefore, it doesn't fit the definition of murder as you have claimed that abortion is. Wanna try and meet the definition of infanticide then? This is definitional stuff and concerns the nature of crimes. I'll give you the legal definitions as this is my specialism from uni.
4) First off, I don't assume either way if you have considered that point or not. I don't 'think' that at all as I don't know you. You are just a forum user like I at this time. Gunslinger, please don't turn it on its head. I am well aware of the love and support that many adoptive parents provide. That's in no way in question. However, there is no substitute for real parents, right? You didn't address my questions directly at all. Wow, you could be a legislator ;) ;) ;) God gives us all love, yes!
5) Ridiculous, Gunslinger! Suicidal thoughts are the corollary of being raped for many. Rape is the proximate cause and abortion is then restitution. What is a "completed rape"? Stallard VS HMA (unknown citation, sorry) is the seminal case regulating rape in Scotland. It is the forcible penile penetration of the woman's vagina without her consent, loosely but effectively. Rape is rape, what is an uncompleted rape? You mean that the man ejaculated, right? I'm assuming so, so let me address your point. If that was the choice made, then fine. The fact that it was made by the mother, even better!!! "Murderous social plague"? You have just admitted above that it isn't murder, albeit tacitly. Why on earth are you discussing numbers when I am discussing principle? Also, you are just proving that it isn't a major issue anyway in incidence terms. I don't want to second guess what the industry thinks. Emotion driven as opposed to robot driven? I'm a human, are you? Are the two, reason and emotion, mutually incompatible? According to you, I don't even feel for the woman anyway but am somehow selfish in addressing practicalities.
6) A guy who is about to be murdered KNOWS he is going to be so, feels fear and has a very acute perception of his existence at that moment. Your ignorance led you, in one dismissive stroke, to wipe out the importance of foetal sentience. Sentience is a core issue and there is a fantastic Star Trek episode where Picard defends Data against the deconstruction wishes of Bruce Maddox, a scientist who wishes to examine him for being only a machine. Data can speak and has broad awareness of implications. Does a foetus? Can a foetus talk? I know that it probably will but it still doesn't have sentient status like a zygote and embryo.
7) Easy answer for me. I don't give a toss what she is concerned about, her stats matter. 89% abort within 12 weeks according to those stats. The remaining ones, well, abortion is not black&white so, without further knowledge of the specifics of those cases, I care not to pass judgement.
8) OK, I'm prepared to admit that my stats were way too high (I only surmised after all) but, based on one source, I am not going to believe that yours are any better. How do I know that those views weren't extracted to serve an agenda? Where is my guarantee? It stands to reason that many women would get an abortion after rape if they are self respecting individuals.
9) I think you were ignorant as I was referring to that link which you likely didn't even read. Hmm, "in reference to the link 2 paras above" is not clear enough for you??? I wasn't talking about the pro-life lobby as a whole.
10) I thought, firstly, that you'd recognise what wink marks meant. Secondly, that it was taken from a play you no doubt know, Jesus Christ Superstar, in the 39 lashes scene.
So, what is "the real truth"?
M-G, let me answer your question. The pro-life lobby have neatly circumvented that problem. They have introduced laws which expressly forbid the adoptive parents from revealing the identity of the kid's real parents within a given time frame. They want to normalise the relationship with the kid at the expense of, da da, the truth. Is that the "real truth", Gunslinger? LOL Seek and you shall find ;0 ;)