Wroclaw 44 | 5359 11 Jun 2007 / #1Rule six, in my opinion, fits Michal just fine.Continued negative opinion on one topic {Poland} constitutes spam.Ban him.POSTED BY MODS Rule 6:Intentional posting of the same or very similar message by the same user more than once will be treated as spam and deleted.
ukinpoland 5 | 338 11 Jun 2007 / #2I second that motion. I recently opened up a thread advertising a job in Bydgoszcz. He wrote about what a bad town he thinks it is when the last time he was there was 25 years ago. Not very helpfull information.
daffy 22 | 1153 11 Jun 2007 / #3Your feedback is welcome.michal has posted not only remarks deemed as negative but also positive ones as well. In order to avoid confirmation bias, it will be monitored and reviewed by us.We will look into it.Thanks
FISZ 24 | 2116 11 Jun 2007 / #4It's a tough call with him. I do see helpful posts, but then there are negative to follow. Of course we all have to realize that the last time he was in Poland was in the 80's. I just think he doesn't know. He speaks PL very well, so he must've liked it at one point.He's like a part time troll :)....lol added him to the title. Now his head will expand with his very own topic.
szarlotka 8 | 2205 11 Jun 2007 / #5According to Monty Python there is NO RULE 6. We could, however, get him on rule 1 - not drinking after lights out.
Admin 25 | 403 Administrator 12 Jun 2007 / #6Rule 6 refers to those who copy-paste and post exactly the same message all over again. But if the posts are different, they technically stay within the rules (freedom of speech).But yes, if the only goal of the post/s is to provide untrue or mocking information, it could be considered as breaking the rules.Admin
TheKruk 3 | 308 12 Jun 2007 / #7I don't like his posts and he rubs almost everyone the wrong way and I wish he could be banned. But in all fairness he should be able to stay as this is a forum for sharing all points of view no matter how angry and unthoughtful they are. We all have to admit he keeps things interesting.
miranda 12 Jun 2007 / #8I think that paying too much attention to him makes him appear more important that he really is in the PF scope of things.
hello 22 | 890 12 Jun 2007 / #11I think that paying too much attention to him makes him appear more important that he really is in the PF scope of things.Agree too.